Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Bracket Buster Blues
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
bronconick Offline
Hockey Nut
*

Posts: 9,229
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation: 193
I Root For: WMU/FSU
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Bracket Buster Blues
(02-21-2012 05:15 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  GF68 - with all due respect, I was bashing this thing well before we (MAC) crapped the bed this year.

While some (from the east) may say something dumb like, "if it helps just ONE MAC team, we should do it," my position is that if it is not helping most teams and in some cases (travel) is a hardship, why bother participating?

I see little of value to it and am deeply suspicious of anything that ESPN touches because we know that they don't really care about anything except their beloved BCS (football) and Power Six Conferences (hoops). I'm waiting until they start including AQ teams in the event for the inevitable creep to the big audience ratings that drive ESPN. It's probably only a matter of time.

A much better alternative would be to pair up good mid-majors against the middle of the pack power six teams, which always coincidently happen to crowd out deserving mid-majors when the dance field gets announced. Not only pair them up, but make the power six teams travel to the mid-major (which, we all know, they abhor). The mid-major can give them a return game the following year. Under THIS proposal, we won't have to see teams in the NCAA tourney from the power conferences that couldn't even go .500 in their league while playing mostly home OOC games. Now, THAT would be an actual bracket buster.

Of course, the power conferences would howl and protest to protect their kingdom and this kind of proposal has no chance to advance. If you really want to "bust some brackets" it should start will all the borderline teams from power six conferences that crowd out deserving mid-majors. These leagues have an entitlement mentality where they believe that their also-rans are more deserving than a mid-major that doesn't have all the built in advantages and had to actually play non conference games on the road.

Non Big 6 conference at-large bids before and after the "bracketbuster" started in 2003

2011 7
2010 8
2009 4
2008 6
2007 6
2006 8
2005 9
2004 12
2003 10
2002 7
2001 6
2000 7
1999 10 (last time the MAC has two teams)

We're not getting anything out of this setup. All the Bracketbuster really is is an elimination game for the loser.
(This post was last modified: 02-22-2012 09:53 AM by bronconick.)
02-22-2012 09:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Polish Hammer Offline
King of all Dukes
*

Posts: 14,800
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 156
I Root For: Kent State/James Madison
Location:
Post: #22
RE: Bracket Buster Blues
Exactly, spread more Ls around for the boys so the big boys have one more reason to discredit them.
02-22-2012 11:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.