Ring of Black
Official Person to Blame
Posts: 28,421
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 722
I Root For: Cincy Bearcats
Location: Wichita, KS
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
Congrats on the win UConn. You did what you had to.
Molnar is high energy. He'll get it going at UMass.
|
|
08-30-2012 09:34 PM |
|
UConn-SMU
often wrong, never in doubt
Posts: 12,961
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 373
I Root For: the AAC
Location: Fuzzy's Taco Shop
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
NBE off to a good start. It would be sweet if we went undefeated this weekend. ESPN might even mention it.
|
|
08-30-2012 09:40 PM |
|
fusion1906
Water Engineer
Posts: 78
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 17
I Root For: Big East
Location: Clifton, NJ
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
My game observations"
1. ESPN3 is awful. Commercials came through clear but game was grainy. Wasn't able to see halftime activities. Not a good viewing experience
2. UCONN's defense looked good. THey were fast to the ball and brought great pressure.
3. The offensive line has some work to do. Not alot of running room foy the backs.
4.The special teams will win some games this year. Nick Williams looked dynamic returning kicks and the kicking game was solid.
5. They will have better play makers on the outside. Shakim Philips, Jeremy Davis and mike smith made some plays.
Chandler Whitmer will definately be an upgrade. He threw the ball with confidence and was pretty accurate with his throws. He made a couple of bad throws but overall, pretty good first FBS game.
6. The wildcar will negate some of the gains made at QB. It just seem like they were shuffling QB's in and out. Chandler whitmer never had a chance to establish a rhythm. It seemed like every time he made a great throw for a first down, they would take him out and put mccummings in. Then he came back in to a 2nd and 8 to 2nd and 10. They didn't gain enough yardage in the wildcat to justify using it that much and I think it hurt the offensive flow. Remember, in a blow out win, the offense only scored 2 TD. I thought the wildcat especially hurt them on that fumble at the goal line.
I think UCONN can have a good season but they will need a QB to establish himself. That means picking a QB and sticking with it. Let him establish chemistry with his receivers and get in the flow of the game
(This post was last modified: 08-30-2012 10:34 PM by fusion1906.)
|
|
08-30-2012 10:32 PM |
|
KingFu
Banned
Posts: 95
Joined: Aug 2012
I Root For: U of Memphis
Location:
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
(08-30-2012 09:13 PM)uconnbaseball Wrote: 34-0 UConn. I am happy with the receivers and defense, but the QB position is still a work in progress and the OL is awful.
Great win! We need ALL 12 members (new and current, minus Syracuse and Pitt) to do well to up the value of the conference.
|
|
08-30-2012 10:41 PM |
|
JHG722
Hall of Famer
Posts: 14,917
Joined: May 2009
Reputation: 219
I Root For: Temple
Location: Philadelphia, PA
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
We may struggle this year and we may even lose to UConn, but there is no way they are better than us.
|
|
08-30-2012 10:58 PM |
|
Wilkie01
Cards Prognosticater
Posts: 26,753
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 1072
I Root For: Louisville
Location: Planet Red
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
Nice win Huskies
|
|
08-30-2012 11:38 PM |
|
SF Husky
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,338
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 295
I Root For: UCONN
Location:
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
(08-30-2012 10:58 PM)JHG722 Wrote: We may struggle this year and we may even lose to UConn, but there is no way they are better than us.
You need some help.
|
|
08-31-2012 01:43 AM |
|
SF Husky
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,338
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 295
I Root For: UCONN
Location:
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
(08-30-2012 10:32 PM)fusion1906 Wrote: My game observations"
1. ESPN3 is awful. Commercials came through clear but game was grainy. Wasn't able to see halftime activities. Not a good viewing experience
2. UCONN's defense looked good. THey were fast to the ball and brought great pressure.
3. The offensive line has some work to do. Not alot of running room foy the backs.
4.The special teams will win some games this year. Nick Williams looked dynamic returning kicks and the kicking game was solid.
5. They will have better play makers on the outside. Shakim Philips, Jeremy Davis and mike smith made some plays.
Chandler Whitmer will definately be an upgrade. He threw the ball with confidence and was pretty accurate with his throws. He made a couple of bad throws but overall, pretty good first FBS game.
6. The wildcar will negate some of the gains made at QB. It just seem like they were shuffling QB's in and out. Chandler whitmer never had a chance to establish a rhythm. It seemed like every time he made a great throw for a first down, they would take him out and put mccummings in. Then he came back in to a 2nd and 8 to 2nd and 10. They didn't gain enough yardage in the wildcat to justify using it that much and I think it hurt the offensive flow. Remember, in a blow out win, the offense only scored 2 TD. I thought the wildcat especially hurt them on that fumble at the goal line.
