(04-23-2012 09:43 AM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 09:01 AM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  Yea because our boy learning in a system that has developed great quarterbacks and learning under Aaron Rodgers is something we should all be against? You guys don't want the Bears to draft him because you think they waste talent, yet you don't want the Packers to draft him because you don't like them, despite the fact that they do great work with their players? So where should he go? New York? Atlanta?

Nah, you're overreacting Bleeds. We can still keep our hatred of the Packers and cheer on Chandler can't we? And, it's still fun to laugh at fans that are dumb enough to buy worthless shares of stock!

Green Bay Packers' stock: Hot, yet worthless

"Yesterday the team put up 250,000 shares for sale at $250 each and got 1,600 orders in the first 11 minutes. Pretty impressive considering it pays no dividends, the value doesn't increase and it has no resale value. So it's kind of like Greek treasury bonds.

The reigning Super Bowl champion Packers made the stock offering - its first since 1997 - to raise funds for renovations at Lambeau Field, the team's home in Green Bay, Wis. The team is the U.S.'s only non-profit, community-owned major league sports team. Founded in 1919, the Packers went public in 1923 and this sale marks only the fifth stock sale in team history.

The team makes no effort to hide the worthlessness of the stock."

I have no problem with him going to the Packers, I was astounded at those that thought that would be a bad destination for him. I would be thrilled with him learned under Aaron Rodgers. Back him up for a few years, then move on!

(04-23-2012 09:43 AM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 09:01 AM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  Yea because our boy learning in a system that has developed great quarterbacks and learning under Aaron Rodgers is something we should all be against? You guys don't want the Bears to draft him because you think they waste talent, yet you don't want the Packers to draft him because you don't like them, despite the fact that they do great work with their players? So where should he go? New York? Atlanta?

Nah, you're overreacting Bleeds. We can still keep our hatred of the Packers and cheer on Chandler can't we? And, it's still fun to laugh at fans that are dumb enough to buy worthless shares of stock!

Green Bay Packers' stock: Hot, yet worthless

"Yesterday the team put up 250,000 shares for sale at $250 each and got 1,600 orders in the first 11 minutes. Pretty impressive considering it pays no dividends, the value doesn't increase and it has no resale value. So it's kind of like Greek treasury bonds.

The reigning Super Bowl champion Packers made the stock offering - its first since 1997 - to raise funds for renovations at Lambeau Field, the team's home in Green Bay, Wis. The team is the U.S.'s only non-profit, community-owned major league sports team. Founded in 1919, the Packers went public in 1923 and this sale marks only the fifth stock sale in team history.

The team makes no effort to hide the worthlessness of the stock."

PLEASE! You WISH the Bears were a publicly owned team. It really is the best thing ever. Packers will never leave. We never have an old ass owner to run us into the ground. Its really something quite special that fans cherish. It has nothing to do with making a profit. Something you can't understand. Its about owning a small piece of your favorite team.

(04-23-2012 01:41 PM)niuguy Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 09:43 AM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 09:01 AM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  Yea because our boy learning in a system that has developed great quarterbacks and learning under Aaron Rodgers is something we should all be against? You guys don't want the Bears to draft him because you think they waste talent, yet you don't want the Packers to draft him because you don't like them, despite the fact that they do great work with their players? So where should he go? New York? Atlanta?

Nah, you're overreacting Bleeds. We can still keep our hatred of the Packers and cheer on Chandler can't we? And, it's still fun to laugh at fans that are dumb enough to buy worthless shares of stock!

Green Bay Packers' stock: Hot, yet worthless

"Yesterday the team put up 250,000 shares for sale at $250 each and got 1,600 orders in the first 11 minutes. Pretty impressive considering it pays no dividends, the value doesn't increase and it has no resale value. So it's kind of like Greek treasury bonds.

The reigning Super Bowl champion Packers made the stock offering - its first since 1997 - to raise funds for renovations at Lambeau Field, the team's home in Green Bay, Wis. The team is the U.S.'s only non-profit, community-owned major league sports team. Founded in 1919, the Packers went public in 1923 and this sale marks only the fifth stock sale in team history.

