(10-29-2011 06:30 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  

2012 GOP Campaign poster, maybe???

Not even close to the truth.

Ummmm, Robert? They're cartoons.

(10-30-2011 12:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Ummmm, Robert? They're cartoons.

Really? Wow. I had no idea. THanks. Seriously, while some may have been slightly funny, I was responding to the title, which was to characterize the cartoons as who the protesters are and the cartoons are FAR from the truth.

(10-30-2011 12:49 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-30-2011 12:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Ummmm, Robert? They're cartoons.

Really? Wow. I had no idea. THanks. Seriously, while some may have been slightly funny, I was responding to the title, which was to characterize the cartoons as who the protesters are and the cartoons are FAR from the truth.

It's satire.

(noun) - the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc.

I should probably speak/type slower...

(10-30-2011 09:29 AM)TampaKnight Wrote:  

(10-30-2011 12:49 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-30-2011 12:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Ummmm, Robert? They're cartoons.

Really? Wow. I had no idea. THanks. Seriously, while some may have been slightly funny, I was responding to the title, which was to characterize the cartoons as who the protesters are and the cartoons are FAR from the truth.

It's satire.

(noun) - the use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like, in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, etc.

I should probably speak/type slower...

I understand that. My point was that he claimed that the cartoons were a true reflection of the movement and that is not the case. Do you need me to speak/type slower? I know the Floriduh edumacation system sucks but I was hoping you were a little smarter than that. Apparently I was wrong.

They look about right to me.

(10-30-2011 01:41 PM)Rebel Wrote:  They look about right to me.

They would to someone who has no clue as to who the protesters are or what they want.

(10-30-2011 02:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-30-2011 01:41 PM)Rebel Wrote:  They look about right to me.

They would to someone who has no clue as to who the protesters are or what they want.

Kinda like you and the tea party, huh?

(10-30-2011 02:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-30-2011 01:41 PM)Rebel Wrote:  They look about right to me.

They would to someone who has no clue as to who the protesters are or what they want.

Do you not have a TV? Newspapers?

(10-30-2011 02:38 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(10-30-2011 02:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(10-30-2011 01:41 PM)Rebel Wrote:  They look about right to me.

They would to someone who has no clue as to who the protesters are or what they want.

Do you not have a TV? Newspapers?

Do you get anything but Fox boobs and Propagandamax?

(10-30-2011 02:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  They would to someone who has no clue as to who the protesters are or what they want.

We know exactly what they want.... To be bailed out for all their poor decisions. To have their debts forgiven, to have some of MY tax dollars handed to them just because they exist. They are leaches on this economy and everyone who pays into the system.

The last one is dead on. Can't tell you how many video clips I've seen from OWS with 'protesters' using iphones and ipads.

(10-29-2011 06:52 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

I like these two in particular.

(11-05-2011 10:37 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

Nice.

(11-05-2011 10:37 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

very good.

It's great entertainment here where liberals support something they don't even know what it is. Just like people think democrats are for democracy but its actually socialism and communism. Democrats are delusional.