Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Disenfranchising The Military Vote, Again
Author Message
SumOfAllFears Offline
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
*

Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
Post: #1
Disenfranchising The Military Vote, Again
Michigan, Mississippi, Vermont denies the military overseas the right to vote in this presidential election. States Fail to meet deadline to send out ballots.

From yorknewstimes.com

Quote:Less than 16% of the troops cited "national security" issues as their reason for voting for Romney, but that may change as Obama's bumbling of the situations in Libya, Iran, and Syria unfold; and as Al Qaeda has reemerged in Iraq and Afghanistan along with a resurgent Taliban.

So, when the majority of our military members openly state they won't vote for Obama, why would the Administration comply with a voting law for the troops that will likely work against the Obama re-election bid?

Obviously they're not.
(This post was last modified: 10-13-2012 09:28 AM by SumOfAllFears.)
10-13-2012 08:40 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


RaiderATO Offline
Puddin' Stick
*

Posts: 6,093
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 139
I Root For: MiddleTennessee
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Post: #2
RE: Disenfranchising The Military Vote, Again
(10-13-2012 08:40 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Michigan, Mississippi, Vermont denies the military overseas the right to vote in this presidential election. States Fail to meet deadline to send out ballots.

From the NYT no Less

Quote:Less than 16% of the troops cited "national security" issues as their reason for voting for Romney, but that may change as Obama's bumbling of the situations in Libya, Iran, and Syria unfold; and as Al Qaeda has reemerged in Iraq and Afghanistan along with a resurgent Taliban.

So, when the majority of our military members openly state they won't vote for Obama, why would the Administration comply with a voting law for the troops that will likely work against the Obama re-election bid?

Obviously they're not.

The York, NE newspaper isn't exactly the NYT.

Also, the article says nothing about the states you mentioned. Your lead-in implicates the states, when the article implicates the Pentagon and Feds.
10-13-2012 09:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RobertN Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 35,485
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 95
I Root For: THE NIU Huskies
Location: Wayne's World
Post: #3
RE: Disenfranchising The Military Vote, Again
(10-13-2012 09:13 AM)RaiderATO Wrote:  
(10-13-2012 08:40 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Michigan, Mississippi, Vermont denies the military overseas the right to vote in this presidential election. States Fail to meet deadline to send out ballots.

From the NYT no Less

Quote:Less than 16% of the troops cited "national security" issues as their reason for voting for Romney, but that may change as Obama's bumbling of the situations in Libya, Iran, and Syria unfold; and as Al Qaeda has reemerged in Iraq and Afghanistan along with a resurgent Taliban.

So, when the majority of our military members openly state they won't vote for Obama, why would the Administration comply with a voting law for the troops that will likely work against the Obama re-election bid?

Obviously they're not.

The York, NE newspaper isn't exactly the NYT.

Also, the article says nothing about the states you mentioned. Your lead-in implicates the states, when the article implicates the Pentagon and Feds.
Pretty much what should be expected from SOAF. I think this pretty much proves that SOAF is a fraud. Someone sends him crap to repost for cash.
10-13-2012 09:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


SumOfAllFears Offline
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
*

Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Disenfranchising The Military Vote, Again
(10-13-2012 09:13 AM)RaiderATO Wrote:  
(10-13-2012 08:40 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Michigan, Mississippi, Vermont denies the military overseas the right to vote in this presidential election. States Fail to meet deadline to send out ballots.

From the NYT no Less

Quote:Less than 16% of the troops cited "national security" issues as their reason for voting for Romney, but that may change as Obama's bumbling of the situations in Libya, Iran, and Syria unfold; and as Al Qaeda has reemerged in Iraq and Afghanistan along with a resurgent Taliban.

So, when the majority of our military members openly state they won't vote for Obama, why would the Administration comply with a voting law for the troops that will likely work against the Obama re-election bid?

Obviously they're not.

The York, NE newspaper isn't exactly the NYT.

Also, the article says nothing about the states you mentioned. Your lead-in implicates the states, when the article implicates the Pentagon and Feds.

Those states are being sued. So I got the name wrong, so what? Does that mean it is not happening.

Romney seeks extended deadline for overseas voters
(This post was last modified: 10-13-2012 09:35 AM by SumOfAllFears.)
10-13-2012 09:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RobertN Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 35,485
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 95
I Root For: THE NIU Huskies
Location: Wayne's World
Post: #5
RE: Disenfranchising The Military Vote, Again
(10-13-2012 09:26 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  
(10-13-2012 09:13 AM)RaiderATO Wrote:  
(10-13-2012 08:40 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Michigan, Mississippi, Vermont denies the military overseas the right to vote in this presidential election. States Fail to meet deadline to send out ballots.

From the NYT no Less

Quote:Less than 16% of the troops cited "national security" issues as their reason for voting for Romney, but that may change as Obama's bumbling of the situations in Libya, Iran, and Syria unfold; and as Al Qaeda has reemerged in Iraq and Afghanistan along with a resurgent Taliban.

So, when the majority of our military members openly state they won't vote for Obama, why would the Administration comply with a voting law for the troops that will likely work against the Obama re-election bid?

Obviously they're not.

The York, NE newspaper isn't exactly the NYT.

Also, the article says nothing about the states you mentioned. Your lead-in implicates the states, when the article implicates the Pentagon and Feds.

Those states are being sued. So I got the name wrong, so what? Does that mean it is not happening.

Romney seeks extended deadline for overseas voters
So you have now gone from "NYT"( 03-lmfao as if a small Nebraska paper can be confused with the NYT. Admit it SOAF you are a ******* moron) to a Faux Boobs article. Nicely done!
10-13-2012 09:40 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.