The Taliban attempted to kill a 14 year-old girl in Pakistan who advocated educating girls. She was shot in the head and is in critical (but stable) condition.

Multiculturalism says all cultures are of equal value and that to think otherwise is racist. Well, I'll say that Western, Judeo-Christian values are superior to those of the Taliban. I'll go further and say the Taliban consists of animals stuck in the 8th century.

I guess that makes me a racist, a xenophobe, an Islamaphobe, or something else evil (according to the libs).

This is another dispicable act that is the hallmark of Shria. Muhammad is a pervert.

Well, Al-qaida released a statement that they are now going to target journalists and the media because........wait for it............they decided that the media is now biased against them!!

I'm wondering when the shift happened? It couldn't possibly have anything to do with acting like savages, could it? Shooting a little girl because she spoke out against the animals? THAT story of the Pakistani girl is one of the few told in the media of tens of thousands of barbaric acts committed by these 7th century fools each year.

Just like liberals, unable or unwilling to connect cause and effect. Now, it is the MEDIA's fault (for reporting the truth).

As one essayist put it so succinctly;

Quote:The problem with Islam is that Muslims riot and burn and kill those who repeat what already exists in their scriptures.

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3396/i...iU.twitter

Quote:When the life and acts of Mohammed were written and documented by Muslims, it was a source of pride for them; but in the 21st century it has become a source of shame, and now they cannot go back and remove what they already have written about the actions of Mohammed, so all they can do is riot burn and kill anyone who speaks about it. Their prophet has done a lot of unholy acts, but speaking about Islam and Mohammed's actions in an analytical way has become a crime. United Nations Resolution 1618, "The Istanbul Process," sponsored last December in a three-day, closed-door meeting in Washington D.C. by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, attempts to make it an international crime to discuss "religion" -- code for Islam. This proposal to criminalize free speech was repeated in September at the UN by the Ambassador from Pakistan, its sponsor; and repeated again by Egypt's new President, Mohamed Morsi.

The scary part now is that the U.S. president seems to agree.

(10-15-2012 02:24 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Well, Al-qaida released a statement that they are now going to target journalists and the media because........wait for it............they decided that the media is now biased against them!!

I'm wondering when the shift happened? It couldn't possibly have anything to do with acting like savages, could it? Shooting a little girl because she spoke out against the animals? THAT story of the Pakistani girl is one of the few told in the media of tens of thousands of barbaric acts committed by these 7th century fools each year.

Just like liberals, unable or unwilling to connect cause and effect. Now, it is the MEDIA's fault (for reporting the truth).

As one essayist put it so succinctly;

Quote:The problem with Islam is that Muslims riot and burn and kill those who repeat what already exists in their scriptures.

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3396/i...iU.twitter

Quote:When the life and acts of Mohammed were written and documented by Muslims, it was a source of pride for them; but in the 21st century it has become a source of shame, and now they cannot go back and remove what they already have written about the actions of Mohammed, so all they can do is riot burn and kill anyone who speaks about it. Their prophet has done a lot of unholy acts, but speaking about Islam and Mohammed's actions in an analytical way has become a crime. United Nations Resolution 1618, "The Istanbul Process," sponsored last December in a three-day, closed-door meeting in Washington D.C. by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, attempts to make it an international crime to discuss "religion" -- code for Islam. This proposal to criminalize free speech was repeated in September at the UN by the Ambassador from Pakistan, its sponsor; and repeated again by Egypt's new President, Mohamed Morsi.

The scary part now is that the U.S. president seems to agree.

And how is that different from the Republicans say about the media?

(10-15-2012 02:47 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(10-15-2012 02:24 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Well, Al-qaida released a statement that they are now going to target journalists and the media because........wait for it............they decided that the media is now biased against them!!

I'm wondering when the shift happened? It couldn't possibly have anything to do with acting like savages, could it? Shooting a little girl because she spoke out against the animals? THAT story of the Pakistani girl is one of the few told in the media of tens of thousands of barbaric acts committed by these 7th century fools each year.

Just like liberals, unable or unwilling to connect cause and effect. Now, it is the MEDIA's fault (for reporting the truth).

As one essayist put it so succinctly;

Quote:The problem with Islam is that Muslims riot and burn and kill those who repeat what already exists in their scriptures.