I think UCONN can have a good season but they will need a QB to establish himself. That means picking a QB and sticking with it. Let him establish chemistry with his receivers and get in the flow of the game
Good observations. I don't think UCONN showed much on offense today. We ran the wildcat formation way too much. They probably kept some plays for next week against NCST. UCONN defense was dominating. I believe UMASS only had 80 yards for the entire game. UMASS defense was pretty good.
(This post was last modified: 08-31-2012 01:46 AM by SF Husky.)
|
|
08-31-2012 01:45 AM |
|
Tigeer
Heisman
Posts: 7,526
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation: 127
I Root For: UoM & WVU
Location: Martinsville, VA
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
(08-30-2012 09:01 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote: UConn is #1 in New England college sports. Now UMass is playing FBS football (sort of) at Gillette Stadium. All of this pushes BC into further irrelevance.
The ACC made a mistake on the BC thing; they would have been served picking Rutgers or UConn originally if it was eyeballs and academics they were after. If it was quality FB on the field - WVU would have been the choice.
|
|
08-31-2012 12:28 PM |
|
Lolly Popp
Magically Delicious
Posts: 2,425
Joined: Oct 2005
Reputation: 82
I Root For: Football
Location: Endzone
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
(08-30-2012 07:59 PM)General Mike Wrote: UMass looks terrible. Like worst team in FBS terrible.
This was the Minutemen's first game as a full FBS program. UMass is obviously a work in progress and will struggle for a few seasons. Molnar is a good coach and will eventually have his team looking pretty solid. I just wish UMass had moved up a decade ago and gotten this phase over with already.
|
|
08-31-2012 01:05 PM |
|
SF Husky
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,338
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 295
I Root For: UCONN
Location:
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
I will summarize based on what I saw.
The Good:
Defense - This is a much improved defense after one year in Don Brown's system. UCONN got athletic studs all over the field. UCONN LBs are solid and will be one of the best in the nation. Last year secondary was decimated by injury. This year there is depth and some experience. I love the aggression this defense has throughout the game. This unit held UMASS to 3 yards total rushing for the game on 24 attempts. They held UMASS to 59 total yards in the entire. I don't care if this is UMASS, that's pretty good. Next week this unit will face NCST and we will find out if this unit is for real. For the record, I predicted UCONN would have one of the best defenses in the BE and I hope they can live up to that billing.
Special Team - Nick Williams is a stud and will make some huge plays this year. He had some nice returns. Our punter punted a couple of times and was very good. Biggest surprise was our FG kicker who kicked 3 FGs with longest FG being 47 yards. He has a huge shoe to fill for Teggart who graduated but that's a great start for Christian. He was awesome throughout the game. We haven't seen him in pressure situation yet so the jury is still out, but that was a great start. Special team also blocked a punt resulted in a TD. That was awesome to watch. It was like bunch of wild dogs going after a piece of steak. They were fast and ferocious going after the blocked punt.
Unknown:
Offense - Not sure what to make of this unit yet. Chandler is light years ahead of last year's QB Johnny MAC. His presence, footwork and throwing motion are way better than last few UCONN QBs. This kid has the potential to be a very good QB down the road. It was his first game so I expected some nerves. He made one bad throw resulted in an INT. The other INT was a fluke so it is not entirely his fault. He delivered the ball on time and accurate for the most part. Biggest surprise was emergence of Davis our sophomore WR. He pulled in 5 catches and looked very fast and athletic. Michael Smith also looked very good this game. Phillips did not make an impact but he looked good running his routes. I expect this unit will surprise many people mainly due to huge upgrade at the QB level.
Running game was subpar. UCONN ran way too many wildcat formations. I am not sure this is due to the fact coaches were holding it back due to NCST next week, but we saw way too much Mccummings as the wildcat QB. We also never threw one pass out of this formation. Our running game had some great moments but was subpar comparing to the usual UCONN standard. Our OL did not open huge holes for our RBs either. This could be due to UMASS shelling out to stop the run. They stacked the line regularly but UCONN ran at it regardless. There were some big plays available but UCONN did not try to take advantage of them using the pass.
Jury is still out on the offense. We will find out next week against NCST. Overall, it was a good first game. The team looked in sync without any stupid penalties. Next week will be the show me week against NCST who is one of the favorites to win the ACC this year.
|
|
08-31-2012 01:22 PM |
|
Gray Avenger
Hall of Famer
Posts: 19,451
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 744
I Root For: MEMPHIS
Location: Memphis
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
Congratulations Huskies! Someone told me that Mike Aresco's high school coach is on UConn's Board of Directors. Hope that's true - maybe it will help keep UConn in the Big East.
|
|
08-31-2012 04:01 PM |
|
Steve1981
Heisman
Posts: 5,432
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 267
I Root For: UMass
Location: North Quabbin Region
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
|
|
08-31-2012 05:49 PM |
|
SF Husky
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,338
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 295
I Root For: UCONN
Location:
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
|
|
08-31-2012 06:01 PM |
|
UConn-SMU
often wrong, never in doubt
Posts: 12,961
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 373
I Root For: the AAC
Location: Fuzzy's Taco Shop
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
(08-31-2012 01:22 PM)SF Husky Wrote: I will summarize based on what I saw.
