(11-11-2011 11:17 AM)Redwingtom Wrote: If absolutely NOTHING happened, why would the NRA have paid off the women? I know...to avoid a trial...but if there was ZERO merit I'm sure it would have been thrown out of any court in a heartbeat. The NRA certainly would have a legal team already on the payroll, no?
If it's going to cost $50,000 to get to the point of getting it thrown out, and if they're willing to settle for $25,000, then why would you not settle? Particularly since the settlement was apparently negotiated not by Cain but by the NRA, which really had no dog in the fight as far a guilt or innocence.
I don't know that those are the actual numbers, but they're probably not far off in 1996 or so. Even if the claim has no merit, you're going to have to do a bunch of due diligence before you can reach that conclusion.
The flip side of the coin is that if there was actual merit, this is a 10x salary lawsuit. I'm guessing her attorney a) knew that, and b) took the case on a contingent basis. So any settlement less than about half a million calls into question the legitimacy of the claims.
You can read whatever you want into whatever information is reported. But a "five figure settlement" which is all that I've seen looks to me a lot more like a BS lawsuit than a legitimate claim. And I've litigated a few, including a few with this subject matter.
Tell me that you were all over Bill Clinton demanding that he resign in the wake of the Monica Lewinsky and other scandals, and I'll give you more credibility on this. But I'm guessing you can't tell me that, at least not honestly.
As for me, I didn't jump all over Bill and I'm not going to jump all over Herman. I think that's a sensible and objective response to both.