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3396/i...iU.twitter

Quote:When the life and acts of Mohammed were written and documented by Muslims, it was a source of pride for them; but in the 21st century it has become a source of shame, and now they cannot go back and remove what they already have written about the actions of Mohammed, so all they can do is riot burn and kill anyone who speaks about it. Their prophet has done a lot of unholy acts, but speaking about Islam and Mohammed's actions in an analytical way has become a crime. United Nations Resolution 1618, "The Istanbul Process," sponsored last December in a three-day, closed-door meeting in Washington D.C. by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, attempts to make it an international crime to discuss "religion" -- code for Islam. This proposal to criminalize free speech was repeated in September at the UN by the Ambassador from Pakistan, its sponsor; and repeated again by Egypt's new President, Mohamed Morsi.

The scary part now is that the U.S. president seems to agree.

And how is that different from the Republicans say about the media?

Are you related to Robert?

(10-15-2012 02:51 PM)GrayBeard Wrote:  

(10-15-2012 02:47 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(10-15-2012 02:24 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Well, Al-qaida released a statement that they are now going to target journalists and the media because........wait for it............they decided that the media is now biased against them!!

I'm wondering when the shift happened? It couldn't possibly have anything to do with acting like savages, could it? Shooting a little girl because she spoke out against the animals? THAT story of the Pakistani girl is one of the few told in the media of tens of thousands of barbaric acts committed by these 7th century fools each year.

Just like liberals, unable or unwilling to connect cause and effect. Now, it is the MEDIA's fault (for reporting the truth).

As one essayist put it so succinctly;

Quote:The problem with Islam is that Muslims riot and burn and kill those who repeat what already exists in their scriptures.

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3396/i...iU.twitter

Quote:When the life and acts of Mohammed were written and documented by Muslims, it was a source of pride for them; but in the 21st century it has become a source of shame, and now they cannot go back and remove what they already have written about the actions of Mohammed, so all they can do is riot burn and kill anyone who speaks about it. Their prophet has done a lot of unholy acts, but speaking about Islam and Mohammed's actions in an analytical way has become a crime. United Nations Resolution 1618, "The Istanbul Process," sponsored last December in a three-day, closed-door meeting in Washington D.C. by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, attempts to make it an international crime to discuss "religion" -- code for Islam. This proposal to criminalize free speech was repeated in September at the UN by the Ambassador from Pakistan, its sponsor; and repeated again by Egypt's new President, Mohamed Morsi.

The scary part now is that the U.S. president seems to agree.

And how is that different from the Republicans say about the media?

Are you related to Robert?

Yes I am related since we all descend from Adam and Eve.

I guess by your comment there is no difference in what The Taliban and The GOP do by blaming the media.

Last time I checked, Republicans don't attack, riot, maim and murder people they disagree with or think are biased against them. These guys (al-qaida and other Islamists) are TELLING us that they are going to target media. When they say they are going to target you, perhaps it is a good idea to pay attention. Target means "kill" to them. THAT is how it is different from what Republicans SAY, as if you really didn't know.

If a story is not reported in our press, did it really happen? Our media is very biased - as much in HOW they report the news as to WHAT they choose to IGNORE and not report. You have to almost read the foreign press to really know what is going on around the world, our press leaves out so much of what is happening. Our MSM is also restrained by political correctness and does not report on most of the many atrocities committed by that 'religion of peace.'

I'm surprised by your post because my impression was that you were a pretty level headed poster. Guess I was wrong.

(10-15-2012 02:47 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(10-15-2012 02:24 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Well, Al-qaida released a statement that they are now going to target journalists and the media because........wait for it............they decided that the media is now biased against them!!

I'm wondering when the shift happened? It couldn't possibly have anything to do with acting like savages, could it? Shooting a little girl because she spoke out against the animals? THAT story of the Pakistani girl is one of the few told in the media of tens of thousands of barbaric acts committed by these 7th century fools each year.

Just like liberals, unable or unwilling to connect cause and effect. Now, it is the MEDIA's fault (for reporting the truth).

As one essayist put it so succinctly;

Quote:The problem with Islam is that Muslims riot and burn and kill those who repeat what already exists in their scriptures.

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3396/i...iU.twitter

Quote:When the life and acts of Mohammed were written and documented by Muslims, it was a source of pride for them; but in the 21st century it has become a source of shame, and now they cannot go back and remove what they already have written about the actions of Mohammed, so all they can do is riot burn and kill anyone who speaks about it. Their prophet has done a lot of unholy acts, but speaking about Islam and Mohammed's actions in an analytical way has become a crime. United Nations Resolution 1618, "The Istanbul Process," sponsored last December in a three-day, closed-door meeting in Washington D.C. by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, attempts to make it an international crime to discuss "religion" -- code for Islam. This proposal to criminalize free speech was repeated in September at the UN by the Ambassador from Pakistan, its sponsor; and repeated again by Egypt's new President, Mohamed Morsi.

