On the Temple message boards, there are threads going about FOUR different conference destinations for our feathered friends! One for the Big East, one for the ACC, one for the CUSA/MWC alliance and one for standing pat with the MAC/A10. Link

(02-10-2012 06:01 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  On the Temple message boards, there are threads going about FOUR different conference destinations for our feathered friends! One for the Big East, one for the ACC, one for the CUSA/MWC alliance and one for standing pat with the MAC/A10. Link

Yep, and they won't win a league title in any of them.

(02-10-2012 07:37 PM)beachboy Wrote:  

(02-10-2012 06:01 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  On the Temple message boards, there are threads going about FOUR different conference destinations for our feathered friends! One for the Big East, one for the ACC, one for the CUSA/MWC alliance and one for standing pat with the MAC/A10. Link

Yep, and they won't win a league title in any of them.

lolz @ Bob using "lol"

(02-10-2012 09:17 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  lolz @ Bob using "lol"

lmao @ Bleeds "lolz" @ me using "lol"

Memphis has taken the last slot in the Big East. The ACC is out of the question for Temple, CUSA/MWC is a possibility with Memphis and UCF leaving, but is that so much better than the MAC? Best advice is stay in the MAC especially since with UMass and UB the MAC has an East Coast presence.

(02-10-2012 10:04 PM)brandsxb Wrote:  Memphis has taken the last slot in the Big East. The ACC is out of the question for Temple, CUSA/MWC is a possibility with Memphis and UCF leaving, but is that so much better than the MAC? Best advice is stay in the MAC especially since with UMass and UB the MAC has an East Coast presence.

Temple was the worst football program in the history of college football. The only reason Al Golden and temple had some success was they got in a conference in which they could compete in and in spite of that, they have not won a title. Temple is missing one component that all MAC teams have: a stadium on campus which is a big negative. Lets see how many titles has Marshall won since getting into the sprawled CUSA.

Marshall was the big team to move to CUSA and UCF was an after thought. Now Marshall is left alone in a splintered conference and UCF is in the Big East.

(02-10-2012 07:37 PM)beachboy Wrote:  

(02-10-2012 06:01 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  On the Temple message boards, there are threads going about FOUR different conference destinations for our feathered friends! One for the Big East, one for the ACC, one for the CUSA/MWC alliance and one for standing pat with the MAC/A10. Link

Yep, and they won't win a league title in any of them.

You are hilarious

(02-11-2012 08:51 AM)gcd Wrote:  Temple is missing one component that all MAC teams have: a stadium on campus which is a big negative.

http://www.miami.edu/

(02-13-2012 08:27 PM)JHG722 Wrote:  

(02-11-2012 08:51 AM)gcd Wrote:  Temple is missing one component that all MAC teams have: a stadium on campus which is a big negative.

http://www.miami.edu/

And your point is?

(02-10-2012 10:04 PM)brandsxb Wrote:  Memphis has taken the last slot in the Big East. The ACC is out of the question for Temple, CUSA/MWC is a possibility with Memphis and UCF leaving, but is that so much better than the MAC? Best advice is stay in the MAC especially since with UMass and UB the MAC has an East Coast presence.

Not as old as me....

It all goes back to this...Temple-lol

Well, if Temple is able to convince yet another conference to let them in football only for no particular benefit, I guess more power to them.

(02-13-2012 08:44 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 08:27 PM)JHG722 Wrote:  

(02-11-2012 08:51 AM)gcd Wrote:  Temple is missing one component that all MAC teams have: a stadium on campus which is a big negative.

http://www.miami.edu/

And your point is?

Have you ever seen the stadium Miami plays in?

(02-13-2012 11:12 PM)JHG722 Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 08:44 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 08:27 PM)JHG722 Wrote:  

(02-11-2012 08:51 AM)gcd Wrote:  Temple is missing one component that all MAC teams have: a stadium on campus which is a big negative.

http://www.miami.edu/

And your point is?

Have you ever seen the stadium Miami plays in?

I'd ask the same thing about Temple's stadium, but the obvious answer is 0 seeing as no one cares about Temple football or Mike Vick.

(02-13-2012 11:12 PM)JHG722 Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 08:44 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 08:27 PM)JHG722 Wrote:  

(02-11-2012 08:51 AM)gcd Wrote:  Temple is missing one component that all MAC teams have: a stadium on campus which is a big negative.

http://www.miami.edu/

And your point is?

Have you ever seen the stadium Miami plays in?

The original point was that it was a negative for a MAC school to have to play in an off-campus stadium. The link you gave was for Miami of Florida. Not hardly a MAC school.

(02-13-2012 11:15 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 11:12 PM)JHG722 Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 08:44 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 08:27 PM)JHG722 Wrote:  

(02-11-2012 08:51 AM)gcd Wrote:  Temple is missing one component that all MAC teams have: a stadium on campus which is a big negative.

http://www.miami.edu/

And your point is?

Have you ever seen the stadium Miami plays in?

I'd ask the same thing about Temple's stadium, but the obvious answer is 0 seeing as no one cares about Temple football or Mike Vick.

Coming from an NIU fan? Seriously?

Temple has a football team?

(02-14-2012 01:29 AM)JHG722 Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 11:15 PM)BleedsHuskieRed Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 11:12 PM)JHG722 Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 08:44 PM)huskiebob Wrote:  

(02-13-2012 08:27 PM)JHG722 Wrote:  http://www.miami.edu/

And your point is?

Have you ever seen the stadium Miami plays in?

I'd ask the same thing about Temple's stadium, but the obvious answer is 0 seeing as no one cares about Temple football or Mike Vick.

Coming from an NIU fan? Seriously?

How is the MAC working out for you? Leave.