The team makes no effort to hide the worthlessness of the stock."

PLEASE! You WISH the Bears were a publicly owned team. It really is the best thing ever. Packers will never leave. We never have an old ass owner to run us into the ground. Its really something quite special that fans cherish. It has nothing to do with making a profit. Something you can't understand. Its about owning a small piece of your favorite team.

(04-23-2012 01:41 PM)niuguy Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 09:43 AM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 09:01 AM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  Yea because our boy learning in a system that has developed great quarterbacks and learning under Aaron Rodgers is something we should all be against? You guys don't want the Bears to draft him because you think they waste talent, yet you don't want the Packers to draft him because you don't like them, despite the fact that they do great work with their players? So where should he go? New York? Atlanta?

Nah, you're overreacting Bleeds. We can still keep our hatred of the Packers and cheer on Chandler can't we? And, it's still fun to laugh at fans that are dumb enough to buy worthless shares of stock!

Green Bay Packers' stock: Hot, yet worthless

"Yesterday the team put up 250,000 shares for sale at $250 each and got 1,600 orders in the first 11 minutes. Pretty impressive considering it pays no dividends, the value doesn't increase and it has no resale value. So it's kind of like Greek treasury bonds.

The reigning Super Bowl champion Packers made the stock offering - its first since 1997 - to raise funds for renovations at Lambeau Field, the team's home in Green Bay, Wis. The team is the U.S.'s only non-profit, community-owned major league sports team. Founded in 1919, the Packers went public in 1923 and this sale marks only the fifth stock sale in team history.

The team makes no effort to hide the worthlessness of the stock."

PLEASE! You WISH the Bears were a publicly owned team. It really is the best thing ever. Packers will never leave. We never have an old ass owner to run us into the ground. Its really something quite special that fans cherish. It has nothing to do with making a profit. Something you can't understand. Its about owning a small piece of your favorite team.

You don't own ANYTHING. You have no voting rights on any operational decisions. The stock certificates are worthless pieces of paper, nothing more. But if it makes you feel better to shell out $250, frame the certificate and mount it on your wall, have at it.

I'm sure all the other NFL owners would love for their teams to be "publicly" owned. But they know that their fans aren't gullible enough to fall for it. To quote a Packer fan from an ESPN story, "I could have just as well thrown my money out the window for what I get for it, other than a feel-good."

Link

(04-23-2012 02:02 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 01:41 PM)niuguy Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 09:43 AM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 09:01 AM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  Yea because our boy learning in a system that has developed great quarterbacks and learning under Aaron Rodgers is something we should all be against? You guys don't want the Bears to draft him because you think they waste talent, yet you don't want the Packers to draft him because you don't like them, despite the fact that they do great work with their players? So where should he go? New York? Atlanta?

Nah, you're overreacting Bleeds. We can still keep our hatred of the Packers and cheer on Chandler can't we? And, it's still fun to laugh at fans that are dumb enough to buy worthless shares of stock!

Green Bay Packers' stock: Hot, yet worthless

"Yesterday the team put up 250,000 shares for sale at $250 each and got 1,600 orders in the first 11 minutes. Pretty impressive considering it pays no dividends, the value doesn't increase and it has no resale value. So it's kind of like Greek treasury bonds.

The reigning Super Bowl champion Packers made the stock offering - its first since 1997 - to raise funds for renovations at Lambeau Field, the team's home in Green Bay, Wis. The team is the U.S.'s only non-profit, community-owned major league sports team. Founded in 1919, the Packers went public in 1923 and this sale marks only the fifth stock sale in team history.

The team makes no effort to hide the worthlessness of the stock."

PLEASE! You WISH the Bears were a publicly owned team. It really is the best thing ever. Packers will never leave. We never have an old ass owner to run us into the ground. Its really something quite special that fans cherish. It has nothing to do with making a profit. Something you can't understand. Its about owning a small piece of your favorite team.