The Good:
Defense - This is a much improved defense after one year in Don Brown's system. UCONN got athletic studs all over the field. UCONN LBs are solid and will be one of the best in the nation. Last year secondary was decimated by injury. This year there is depth and some experience. I love the aggression this defense has throughout the game. This unit held UMASS to 3 yards total rushing for the game on 24 attempts. They held UMASS to 59 total yards in the entire. I don't care if this is UMASS, that's pretty good. Next week this unit will face NCST and we will find out if this unit is for real. For the record, I predicted UCONN would have one of the best defenses in the BE and I hope they can live up to that billing.
Special Team - Nick Williams is a stud and will make some huge plays this year. He had some nice returns. Our punter punted a couple of times and was very good. Biggest surprise was our FG kicker who kicked 3 FGs with longest FG being 47 yards. He has a huge shoe to fill for Teggart who graduated but that's a great start for Christian. He was awesome throughout the game. We haven't seen him in pressure situation yet so the jury is still out, but that was a great start. Special team also blocked a punt resulted in a TD. That was awesome to watch. It was like bunch of wild dogs going after a piece of steak. They were fast and ferocious going after the blocked punt.
Unknown:
Offense - Not sure what to make of this unit yet. Chandler is light years ahead of last year's QB Johnny MAC. His presence, footwork and throwing motion are way better than last few UCONN QBs. This kid has the potential to be a very good QB down the road. It was his first game so I expected some nerves. He made one bad throw resulted in an INT. The other INT was a fluke so it is not entirely his fault. He delivered the ball on time and accurate for the most part. Biggest surprise was emergence of Davis our sophomore WR. He pulled in 5 catches and looked very fast and athletic. Michael Smith also looked very good this game. Phillips did not make an impact but he looked good running his routes. I expect this unit will surprise many people mainly due to huge upgrade at the QB level.
Running game was subpar. UCONN ran way too many wildcat formations. I am not sure this is due to the fact coaches were holding it back due to NCST next week, but we saw way too much Mccummings as the wildcat QB. We also never threw one pass out of this formation. Our running game had some great moments but was subpar comparing to the usual UCONN standard. Our OL did not open huge holes for our RBs either. This could be due to UMASS shelling out to stop the run. They stacked the line regularly but UCONN ran at it regardless. There were some big plays available but UCONN did not try to take advantage of them using the pass.
Jury is still out on the offense. We will find out next week against NCST. Overall, it was a good first game. The team looked in sync without any stupid penalties. Next week will be the show me week against NCST who is one of the favorites to win the ACC this year.
I agree with all of the above. Too much unproductive wildcat and not enough holes opened up by the O-line. And do we really need to throw the ball 40 yards into double coverage in a 3rd and 5 situation?
Otherwise, we looked really good.
|
|
08-31-2012 07:16 PM |
|
Sultan of Euphonistan
All American
Posts: 4,999
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 80
I Root For: Baritones
Location: The Euphonistan Tree
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
(08-30-2012 09:33 PM)BJUnklFkr Wrote: (08-30-2012 09:29 PM)TempleU22 Wrote: Not saying you're wrong, because...well it's kind of a "no **** sherlock" kind of statement.
You are looking at probably the two worst MAC teams though.
I'm CONCERNED about our trip to Toledo. I'm confident we'll win, but not arrogant enough to predict a romp.
There are some good teams in that league, and you're right. Akron and UMass aren't them.
Yea this. You are not going to get much from these games as Akron, Umass, and Nova are not good this year (Akron and likely UMass will be epic bad though I hope UMass beats Akron if they play this year). You should save the "my team looks awesome" until you at least play a team with a pulse.
|
|
09-01-2012 01:56 AM |
|
panite
Heisman
Posts: 6,216
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation: 221
I Root For: Owls-SC-RU-Navy
Location:
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
|
|
09-01-2012 09:17 AM |
|
UConn-SMU
often wrong, never in doubt
Posts: 12,961
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 373
I Root For: the AAC
Location: Fuzzy's Taco Shop
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
|
|
09-01-2012 01:50 PM |
|
SF Husky
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11,338
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 295
I Root For: UCONN
Location:
|
RE: UConn vs UMass Game Thread
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2012 03:32 PM by SF Husky.)
|
|
09-01-2012 03:32 PM |
|