After touching your junk, TSA now wants to scan and harvest your DNA


(NaturalNews) As if it's not enough for the TSA to feel you up at the airport, now they're experimenting with rapid results DNA scanners that can scan and analyze your DNA using just a drop of saliva. Spit at the TSA agent who is molesting you, in other words, and they can use that saliva to scan your DNA and then store it in a government database.

Why would they want to do that? We can only imagine. Remember, it was Alex Jones who broke the story about hospitals secretly taking blood samples of babies and handing them over to the federal government for use in a national genetic database

After touching your junk, TSA now wants to scan and harvest your DNA

**** dat!

WTF??? What does DNA have to do with anything?

The story so important it needed to be linked twice...LOL

From the original article you will find:

"The agency notes that the field test will be in small scale, and there's not yet a timeline or decision on purchasing or deploying the technology"

Sorry, didn't see that bit of imporant information in the scare piece.

(03-01-2011 01:10 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  WTF??? What does DNA have to do with anything?

UK style DNA database.

(03-01-2011 03:23 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The story so important it needed to be linked twice...LOL

From the original article you will find:

"The agency notes that the field test will be in small scale, and there's not yet a timeline or decision on purchasing or deploying the technology"

Sorry, didn't see that bit of imporant information in the scare piece.

Even considering such a measure should cause a revolt. Buttttt the sheeple continue happily marching to the butcher, utterly oblivious.


It's also worth noting that DNA is only in the 99th percentile of accuracy due to the limited number of splits they perform. That sounds high ... but next time you go to a football game ... I have a mental exercise for you. Estimate the attendance. Now multiply attendance by even 0.1% and notice that you're among several dozen people who would match your DNA at a crime scene.

(03-01-2011 03:23 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The story so important it needed to be linked twice...LOL

From the original article you will find:

"The agency notes that the field test will be in small scale, and there's not yet a timeline or decision on purchasing or deploying the technology"

Sorry, didn't see that bit of imporant information in the scare piece.

Typical liberal attitude. Hey, no problem...it's in the future. Just worry about it when it happens. Just like we'll cut spending when we become completely insolvent.

(03-01-2011 03:23 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The story so important it needed to be linked twice...LOL

Pissy, f'ucking liberals. B!tch and moan when no link is provided, and I make you look it up.... then p!ss and moan if its linked more than once. F'ucktards, want you to read it to them next.

Dude relax...I was just teasing you. Man are you guys intense!

My only point is that life is too short to go ape **** with worry everytime this administration has a thought. Take it from me, I did a lot of it under shrub and it gets you nowhere.

(03-02-2011 08:15 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Dude relax...I was just teasing you. Man are you guys intense!

My only point is that life is too short to go ape **** with worry everytime this administration has a thought. Take it from me, I did a lot of it under shrub and it gets you nowhere.

Admitting that Bush drove you ape-sh!t with worry every time that admin. had a thought, only points to how uninformed you really are. This administration is far worse in every category, and in the worse thing Bush did Obama has continued even stepped it up. Lefters say nothing. 4 Trilion in 2 years, nada. on and on and on.

Could be worse.... you could live in Antarctica. Brrrr.

Once again, you are reading WAAAAAAAY to much into this.

(03-02-2011 11:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Once again, you are reading WAAAAAAAY to much into this.

Cop out. If Bush would have initiated and gave orders to do body scanning, enhanced pat down and the now plan to get DNA swabs, you lefter would have gone ape-sh!t. But since your guy is in office, you have no problem with it. Fact is your boy is ape-sh!t.

(03-02-2011 11:19 AM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(03-02-2011 11:00 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Once again, you are reading WAAAAAAAY to much into this.

Cop out. If Bush would have initiated and gave orders to do body scanning, enhanced pat down and the now plan to get DNA swabs, you lefter would have gone ape-sh!t. But since your guy is in office, you have no problem with it. Fact is your boy is ape-sh!t.

That's no lie. Patriot Act bad, DNA sampling good.

BS. I hate them both...mostly because they don't do a frickin' thing.

Besides, you are missing the point that there are no widespread planned random "DNA swabs" as you suggest.

(03-02-2011 12:18 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  BS. I hate them both...mostly because they don't do a frickin' thing.

Besides, you are missing the point that there are no widespread planned random "DNA swabs" as you suggest.

First line of the article. You totally and continually ignore what you don't want to acknowledge. They experimented with body scanners before they were implemented. Your view is one of a simpleton. SimpletonTom.

Quote:now they're experimenting with rapid results DNA scanners

What are you affraid of? You have nothing to hide, right?

(03-02-2011 02:01 PM)RobertN Wrote:  What are you affraid of? You have nothing to hide, right?

That's what they all say Robert. First they are not gay, then the next thing you know, they are coming out of the closet.

Which leads me to believe they are telling us they don't like the TSA, but secretly love having their junk touched.

I'm gay... and there are some REALLY hot TSA agents.... bahahahaha. I kid, I kid. I just use the xray.

(03-02-2011 01:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  

(03-02-2011 12:18 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  BS. I hate them both...mostly because they don't do a frickin' thing.

Besides, you are missing the point that there are no widespread planned random "DNA swabs" as you suggest.

First line of the article. You totally and continually ignore what you don't want to acknowledge. They experimented with body scanners before they were implemented. Your view is one of a simpleton. SimpletonTom.

Quote:now they're experimenting with rapid results DNA scanners

While it may end up being implemented on some grand scale, that does not change the fact that there is currently no widespread planned random "DNA swabs" as you seem to be suggesting.

You need to dig a little deeper to see past the partisan spin of the site you posted.

Try HERE where you will find:

"The agency notes that the field test will be in small scale, and there's not yet a timeline or decision on purchasing or deploying the technology"

Your rights need to be protected regardless of if you have anything to hide. Since you have no control of how this information will be distributed, you need to cut the nuts off at the source. You cannot live in an open society without limiting and putting in check any gov't attempt to expand and infringe.