(08-22-2012 08:42 AM)Rebel Wrote:  

(08-22-2012 08:38 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Third, these three were from Florida and New Hampshire, not Chicago. Occupy ain't the tea party. They don't round up folks and bus them a thousand miles.

Really?

Occupy Oakland Mass Arrest of 409 Leads to Only 12 Charges

Eleven demonstrators were slapped with stay away orders, which means they face legal action if found within 300 feet of Oakland City Hall or the shuttered Henry J. Kaiser Convention Center, which was the focal point of Saturday's protest. Four felony charges were leveled -- including charges for assaulting a police officer -- and eight misdemeanors, the Bay Citizen reported. None of the alleged felons are Oakland residents, according to reports.


The Tea Party isn't "rounding" anyone up. ALL of those participants are willing supporters of small government.

Occupy Houston allied itself with SEIU, Good Jobs= Great Houston (an AFL-CIO front) to pump up a bunch of Part-Time Janitors that staged a strike. The "strike" included street demonstrations during Rush Hour traffic where the SEIU "Janitors" were arrested for Blocking Roads, Resisting Arrest, and in one instance, Assault on a Police Officer.

Turns out these "Janitors" that were arrested... weren't really Houston Janitors at all, but SEIU Thugs brought in from Chicago.

https://www.facebook.com/events/474207195929833/

http://www.chron.com/default/article/7-a...751654.php

(08-22-2012 08:38 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-21-2012 04:05 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  

(08-21-2012 02:30 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Like I have said before, true occupy folks in no way endorse that behavior or participate in it. It turned into a big movement with a big fringe of folks who were really pissed. But it was born out of passion and a real cause. The Tea Party, while it had good original intentions, was taken over by the Republican Party and was a fake movement with no real cause and no real passion.

There is ZERO evidence of any organized OWS movement to blow up a bridge, riot, vandalize, or create violence. None.

How about the 5 Occupy Participants arrested at the NATO Conference in Chicago making Pipe Bombs and Molotov Cocktails?

Does the term Black Bloc mean anything to you?

First, you have ZERO evidence that these tools were anything more than anarchists that may have attended an occupy rally at some point.

Second, they were NATO protestors trying to bomb an Obama office and target Mayor Emanuel.

I'm guessing you aren't going to find to many occupy movement folks with those people as a "target" for anything. These folks were your typical NATO protest nuts, nothing more. But whatever helps your disdain for occupy...

Several conservative groups helped support those that infiltrated Occupy Houston. There were three brave Patriots in their 20's that took two months off from their jobs and lived in Tranquility Park and who watched (and reported) everything that was going on in the Occupy Houston encampment.

These kids had ID's on every General Assembly Organizer, Facilitator, Moderator. They knew who was the connection with Occupy Groups in other cities, what Leftist Groups and Individuals made monetary contributions, who brought them their food, etc.

The vast majority of the support to these militant Occupy Houston participants (which in my opinion are domestic terrorists) came from Leftist groups and individuals outside of Houston, and Occupy Houston consistently followed the ideology of these groups.

When inside information on Occupy Houston started appearing on Tea Party websites and in the Media, Occupy Houston "protested" that the Houston Police infiltrated them. I'm sure HPD infiltrated them, but HPD didn't help Tea Party in any way.

Because they were infiltrated by private individuals who reported to Conservative groups, Occupy Houston tore itself apart looking for the "police informants". It was funny watching their paranoia. Now Occupy Houston has been co-opted by AFL-CIO and SEIU, and Environmental Extremist groups. The game starts again!

(08-22-2012 08:38 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  First, you have ZERO evidence that these tools were anything more than anarchists that may have attended an occupy rally at some point.

First, you have provided ZERO evidence that these tools aren't exactly what the occupy movement is made of.

At this point you pretend that they're different from the rest of the occupy protestors, but you provide no evidence to that. Nor have you ever.

You like to pretend you know can present something sensibly, but it's just another rwt failure.

Quote:Lastly...this stuff happened in May...just a few months ago. I thought the Occupy movement long since ended...lol

Who said that? People here just pointed out that interest (even by the media) has long since ended. But I'm pretty sure you're used to rejection.

(08-22-2012 10:53 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(08-22-2012 08:38 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  First, you have ZERO evidence that these tools were anything more than anarchists that may have attended an occupy rally at some point.

First, you have provided ZERO evidence that these tools aren't exactly what the occupy movement is made of.

At this point you pretend that they're different from the rest of the occupy protestors, but you provide no evidence to that. Nor have you ever.

You like to pretend you know can present something sensibly, but it's just another rwt failure.

Quote:Lastly...this stuff happened in May...just a few months ago. I thought the Occupy movement long since ended...lol

Who said that? People here just pointed out that interest (even by the media) has long since ended. But I'm pretty sure you're used to rejection.

Oh the Occupy dirtbags will be rioting next week at the Republican Convention. They never pass a chance for TV Time

(08-22-2012 10:53 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(08-22-2012 08:38 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  First, you have ZERO evidence that these tools were anything more than anarchists that may have attended an occupy rally at some point.

First, you have provided ZERO evidence that these tools aren't exactly what the occupy movement is made of.

At this point you pretend that they're different from the rest of the occupy protestors, but you provide no evidence to that. Nor have you ever.

You like to pretend you know can present something sensibly, but it's just another rwt failure.

Quote:Lastly...this stuff happened in May...just a few months ago. I thought the Occupy movement long since ended...lol

Who said that? People here just pointed out that interest (even by the media) has long since ended. But I'm pretty sure you're used to rejection.

WOW! You really ARE that stupid after all. If YOU are saying they are with Occupy, YOU have to prove that. You can't "prove" they aren't you stupid fool. What a moron!

Why don't you prove James Holmes wasn't a tea party member?

Better yet...why don't you prove you aren't dumb as a box of rocks?

These aren't clubs with member ID cards and attendance records.

But to play your foolish game that these three were actually Occupy protestors. There were most likely several hundred thousand Occupy protestors across the nation at some point. And what, maybe ten or so have done something like this (and that is likely a high number). Ten out of several hundred thousand...a miniscule percentage...would not be different than most of them? You fail math once again fool.

(08-22-2012 11:06 AM)Resident Idiot Wrote:  WOW! You really ARE that stupid after all. If YOU are saying they are with Occupy, YOU have to prove that. You can't "prove" they aren't you stupid fool. What a moron!

And then wrote

Quote:These aren't clubs with member ID cards and attendance records.

Exactly. So they were participating in an occupy event which means they were with occupy. Oh, and how many other occupy members went along w/ them?

It's even easier when you prove the point you're arguing against.

Quote:But to play your foolish game that these three were actually Occupy protestors. There were most likely several hundred thousand Occupy protestors across the nation at some point. And what, maybe ten or so have done something like this (and that is likely a high number). Ten out of several hundred thousand...a miniscule percentage...would not be different than most of them? You fail math once again fool.

Except we know there were many violent incidents from occupy members. And if you're dealing w/ small percentages, then why do you bring up criticisms of the TEA Party, when at best they are small percentages (and many were completely fabricated)?

tommy we know you don't like logic b/c it just keeps you looking stupid. Your equally stupid friends may be wowed by your ability to keep changing sides in an argument, but that doesn't work so well here.