Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
It is always assumed that Rutgers or Uconn would be #16..what about Lville?
Author Message
brista21 Offline
The Birthplace of College Football
*

Posts: 10,042
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 262
I Root For: Rutgers
Location: North Jersey

Donators
Post: #21
RE: It is always assumed that Rutgers or Uconn would be #16..what about Lville?
(05-18-2012 12:27 AM)ndlutz Wrote:  The biggest myth going in realignment is that somehow Rutgers adds NYC. Since nobody there cares about Rutgers this is a myth and you don't just magically get TV sets. Otherwise, though, I like Rutgers. They're hard to hate. Adding them to the conference, though? I don't think so.

You're right that on the East of Hudson we're not that relevant. But in NJ which is the 11th largest state we get more and more interest all the time. Playing Miami, FSU, GT, VT, Clemson, UNC, UVA, UMD, Cuse, Pitt etc. will only enhance that.

That being said if academics didn't matter to the ACC suddenly, I think they should and would go for Louisville. Too much basketball money being left on the table. And their football isn't half bad either.
(This post was last modified: 05-18-2012 09:00 AM by brista21.)
05-18-2012 08:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wolfman Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,459
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 181
I Root For: The Cartel
Location: Raleigh, NC
Post: #22
RE: It is always assumed that Rutgers or Uconn would be #16..what about Lville?
University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez. Yes, they are currently DII but their teams are called the "Tarzans" and "Janes." Now, that IS COOL! Plus how cool is this logo? I've (ahem) never seen anything like it!

[Image: Paw_logo.jpg]
05-18-2012 11:36 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ndlutz Offline
I am the liquor.
*

Posts: 2,541
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 91
I Root For: Pitt
Location: Pittsburgh
Post: #23
RE: It is always assumed that Rutgers or Uconn would be #16..what about Lville?
(05-18-2012 08:52 AM)brista21 Wrote:  
(05-18-2012 12:27 AM)ndlutz Wrote:  The biggest myth going in realignment is that somehow Rutgers adds NYC. Since nobody there cares about Rutgers this is a myth and you don't just magically get TV sets. Otherwise, though, I like Rutgers. They're hard to hate. Adding them to the conference, though? I don't think so.

You're right that on the East of Hudson we're not that relevant. But in NJ which is the 11th largest state we get more and more interest all the time. Playing Miami, FSU, GT, VT, Clemson, UNC, UVA, UMD, Cuse, Pitt etc. will only enhance that.

That being said if academics didn't matter to the ACC suddenly, I think they should and would go for Louisville. Too much basketball money being left on the table. And their football isn't half bad either.

I know that post sounded arrogant now that I look back on it and I truly didn't mean for it to come out that way. I agree that Rutgers is big (as it should be) in New Jersey.

I guess I'm just not in favor of further expansion with Big East teams right now. Even if we lose 2 members, 12 is a solid number.
05-18-2012 11:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
brista21 Offline
The Birthplace of College Football
*

Posts: 10,042
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 262
I Root For: Rutgers
Location: North Jersey

Donators
Post: #24
RE: It is always assumed that Rutgers or Uconn would be #16..what about Lville?
(05-18-2012 11:54 AM)ndlutz Wrote:  
(05-18-2012 08:52 AM)brista21 Wrote:  
(05-18-2012 12:27 AM)ndlutz Wrote:  The biggest myth going in realignment is that somehow Rutgers adds NYC. Since nobody there cares about Rutgers this is a myth and you don't just magically get TV sets. Otherwise, though, I like Rutgers. They're hard to hate. Adding them to the conference, though? I don't think so.

You're right that on the East of Hudson we're not that relevant. But in NJ which is the 11th largest state we get more and more interest all the time. Playing Miami, FSU, GT, VT, Clemson, UNC, UVA, UMD, Cuse, Pitt etc. will only enhance that.

That being said if academics didn't matter to the ACC suddenly, I think they should and would go for Louisville. Too much basketball money being left on the table. And their football isn't half bad either.

I know that post sounded arrogant now that I look back on it and I truly didn't mean for it to come out that way. I agree that Rutgers is big (as it should be) in New Jersey.

I guess I'm just not in favor of further expansion with Big East teams right now. Even if we lose 2 members, 12 is a solid number.

Understandable. Our problem is crossing that threshold from awareness and t-shirt wearing/bumper sticker sporting to constant sellouts and all eyes on the tube when we're playing. We really need to up the game that much further for that to happen.
05-18-2012 11:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.