Maybe the next time there's a person that gets shot by a .22 and gets away, he'll break in on Robert when he gets more brazen and more violent....which WILL happen.

That'll rid us of the "kill'em with kindness" naive f'er.

No Robert, I don't want you dead. I want you to have some common Gdamn sense. ...and you're lacking even one ounce of it here.

(08-07-2011 10:32 PM)Rebel Wrote:  No Robert, I don't want you dead. I want you to have some common Gdamn sense. ...and you're lacking even one ounce of it here.

You lie.

(08-07-2011 10:34 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(08-07-2011 10:32 PM)Rebel Wrote:  No Robert, I don't want you dead. I want you to have some common Gdamn sense. ...and you're lacking even one ounce of it here.

You lie.

Not about your common sense. As for wanting you dead, stupid and naive people are killed daily. You're the type that would pick up a hitchhiker in a goalie mask. You're a naive fool. There IS evil in the world, moron, and your moral relativism BS doesn't work on me. I do have common sense. I don't want you dead; I want you to wake the f*ck up.

(08-07-2011 10:37 PM)Rebel Wrote:  stupid and naive people are killed daily.

And yet we have seatbelt and helmet laws.

(08-05-2011 12:13 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(08-05-2011 12:10 PM)RobertN Wrote:  9 times, huh? Sounds like she needs to het more practice shooting a gun at the range or this story is BS and the "intruder" was a boyfriend(I guess ex-boyfriend now).

It was a .22, shortbus. Not exactly a high-powered round.

(08-05-2011 06:10 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(08-05-2011 05:49 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  9 times??? Sounds like she should go to jail for life like this guy.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43710936/ns/...jxywmFjuSo

There's no reason to shoot someone 9 times. Of course women can get away with anything.

Dude still had enough juice to get out of the house and into the yard.

Shoot 'em 'til they stay down.

(08-05-2011 06:32 PM)I45owl Wrote:  

(08-05-2011 05:49 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  There's no reason to shoot someone 9 times. Of course women can get away with anything.

I can think of one reason ... they were still moving after the 8th shot.

Yep...
Rule number one for my wife and daughter. Never pull a gun unless you intend to use it.
Rule number 2, empty the clip and reload... Call the police... remain "trained" on the intruder until they arrive

(08-07-2011 01:23 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(08-06-2011 11:24 PM)Smaug Wrote:  

(08-06-2011 11:21 PM)RobertN Wrote:  Render him harmless and call the cops.

Um, that's what she did.

I guess you could say he was rendered harmless by killing him. Of course, I wasn't thinkng in terrms of death, just incapacitated.

How much "capacity" would someone need to fire their own gun back, Robert? Did she KNOW he was dead? How did she know that? I mean, here we are once again... a law abiding citizen being attacked by a criminal... and make no mistake... at the time of his actions, HE is a criminal and SHE is law abiding. Exactly how should she have determined that he was incapacitated? Should she have asked him? Gotten him to sign a notarized affadavit?

I get that you may be anti-gun. Fine. No different from people who are anti-abortion but have to put up with its legalities anyway. The difference HERE is, this man was committing a crime at the time. You would give a law abiding citizen fewer rights than a criminal SIMPLY because you disagree with their right to protect themselves?

You've created this television based fantasy of being able to shoot once with "whatever" and completely incapacitate someone without doing actual bodily harm to them, while you calmly turn your back on them and go back to pruning your garden until the police arrive to mop up the blood and repair your broken window.

Roberta is pro criminal and anti-law abiding citizen. If there is a question, Roberta comes down, every time, on the side of the dead criminal.

I guess I'd ask him... if an abortion doctor were actually a pro-lifer in disguise and intentionally tried to kill or maim the pregnant woman, should the woman be allowed to use deadly force to stop him? Or should she just "lay back and enjoy it" /Clayton Williams

(08-08-2011 12:05 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Roberta is pro criminal and anti-law abiding citizen. If there is a question, Roberta comes down, every time, on the side of the dead criminal.

I think the case is more his absolute revulsion of agreeing with what could be construed as a conservative issue.

Good call, Stanley. He's not hardwired to even entertain the thought of agreeing with that which is opposite of his talking points. Damn the evidence, full speed ahead.

(08-08-2011 12:13 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  I guess I'd ask him... if an abortion doctor were actually a pro-lifer in disguise and intentionally tried to kill or maim the pregnant woman, should the woman be allowed to use deadly force to stop him? Or should she just "lay back and enjoy it" /Clayton Williams

There is no reason for all of this disagreement in this thread.

Just change the thread topic and be done with it.

Maybe the guy was confused and just happened to stumble into her house, her bedroom, and bathroom while she was taking a shower. Darn her for killing a confused and innocent man.

Fixed the topic so Roberta can agree with us all.