You don't own ANYTHING. You have no voting rights on any operational decisions. The stock certificates are worthless pieces of paper, nothing more. But if it makes you feel better to shell out $250, frame the certificate and mount it on your wall, have at it.

I'm sure all the other NFL owners would love for their teams to be "publicly" owned. But they know that their fans aren't gullible enough to fall for it. To quote a Packer fan from an ESPN story, "I could have just as well thrown my money out the window for what I get for it, other than a feel-good."

Link

Not true, Bob.

(04-23-2012 02:07 PM)Dog Fan Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 02:02 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 01:41 PM)niuguy Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 09:43 AM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 09:01 AM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  Yea because our boy learning in a system that has developed great quarterbacks and learning under Aaron Rodgers is something we should all be against? You guys don't want the Bears to draft him because you think they waste talent, yet you don't want the Packers to draft him because you don't like them, despite the fact that they do great work with their players? So where should he go? New York? Atlanta?

Nah, you're overreacting Bleeds. We can still keep our hatred of the Packers and cheer on Chandler can't we? And, it's still fun to laugh at fans that are dumb enough to buy worthless shares of stock!

Green Bay Packers' stock: Hot, yet worthless

"Yesterday the team put up 250,000 shares for sale at $250 each and got 1,600 orders in the first 11 minutes. Pretty impressive considering it pays no dividends, the value doesn't increase and it has no resale value. So it's kind of like Greek treasury bonds.

The reigning Super Bowl champion Packers made the stock offering - its first since 1997 - to raise funds for renovations at Lambeau Field, the team's home in Green Bay, Wis. The team is the U.S.'s only non-profit, community-owned major league sports team. Founded in 1919, the Packers went public in 1923 and this sale marks only the fifth stock sale in team history.

The team makes no effort to hide the worthlessness of the stock."

PLEASE! You WISH the Bears were a publicly owned team. It really is the best thing ever. Packers will never leave. We never have an old ass owner to run us into the ground. Its really something quite special that fans cherish. It has nothing to do with making a profit. Something you can't understand. Its about owning a small piece of your favorite team.

You don't own ANYTHING. You have no voting rights on any operational decisions. The stock certificates are worthless pieces of paper, nothing more. But if it makes you feel better to shell out $250, frame the certificate and mount it on your wall, have at it.

I'm sure all the other NFL owners would love for their teams to be "publicly" owned. But they know that their fans aren't gullible enough to fall for it. To quote a Packer fan from an ESPN story, "I could have just as well thrown my money out the window for what I get for it, other than a feel-good."

Link

Not true, Bob.

Explain.

(04-23-2012 02:10 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 02:07 PM)Dog Fan Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 02:02 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 01:41 PM)niuguy Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 09:43 AM)huskiebob Wrote:  Nah, you're overreacting Bleeds. We can still keep our hatred of the Packers and cheer on Chandler can't we? And, it's still fun to laugh at fans that are dumb enough to buy worthless shares of stock!

Green Bay Packers' stock: Hot, yet worthless

"Yesterday the team put up 250,000 shares for sale at $250 each and got 1,600 orders in the first 11 minutes. Pretty impressive considering it pays no dividends, the value doesn't increase and it has no resale value. So it's kind of like Greek treasury bonds.

The reigning Super Bowl champion Packers made the stock offering - its first since 1997 - to raise funds for renovations at Lambeau Field, the team's home in Green Bay, Wis. The team is the U.S.'s only non-profit, community-owned major league sports team. Founded in 1919, the Packers went public in 1923 and this sale marks only the fifth stock sale in team history.

The team makes no effort to hide the worthlessness of the stock."

PLEASE! You WISH the Bears were a publicly owned team. It really is the best thing ever. Packers will never leave. We never have an old ass owner to run us into the ground. Its really something quite special that fans cherish. It has nothing to do with making a profit. Something you can't understand. Its about owning a small piece of your favorite team.

