This same thing happened to Leon Spinks 30 years ago.

(06-22-2012 12:36 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(06-22-2012 12:32 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  Grills are so 70's.

Why did you just post a picture of Mitt Romney?

Yep, it's Romney and he is going to use those chompers to take a bite out of BO's butt this election...

(06-22-2012 12:44 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(06-22-2012 10:41 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Wow! So the owner of a caddy on 24's in the ghetto can't be a law abiding, tax paying citizen visiting their grandmother. Stereotype much? I hope that you aren't a cop or an employer.

sure firmbzzle. They are ALL visiting there granny's. Frim serious question for you...Have you ever been to the hood? If you are from Cincy I am pretty surpised you think grills and cady's on 24's belong to working, law abiding citizens... your average middle class and upper class african american doesn't even agree with that.

Why would a person who could afford a Yom Kipper Clipper stay in the hood if he didn't have to?

(06-22-2012 12:11 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  What is the difference between grills, chains and rings? Nothing. All are silly jewelry. Thieves steal jewelry.

As for stereotypes? I could give 2 sh!ts what you wear. Just don't expect me to hire your ass if you look like a clown. Ever wonder why you see so many of these jokers on the street? No one else wants to hire their stupid asses either.

When I retire, I am going into a new business. I am going to sell full length mirrors. From what I see walking around daily, lots of people don't have one.

I know right! People walking around wearing polka dots and strips, or brown shoes with black belts! Full length mirrors are what this country needs!

Nobody's really worn a grill since 2008

(06-22-2012 12:44 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(06-22-2012 10:41 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Wow! So the owner of a caddy on 24's in the ghetto can't be a law abiding, tax paying citizen visiting their grandmother. Stereotype much? I hope that you aren't a cop or an employer.

sure firmbzzle. They are ALL visiting there granny's. Frim serious question for you...Have you ever been to the hood? If you are from Cincy I am pretty surpised you think grills and cady's on 24's belong to working, law abiding citizens... your average middle class and upper class african american doesn't even agree with that.

No they aren't all visiting granny but it's not none either. Cincy is pretty conservative so I don't see many there but go to Atlanta, Jacksonville or Orlando and you will see plenty of law abiding Americans in escalades on 24's. Personally those and Lincoln Navi's are the only vehicles 24's should be put on.
People can do with their cars/trucks what they want to. I'm saying that rims and 24's are pretty common these days. 28-30's are a different story. Yes, I have been to the hood.

(06-22-2012 12:47 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(06-22-2012 12:44 PM)No Bull Wrote:  

(06-22-2012 10:41 AM)firmbizzle Wrote:  Wow! So the owner of a caddy on 24's in the ghetto can't be a law abiding, tax paying citizen visiting their grandmother. Stereotype much? I hope that you aren't a cop or an employer.

sure firmbzzle. They are ALL visiting there granny's. Frim serious question for you...Have you ever been to the hood? If you are from Cincy I am pretty surpised you think grills and cady's on 24's belong to working, law abiding citizens... your average middle class and upper class african american doesn't even agree with that.

Why would a person who could afford a Yom Kipper Clipper stay in the hood if he didn't have to?

The situation was somebody visiting a family member in the hood.

(06-22-2012 12:34 PM)Rebel Wrote:  Richard Kiel is 7'2". Richard Kiel can wear anything he wants/wanted.

He was great in the original "longest yard" with Burt Reynolds.

(06-22-2012 12:32 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  

the actor could only wear those fake-teeth for a few seconds at a time, they were so painful

once driving on the natchez trace. got pulled over for "following too close during hunting season." ranger said i had to be, i forget how far away, i imagine he made up the distance. i wasn't exactly close to the car in front of me, kept a reasonable distance behind the car in front of me. i don't drive fast. just three long haired dudes in the same car was probable cause. this was new year's day. we had been in new orleans prior. he gives me a sample of a field sobriety test which he said was standard for anyone he pulled over. it was just the eye test. didn't say anything about me being impaired to drive after the fact. then asked me if he can search my car and there was weed in the car. i knew that i could say no, nothing was in plain sight. long story short, i consented told him we had weed because i was 21 and a pushover. we get it all confiscated and a $500 fine and wasted three hours of our time. it was a long, quiet ride home.

was he right to pull me over? if that's how the law works, then yes. though i doubt he'd pull over a middle aged couple for following too close during hunting season. i hate the fact that he thought he found some ignorant toker. i've never boughten pot in my life, though i smoke occasionally. with that said, i fit the bill of a pot smoker. long hair, bumper sticker adorned car, flannel shirts... however i'm a libertarian and not a hippie. you wouldn't know it though, until you meet you.

(06-25-2012 11:55 AM)Lush Wrote:  then asked me if he can search my car and there was weed in the car. i knew that i could say no, nothing was in plain sight. long story short, i consented told him we had weed because i was 21 and a pushover.

if you had not consented, he could've (and probably would've, based on your account) detained you while a warrant was obtained. Basis of the warrant wouldve been his claim that he "smelled the odor of marijuana coming from your car. and the punishment would've been worse because he'd be angry at you for wasting his time (by forcing him to get the warrant).

Quote:was he right to pull me over? if that's how the law works, then yes.

i don't understand that

(06-25-2012 01:13 PM)Cardiff Wrote:  

(06-25-2012 11:55 AM)Lush Wrote:  then asked me if he can search my car and there was weed in the car. i knew that i could say no, nothing was in plain sight. long story short, i consented told him we had weed because i was 21 and a pushover.

if you had not consented, he could've (and probably would've, based on your account) detained you while a warrant was obtained. Basis of the warrant wouldve been his claim that he "smelled the odor of marijuana coming from your car. and the punishment would've been worse because he'd be angry at you for wasting his time (by forcing him to get the warrant).

Quote:was he right to pull me over? if that's how the law works, then yes.

i don't understand that

what i meant, was that if the way the law (following too closely during hunting season) was written, he was right to pull me over. and you really think that if i would have said no, he would have gone ahead and gotten a warrant? the only probable cause was three dudes with long hair and outta state plates.