The scary part now is that the U.S. president seems to agree.

And how is that different from the Republicans say about the media?

Well, nobody's shot the cast of the View in the head.

(10-15-2012 04:00 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(10-15-2012 02:47 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(10-15-2012 02:24 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Well, Al-qaida released a statement that they are now going to target journalists and the media because........wait for it............they decided that the media is now biased against them!!

I'm wondering when the shift happened? It couldn't possibly have anything to do with acting like savages, could it? Shooting a little girl because she spoke out against the animals? THAT story of the Pakistani girl is one of the few told in the media of tens of thousands of barbaric acts committed by these 7th century fools each year.

Just like liberals, unable or unwilling to connect cause and effect. Now, it is the MEDIA's fault (for reporting the truth).

As one essayist put it so succinctly;

Quote:The problem with Islam is that Muslims riot and burn and kill those who repeat what already exists in their scriptures.

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3396/i...iU.twitter

Quote:When the life and acts of Mohammed were written and documented by Muslims, it was a source of pride for them; but in the 21st century it has become a source of shame, and now they cannot go back and remove what they already have written about the actions of Mohammed, so all they can do is riot burn and kill anyone who speaks about it. Their prophet has done a lot of unholy acts, but speaking about Islam and Mohammed's actions in an analytical way has become a crime. United Nations Resolution 1618, "The Istanbul Process," sponsored last December in a three-day, closed-door meeting in Washington D.C. by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, attempts to make it an international crime to discuss "religion" -- code for Islam. This proposal to criminalize free speech was repeated in September at the UN by the Ambassador from Pakistan, its sponsor; and repeated again by Egypt's new President, Mohamed Morsi.

The scary part now is that the U.S. president seems to agree.

And how is that different from the Republicans say about the media?

Well, nobody's shot the cast of the View in the head.

So are you saying that although the Taliban and the GOP share common values on their attack on the media, it is ok because the tactics they use may be different?

(10-15-2012 04:09 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(10-15-2012 04:00 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(10-15-2012 02:47 PM)dcCid Wrote:  

(10-15-2012 02:24 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Well, Al-qaida released a statement that they are now going to target journalists and the media because........wait for it............they decided that the media is now biased against them!!

I'm wondering when the shift happened? It couldn't possibly have anything to do with acting like savages, could it? Shooting a little girl because she spoke out against the animals? THAT story of the Pakistani girl is one of the few told in the media of tens of thousands of barbaric acts committed by these 7th century fools each year.

Just like liberals, unable or unwilling to connect cause and effect. Now, it is the MEDIA's fault (for reporting the truth).

As one essayist put it so succinctly;

Quote:The problem with Islam is that Muslims riot and burn and kill those who repeat what already exists in their scriptures.

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3396/i...iU.twitter

Quote:When the life and acts of Mohammed were written and documented by Muslims, it was a source of pride for them; but in the 21st century it has become a source of shame, and now they cannot go back and remove what they already have written about the actions of Mohammed, so all they can do is riot burn and kill anyone who speaks about it. Their prophet has done a lot of unholy acts, but speaking about Islam and Mohammed's actions in an analytical way has become a crime. United Nations Resolution 1618, "The Istanbul Process," sponsored last December in a three-day, closed-door meeting in Washington D.C. by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, attempts to make it an international crime to discuss "religion" -- code for Islam. This proposal to criminalize free speech was repeated in September at the UN by the Ambassador from Pakistan, its sponsor; and repeated again by Egypt's new President, Mohamed Morsi.

The scary part now is that the U.S. president seems to agree.

And how is that different from the Republicans say about the media?

Well, nobody's shot the cast of the View in the head.

So are you saying that although the Taliban and the GOP share common values on their attack on the media, it is ok because the tactics they use may be different?

Heh, no.

I'm going to issue a fatwa against MSNBC.

(10-15-2012 04:09 PM)dcCid Wrote:  So are you saying that although the Taliban and the GOP share common values on their attack on the media, it is ok because the tactics they use may be different?

Are you really that obtuse?

One group wants to silence the press by killing them. Kind of like the extreme left wanting to muzzle dissent in this country (fairness doctrine), just a bit more extreme.

The other group simply wants a press that is not biased to one ideological side. No threats issued.

Yeah, I can see why you would be confused.