You don't own ANYTHING. You have no voting rights on any operational decisions. The stock certificates are worthless pieces of paper, nothing more. But if it makes you feel better to shell out $250, frame the certificate and mount it on your wall, have at it.

I'm sure all the other NFL owners would love for their teams to be "publicly" owned. But they know that their fans aren't gullible enough to fall for it. To quote a Packer fan from an ESPN story, "I could have just as well thrown my money out the window for what I get for it, other than a feel-good."

Link

Not true, Bob.

Explain.

Packers stocholders vote annually for the board members. They can attend shareholders meetings (usually at Lambeau) and get a tour of Lambeau.

(04-23-2012 03:16 PM)Dog Fan Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 02:10 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 02:07 PM)Dog Fan Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 02:02 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 01:41 PM)niuguy Wrote:  PLEASE! You WISH the Bears were a publicly owned team. It really is the best thing ever. Packers will never leave. We never have an old ass owner to run us into the ground. Its really something quite special that fans cherish. It has nothing to do with making a profit. Something you can't understand. Its about owning a small piece of your favorite team.

You don't own ANYTHING. You have no voting rights on any operational decisions. The stock certificates are worthless pieces of paper, nothing more. But if it makes you feel better to shell out $250, frame the certificate and mount it on your wall, have at it.

I'm sure all the other NFL owners would love for their teams to be "publicly" owned. But they know that their fans aren't gullible enough to fall for it. To quote a Packer fan from an ESPN story, "I could have just as well thrown my money out the window for what I get for it, other than a feel-good."

Link

Not true, Bob.

Explain.

Packers stocholders vote annually for the board members. They can attend shareholders meetings (usually at Lambeau) and get a tour of Lambeau.

I got a tour of Soldier Field for attending their draft party a few years back. Much cheaper than $250.

(04-23-2012 03:47 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 03:16 PM)Dog Fan Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 02:10 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 02:07 PM)Dog Fan Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 02:02 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  You don't own ANYTHING. You have no voting rights on any operational decisions. The stock certificates are worthless pieces of paper, nothing more. But if it makes you feel better to shell out $250, frame the certificate and mount it on your wall, have at it.

I'm sure all the other NFL owners would love for their teams to be "publicly" owned. But they know that their fans aren't gullible enough to fall for it. To quote a Packer fan from an ESPN story, "I could have just as well thrown my money out the window for what I get for it, other than a feel-good."

Link

Not true, Bob.

Explain.

Packers stocholders vote annually for the board members. They can attend shareholders meetings (usually at Lambeau) and get a tour of Lambeau.

I got a tour of Soldier Field for attending their draft party a few years back. Much cheaper than $250.

To tour Soldier Field, they should have paid you.

(04-23-2012 04:46 PM)Dog Fan Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 03:47 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 03:16 PM)Dog Fan Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 02:10 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 02:07 PM)Dog Fan Wrote:  Not true, Bob.

Explain.

Packers stocholders vote annually for the board members. They can attend shareholders meetings (usually at Lambeau) and get a tour of Lambeau.

I got a tour of Soldier Field for attending their draft party a few years back. Much cheaper than $250.

To tour Soldier Field, they should have paid you.

Hey, the Huskies and Bears play in Soldier Field. That's good enough for me!

(04-23-2012 04:52 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 04:46 PM)Dog Fan Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 03:47 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 03:16 PM)Dog Fan Wrote:  

(04-23-2012 02:10 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  Explain.

Packers stocholders vote annually for the board members. They can attend shareholders meetings (usually at Lambeau) and get a tour of Lambeau.

I got a tour of Soldier Field for attending their draft party a few years back. Much cheaper than $250.

To tour Soldier Field, they should have paid you.

Hey, the Huskies and Bears play in Soldier Field. That's good enough for me!

I'd much rather have a tour of Huskie Stadium, complete with Joe's old office and the urinal trough. Now that's history with lots of meaning!!

I couldn't read anything about chandler harnish in this article, does it mention him in the espn + part?