You want to know what's some lame weak sauce? UTSA, Texas St, and UMASS will be in the upcoming release next month, but South is not.

http://www.landgrantholyland.com/2012/6/...am-ratings

Go ask them why not.

http://www.easports.com/ncaa-football#

I think this has more to do with USA not participating and sending its approval/statistics to EA than EA omitting USA. Any research done that showed UTSA/TState/Etc would also have shown USA. Marketing failure by USA. I sent feedback to EA anyway.

(06-06-2012 04:06 PM)Tiguar Wrote:  I think this has more to do with USA not participating and sending its approval/statistics to EA than EA omitting USA. Any research done that showed UTSA/TState/Etc would also have shown USA. Marketing failure by USA. I sent feedback to EA anyway.

I doubt this.

(06-06-2012 03:59 PM)BLEEDITRED Wrote:  You want to know what's some lame weak sauce? UTSA, Texas St, and UMASS will be in the upcoming release next month, but South is not.

http://www.landgrantholyland.com/2012/6/...am-ratings

Go ask them why not.

http://www.easports.com/ncaa-football#

South?

Interesting, FIU has the highest SBC ratings on the game, but was left as a 1 star program, while ASU drew the 2nd highest rating, but was upgraded to 2 stars...

(06-06-2012 04:07 PM)stAtecamera13 Wrote:  

(06-06-2012 03:59 PM)BLEEDITRED Wrote:  You want to know what's some lame weak sauce? UTSA, Texas St, and UMASS will be in the upcoming release next month, but South is not.

http://www.landgrantholyland.com/2012/6/...am-ratings

Go ask them why not.

http://www.easports.com/ncaa-football#

South?

What?

I do have an interesting question: Is USA left off the game because they are ineligible to win the league title? That might be one reason, though it may be the marketing thing Tiguar mentioned.

(06-06-2012 03:59 PM)BLEEDITRED Wrote:  You want to know what's some lame weak sauce? UTSA, Texas St, and UMASS will be in the upcoming release next month, but South is not.

http://www.landgrantholyland.com/2012/6/...am-ratings

Go ask them why not.

http://www.easports.com/ncaa-football#

Heeeey, Calm down .. I understand your dismay with utsa being listed, BUT taking umbrage with Texas St! Say it aint so . . . . .

@shaunlmason

"South Alabama will not be in NCAA Football 13, they announced too late to be included. Sorry.=( "

What?

(06-06-2012 04:27 PM)Bobcat87 Wrote:  

(06-06-2012 03:59 PM)BLEEDITRED Wrote:  You want to know what's some lame weak sauce? UTSA, Texas St, and UMASS will be in the upcoming release next month, but South is not.

http://www.landgrantholyland.com/2012/6/...am-ratings

Go ask them why not.

http://www.easports.com/ncaa-football#

Heeeey, Calm down .. I understand your dismay with utsa being listed, BUT taking umbrage with Texas St! Say it aint so . . . . .

I think you misunderstand. It's more the fact we are all the same NCAA category. Has nothing to do with the actual quality of schools listed.

(06-06-2012 04:13 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  I do have an interesting question: Is USA left off the game because they are ineligible to win the league title? That might be one reason, though it may be the marketing thing Tiguar mentioned.

Doubtful. I believe UTSA is in the same position, right?

(06-06-2012 04:29 PM)BLEEDITRED Wrote:  @shaunlmason

"South Alabama will not be in NCAA Football 13, they announced too late to be included. Sorry.=( "

What?

Well that is some BS.
I wish they had been honest and said "Whoops".

(06-06-2012 04:40 PM)Tiguar Wrote:  

(06-06-2012 04:27 PM)Bobcat87 Wrote:  

(06-06-2012 03:59 PM)BLEEDITRED Wrote:  You want to know what's some lame weak sauce? UTSA, Texas St, and UMASS will be in the upcoming release next month, but South is not.

http://www.landgrantholyland.com/2012/6/...am-ratings

Go ask them why not.

http://www.easports.com/ncaa-football#

Heeeey, Calm down .. I understand your dismay with utsa being listed, BUT taking umbrage with Texas St! Say it aint so . . . . .

I think you misunderstand. It's more the fact we are all the same NCAA category. Has nothing to do with the actual quality of schools listed.

Thanks for the clarification .. just didn't like my school being listed after the phrase: "...some lame weak sauce . . " lol . . . Re: category, you are most correct . . . and ya'll should have been included . . . . hoping ya put the wood to utsa when ya'll play 'em this year . . .

(06-06-2012 05:58 PM)Bobcat87 Wrote:  

(06-06-2012 04:40 PM)Tiguar Wrote:  

(06-06-2012 04:27 PM)Bobcat87 Wrote:  

(06-06-2012 03:59 PM)BLEEDITRED Wrote:  You want to know what's some lame weak sauce? UTSA, Texas St, and UMASS will be in the upcoming release next month, but South is not.

http://www.landgrantholyland.com/2012/6/...am-ratings

Go ask them why not.

http://www.easports.com/ncaa-football#

Heeeey, Calm down .. I understand your dismay with utsa being listed, BUT taking umbrage with Texas St! Say it aint so . . . . .

I think you misunderstand. It's more the fact we are all the same NCAA category. Has nothing to do with the actual quality of schools listed.

Thanks for the clarification .. just didn't like my school being listed after the phrase: "...some lame weak sauce . . " lol . . . Re: category, you are most correct . . . and ya'll should have been included . . . . hoping ya put the wood to utsa when ya'll play 'em this year . . .

Right, what Tiguar said. Lame sauce on EA's part. No reason we shouldn't be in if all of the other newbies are.

Sounds like an excuse for "we forgot".

@jdewiel is getting in on it now as well. Apparently works for EA.

"Long story short, we got the information that they'd be playing the schedule that they are. I don't have full details."

That statement makes no sense. Let him know it.

Wait, so I don't have to create a Bobcat team? Awesome!

(06-06-2012 07:41 PM)chrisattsu Wrote:  Wait, so I don't have to create a Bobcat team? Awesome!

you might still want too. You were given the generic 1 star program with D ratings on offense and defense. Itll take a year for EA to really rate you guys.

The other 3 newbies aren't eligible for conference titles or bowl berths this year either, are they?

@riley_easports
Musings from the Communications Director at EA SPORTS. Follow me for up to date EA SPORTS news with a bit of behind the scenes flavor.

@sandysandovalEA
Sr. Dir Athlete Relations EA Sports. It's in the game!

@ChrisErb
EA SPORTS - VP of Brand Marketing responsible for driving strategy and marketing for the EA SPORTS brand.

Go ask them what's up.

(06-07-2012 01:21 PM)BLEEDITRED Wrote:  The other 3 newbies aren't eligible for conference titles or bowl berths this year either, are they?

I'm pretty sure Texas State is eligible and UTSA is not. Not sure about UMASS.