SumOfAllFears
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
|
Disenfranchising The Military Vote, Again
Michigan, Mississippi, Vermont denies the military overseas the right to vote in this presidential election. States Fail to meet deadline to send out ballots.
From yorknewstimes.com
Quote:Less than 16% of the troops cited "national security" issues as their reason for voting for Romney, but that may change as Obama's bumbling of the situations in Libya, Iran, and Syria unfold; and as Al Qaeda has reemerged in Iraq and Afghanistan along with a resurgent Taliban.
So, when the majority of our military members openly state they won't vote for Obama, why would the Administration comply with a voting law for the troops that will likely work against the Obama re-election bid?
Obviously they're not.
(This post was last modified: 10-13-2012 09:28 AM by SumOfAllFears.)
|
|
10-13-2012 08:40 AM |
|
RaiderATO
Puddin' Stick
Posts: 6,093
Joined: May 2005
Reputation: 139
I Root For: MiddleTennessee
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
|
RE: Disenfranchising The Military Vote, Again
(10-13-2012 08:40 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote: Michigan, Mississippi, Vermont denies the military overseas the right to vote in this presidential election. States Fail to meet deadline to send out ballots.
From the NYT no Less
Quote:Less than 16% of the troops cited "national security" issues as their reason for voting for Romney, but that may change as Obama's bumbling of the situations in Libya, Iran, and Syria unfold; and as Al Qaeda has reemerged in Iraq and Afghanistan along with a resurgent Taliban.
So, when the majority of our military members openly state they won't vote for Obama, why would the Administration comply with a voting law for the troops that will likely work against the Obama re-election bid?
Obviously they're not.
The York, NE newspaper isn't exactly the NYT.
Also, the article says nothing about the states you mentioned. Your lead-in implicates the states, when the article implicates the Pentagon and Feds.
|
|
10-13-2012 09:13 AM |
|
RobertN
Legend
Posts: 35,485
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 95
I Root For: THE NIU Huskies
Location: Wayne's World
|
RE: Disenfranchising The Military Vote, Again
(10-13-2012 09:13 AM)RaiderATO Wrote: (10-13-2012 08:40 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote: Michigan, Mississippi, Vermont denies the military overseas the right to vote in this presidential election. States Fail to meet deadline to send out ballots.
From the NYT no Less
Quote:Less than 16% of the troops cited "national security" issues as their reason for voting for Romney, but that may change as Obama's bumbling of the situations in Libya, Iran, and Syria unfold; and as Al Qaeda has reemerged in Iraq and Afghanistan along with a resurgent Taliban.
So, when the majority of our military members openly state they won't vote for Obama, why would the Administration comply with a voting law for the troops that will likely work against the Obama re-election bid?
Obviously they're not.
The York, NE newspaper isn't exactly the NYT.
Also, the article says nothing about the states you mentioned. Your lead-in implicates the states, when the article implicates the Pentagon and Feds.
Pretty much what should be expected from SOAF. I think this pretty much proves that SOAF is a fraud. Someone sends him crap to repost for cash.
|
|
10-13-2012 09:26 AM |
|
SumOfAllFears
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
|
RE: Disenfranchising The Military Vote, Again
(10-13-2012 09:13 AM)RaiderATO Wrote: (10-13-2012 08:40 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote: Michigan, Mississippi, Vermont denies the military overseas the right to vote in this presidential election. States Fail to meet deadline to send out ballots.
From the NYT no Less
Quote:Less than 16% of the troops cited "national security" issues as their reason for voting for Romney, but that may change as Obama's bumbling of the situations in Libya, Iran, and Syria unfold; and as Al Qaeda has reemerged in Iraq and Afghanistan along with a resurgent Taliban.
So, when the majority of our military members openly state they won't vote for Obama, why would the Administration comply with a voting law for the troops that will likely work against the Obama re-election bid?
Obviously they're not.
The York, NE newspaper isn't exactly the NYT.
Also, the article says nothing about the states you mentioned. Your lead-in implicates the states, when the article implicates the Pentagon and Feds.
Those states are being sued. So I got the name wrong, so what? Does that mean it is not happening.
Romney seeks extended deadline for overseas voters
(This post was last modified: 10-13-2012 09:35 AM by SumOfAllFears.)
|
|
10-13-2012 09:26 AM |
|
RobertN
Legend
Posts: 35,485
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 95
I Root For: THE NIU Huskies
Location: Wayne's World
|
RE: Disenfranchising The Military Vote, Again
(10-13-2012 09:26 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote: (10-13-2012 09:13 AM)RaiderATO Wrote: (10-13-2012 08:40 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote: Michigan, Mississippi, Vermont denies the military overseas the right to vote in this presidential election. States Fail to meet deadline to send out ballots.
From the NYT no Less
Quote:Less than 16% of the troops cited "national security" issues as their reason for voting for Romney, but that may change as Obama's bumbling of the situations in Libya, Iran, and Syria unfold; and as Al Qaeda has reemerged in Iraq and Afghanistan along with a resurgent Taliban.
So, when the majority of our military members openly state they won't vote for Obama, why would the Administration comply with a voting law for the troops that will likely work against the Obama re-election bid?
Obviously they're not.
The York, NE newspaper isn't exactly the NYT.
Also, the article says nothing about the states you mentioned. Your lead-in implicates the states, when the article implicates the Pentagon and Feds.
Those states are being sued. So I got the name wrong, so what? Does that mean it is not happening.
Romney seeks extended deadline for overseas voters
So you have now gone from "NYT"( as if a small Nebraska paper can be confused with the NYT. Admit it SOAF you are a ******* moron) to a Faux Boobs article. Nicely done!
|
|
10-13-2012 09:40 AM |
|