Ready to hear Paul on pro-life.

Booooooooooo

Way to go crowd.

Ron Paul! Ron Paul! Ron Paul! They tried to skip him again.

(01-19-2012 09:42 PM)Dak10 Wrote:  

(01-19-2012 09:36 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(01-19-2012 09:33 PM)Dak10 Wrote:  

(01-19-2012 09:27 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(01-19-2012 09:20 PM)Dak10 Wrote:  Santorum goes idiot. I want to hear boo's. He just caim out in support of SOPA, wants to restrict Internet.

Some of you really need your ears checked.

Some of us also need to learn to spell, haha.

He said he supports government enforced restrictions on the internet. He went full retard.

When it comes to property rights. Said straight up he was against sopa.

More to it than that.

"The Internet is not a free zone where anybody can do anything they want."

I disagree.

You keep selectively ignoring every other sentence. He specifically was talking about stealing other peoples property.

(01-19-2012 09:43 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(01-19-2012 09:36 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  

(01-19-2012 09:29 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  1. The lawsuit was over a dispute that occurred before Clinton was president. Not on-point to the perjury case.

1. But the lawsuit was filed while he was President in 94.

But that doesn't go to the issue of whether a president can be impeached for actions taken before he took office. I think not. I do think, however, that he CAN be (judicial discretion comes into play here) rightly compelled to answer a civil complaint about such actions while holding office. That is the essential holding of Clinton-v-Jones, as I read it.

We aren't far off on our view of this....just the endgame.

BTW, I do think it is possible to impeach a President for actions preceding his Presidency but it would be an answer to a constitutional crisis where there is no procedure to remove a President(assuming they dont resign) other than impeachment. The one example I can think of off the top of my head(and maybe not a great one) is if there was irrevertable proof that Obama wasn't a natural born citizen. There is no constitutional procedure for removing someone who is ineligible for the Presidency once they are sworn in other than impeachment.

Wow. Absolutely outstanding answer by Paul about how morality changes and the law follows up. That's the best answer I've seen him give on any subject in any debate.

And that line to Santorum calling him overly sensitive was pretty funny.

Total home run by Paul. And the closing comment on how you repeal Roe v Wade overnight by letting states decide was great.

(01-19-2012 09:47 PM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  Best answer Mitt has had on the pro-life issue.

yea, he made Newt look "loose" with the truth....which he is.

Paul did great with the pro-life crowd there.

Yep, Paul did great there.

Zero FP questions asked tonight, which is why (in my slightly biased opinion) Ron Paul was the clear winner tonight.

It's hard for me to see an argument were anyone did better. Maybe as good, not better.

It makes me sick to hear Santorum talk about preserving freedom. Such a hypocrite.

Does Santorum really think he could beat Obama. Surely he isn't that delusional. He is the only candidate in which I can't find a single scenario in which he could beat Obama.

(01-19-2012 10:03 PM)Dak10 Wrote:  Does Santorum really think he could beat Obama. Surely he isn't that delusional.

Paul and Romney are the only one's on that stage that could beat Obama without the help of some major world changing event.

Ron Paul did much better tonight than Monday. Much of that had to do with a less involved crowd.

Maybe its my antiRomney bias and so on but why does it look like he's going to spit fire on the other 3 candidates when they are talking. You can almost see his disdain in his eyes. Is anyone else noticing this observation of mine? LMAO

It always looks like Romney is doing math in his head when the other guys are talking.

(01-19-2012 10:05 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  Paul and Romney are the only one's on that stage that could beat Obama without the help of some major world changing event.

+1

Ron Paul's the only one that doesn't spew hypocritical lies the whole time. I think he's the only one of them that has the chance to beat Obama.

(01-19-2012 10:20 PM)aTxTIGER Wrote:  It always looks like Romney is doing math in his head when the other guys are talking.

Calculating the interest on his Cayman accounts?