http://reason.com/blog/2012/10/18/yes-ro...t-regulati

Yes, yes, yes.

I saw an interview with a business owner. He had a few hundred employees (not Fortune 500). He really wanted to move the business back to the U.S., but he was paying 5% taxes in China and he would have paid approximately 35% here. His company couldn't compete and survive if they moved to the U.S. He was stuck in China. Communist China is actually more business-friendly than us self-proclaimed free-marketers.

Libs don't ever see the harm their policies cause.

(10-19-2012 08:21 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  Libs don't ever see the harm their policies cause.

I disagree. Libs see the harm, and purposely exploit it to gain more power.

(10-19-2012 08:40 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(10-19-2012 08:21 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  Libs don't ever see the harm their policies cause.

I disagree. Libs see the harm, and purposely exploit it to gain more power.

I'm not sure which it is. But does that really matter? Neither is good.

If we work as a regulator you have to make more regulations every year to make your department seem valuable. It doesn't matter if it is good or kills the economy.

The community organizer never worked a real job as far as I know.

(10-19-2012 08:40 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(10-19-2012 08:21 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  Libs don't ever see the harm their policies cause.

I disagree. Libs see the harm, and purposely exploit it to gain more power.

This is true, at least for Obama. He relishes closing businesses and getting the former employees on government assistance. He had an ear-to-ear grin on his face about that when he shut down the oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico.