WMU Broncos

Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Annual PWR Complaint: Why Are We Considering Providence?
Author Message
suum_cuique171 Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 233
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation: 7
I Root For: Bronco
Location: DC
Post: #1
Annual PWR Complaint: Why Are We Considering Providence?
http://www.westerncollegehockeyblog.com/...providence

I have no idea how it all works nor do i want to spend time figuring it out, but i agree with the author--northeastern, alaska and providence should have no shot to making the tournament. With a 20 team cap, would we still be in the running this year?
02-16-2012 09:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


bronconick Offline
Hockey Nut
*

Posts: 9,236
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation: 193
I Root For: WMU/FSU
Location:
Post: #2
RE: Annual PWR Complaint: Why Are We Considering Providence?
They had a 25 team cap for a couple years until midway through last season. We benefited then from the change to everyone over .500 in RPI because MSU and someone else WMU swept finished in the range between 25th and 30th where the RPI dropped below .500. It moved WMU into the 3 line instead of a 4 seed.

All he's debating is where the thick black line should be drawn.

As to this year, I think we'd benefit slightly from it being cut at 25 again and significantly from it being at 20 due to the strength of the CCHA (only 1 CCHA team is between 20-32, 4 WCHA, 3 Hockey East, 3 ECAC).....which is probably why they changed it back to the current rule.

I could see them shrinking it down more after the conference changes since at least the Big Ten and NCHC will be playing few conference games. Not sure what everyone else is doing yet.

Edit: Hell, if they change the name from "Teams under Consideration" to "Teams over .500 RPI" for that line, it solves his complaint. As long as they're using a (admittedly poorly written) math formula for the tournament, there is no way for Providence to make the tournament as an at-large right now even if they're "Under Consideration." The same is true for WMU, North Dakota and Notre Dame in this snapshot.
(This post was last modified: 02-16-2012 10:00 AM by bronconick.)
02-16-2012 09:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.