Peer reviewed and everything.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/10/...te_change/

I was surprised that you hadn't posted that earlier. I was going to post a similar article.

Remember the NBC weather dude the other day who took a few days of really hot weather and said, "This is what global warming looks like."

Quote:Climate in northern Europe reconstructed for the past 2,000 years: Cooling trend calculated precisely for the first time

This is what global cooling really looks like

(07-10-2012 06:24 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  I was surprised that you hadn't posted that earlier. I was going to post a similar article.

Remember the NBC weather dude the other day who took a few days of really hot weather and said, "This is what global warming looks like."

Quote:Climate in northern Europe reconstructed for the past 2,000 years: Cooling trend calculated precisely for the first time

This is what global cooling really looks like

He, is a moron, but I've yet to see anything conclusive which shows the science is ultimately flawed. Their claims have in some cases been unarguably alarmist and overreaching, but there is enough reason to be concerned. Not too mention, I don't think anyone is arguing that it's good for the environment, just on quite how bad it is.

Anyone with any common sense knows that the climate has varied and gone through periods of extreme heat and cold. That is why it is called climate change. Nothing we do can stop it and all we can do is deal with it.

I've argued warming "good".

(07-10-2012 08:39 PM)Paul M Wrote:  I've argued warming "good".

I have to say that last week I would have said BS!! Damn it was hot here!!

I said warming, not hell hot.

(07-10-2012 08:33 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  That is why it is called climate change.

I thought it was called climate change so that no matter what's happening they can say "see, I told you."

(07-10-2012 08:39 PM)Paul M Wrote:  I've argued warming "good".

+1

^^That re-education is starting to take hold. Well done, comrade.

(07-10-2012 08:15 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(07-10-2012 06:24 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  I was surprised that you hadn't posted that earlier. I was going to post a similar article.

Remember the NBC weather dude the other day who took a few days of really hot weather and said, "This is what global warming looks like."

Quote:Climate in northern Europe reconstructed for the past 2,000 years: Cooling trend calculated precisely for the first time

This is what global cooling really looks like

He, is a moron, but I've yet to see anything conclusive which shows the science is ultimately flawed. Their claims have in some cases been unarguably alarmist and overreaching, but there is enough reason to be concerned. Not too mention, I don't think anyone is arguing that it's good for the environment, just on quite how bad it is.

Actually, there are a few morons on here that it is better for the environment. Given they aren't scientists(including Torchy here), it really isn't a surprise. The claim is there will be more land available for crops due to the warmer weather.

(07-10-2012 09:07 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-10-2012 08:33 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  That is why it is called climate change.

I thought it was called climate change so that no matter what's happening they can say "see, I told you."

+1

(07-10-2012 09:07 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-10-2012 08:33 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  That is why it is called climate change.

I thought it was called climate change so that no matter what's happening they can say "see, I told you."

As usual you are wrong and have no damn clue what the hell you are talking about. But the Republican party put it out as a talking point so it must be true.

(07-10-2012 09:14 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  ^^That re-education is starting to take hold. Well done, comrade.

Yep. "re-education" is the right word to describe it and seems quite appropriate.

(07-11-2012 12:14 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(07-10-2012 09:07 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-10-2012 08:33 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  That is why it is called climate change.

I thought it was called climate change so that no matter what's happening they can say "see, I told you."

As usual you are wrong and have no damn clue what the hell you are talking about. But the Republican party put it out as a talking point so it must be true.

I don't think anyone has actually said that. How can it be a talking point if nobody has said it?

(07-11-2012 12:31 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(07-11-2012 12:14 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(07-10-2012 09:07 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-10-2012 08:33 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  That is why it is called climate change.

I thought it was called climate change so that no matter what's happening they can say "see, I told you."

As usual you are wrong and have no damn clue what the hell you are talking about. But the Republican party put it out as a talking point so it must be true.

I don't think anyone has actually said that. How can it be a talking point if nobody has said it?

Out of touch much?

(07-11-2012 12:53 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(07-11-2012 12:31 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  

(07-11-2012 12:14 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(07-10-2012 09:07 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(07-10-2012 08:33 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  That is why it is called climate change.

I thought it was called climate change so that no matter what's happening they can say "see, I told you."

As usual you are wrong and have no damn clue what the hell you are talking about. But the Republican party put it out as a talking point so it must be true.

I don't think anyone has actually said that. How can it be a talking point if nobody has said it?

Out of touch much?

Do you have AC in your apartment? Naught boy, bad for the environment.