DrTorch
Proved mach and GTS to be liars

Posts: 35,844
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:
 
|
NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2010...exu-1.html
Caution: graphic images.
If you do go there, be sure to read the comments. Lotta good stuff.
Quote:Among the many charming aspects of homosexual subculture is the practice of "dogging" — i.e., indulging in perverted sex acts with total strangers in public so as to disgust and horrify anyone who isn't profoundly sick. Like most things pernicious, this revolting activity is now officially protected by our liberal elite rulers. Once again England leads the way toward a glorious liberal utopia:
A new Hate Crime Guidance Manual has been handed to officers warning them that they must not ignore doggers being abused or verbally taunted in any way — as it can cause them to suffer from post traumatic stress. …
It states that doggers can be 'reluctant to report victimisation in outdoor sex environments' and says this is 'due to a misconception that the police will primarily be interested in why they were there, as opposed to tackling hate or prejudice motivated crime.
It goes on to say that hate crime can have a 'lasting impact on individual victims', adding that 'crime targeted at an individual's core identity also has the potential to undermine entire communities and damage community confidence in the police'.
For the record, I think this comment is well reasoned, even if I don't fully agree with it.
Quote:Libertarian here. No problem whatsoever with what people do in the privacy of their own homes. Public sex = problem. Problem on several levels: bad taste, lack of decency and respect for others, disruptive and destructive in-your-face nihilism, end-of-empire hedonism with obvious social consequences. Sure, to my eyes homosexual public sex is more distasteful than hetero public sex, but only by degree. Only to the most dogmatic, theory-bound libertarian is "nobody getting killed" the only criterion of acceptable social behavior.
The in-your-face-edness of modern militant homosexuality contains the seeds of its own demise. The backlash is going to be harsh, and unfair, and that is sad, because, as a libertarian, I do believe homosexuals should have the same rights as everyone else and be entitled to live their lives as they choose, in peace and quiet. That option is not going to be available to them if this keeps going. I won't be part of that backlash, but a lot of other people will be.
And don't miss the eulogy for common sense. Very good.
[EDIT: Put NSFW in title, that link has work fail in it]
|
|
| 10-29-2010 09:51 AM |
|
Rebel
Unregistered

|
RE: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
Quote:Libertarian here. No problem whatsoever with what people do in the privacy of their own homes. Public sex = problem. Problem on several levels: bad taste, lack of decency and respect for others, disruptive and destructive in-your-face nihilism, end-of-empire hedonism with obvious social consequences. Sure, to my eyes homosexual public sex is more distasteful than hetero public sex, but only by degree. Only to the most dogmatic, theory-bound libertarian is "nobody getting killed" the only criterion of acceptable social behavior.
The in-your-face-edness of modern militant homosexuality contains the seeds of its own demise. The backlash is going to be harsh, and unfair, and that is sad, because, as a libertarian, I do believe homosexuals should have the same rights as everyone else and be entitled to live their lives as they choose, in peace and quiet. That option is not going to be available to them if this keeps going. I won't be part of that backlash, but a lot of other people will be.
Same thing I said, only a lot more eloquent.
|
|
| 10-29-2010 10:12 AM |
|
SumOfAllFears
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls

Posts: 18,182
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
|
RE: NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
What of public indecency? A person should have a reasonable expectation to not being subjected to indecency in public.
|
|
| 10-29-2010 12:14 PM |
|
Lord Stanley
L'Étoile du Nord

Posts: 19,058
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 1000
I Root For: NIU
Location: Cold. So cold......
|
RE: NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
Quote:The in-your-face-edness of modern militant [INSERT PET CAUSE] contains the seeds of its own demise. The backlash is going to be harsh.
Words to live by.
|
|
| 10-29-2010 01:18 PM |
|
smn1256
I miss Tripster

Posts: 28,847
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 337
I Root For: Lower taxes
Location: North Mexico
|
RE: NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
Quote:It states that doggers can be 'reluctant to report victimisation in outdoor sex environments'
Outdoor sex environments???? WTF? Is a park bench next to a grade school such an environment? This **** is getting out of control.
|
|
| 10-29-2010 08:48 PM |
|
flyingswoosh
Hall of Famer

Posts: 15,863
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 69
I Root For:
Location:
|
RE: NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
remember that poster named Dogger? i finally get the meaning
|
|
| 10-30-2010 01:08 PM |
|
Motown Bronco
Hall of Famer

Posts: 21,185
Joined: Jul 2002
Reputation: 256
I Root For: WMU
Location: Metro Detroit
|
RE: NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
|
|
| 11-01-2010 07:20 AM |
|
Rebel
Unregistered

|
RE: NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
(10-30-2010 01:08 PM)flyingswoosh Wrote: remember that poster named Dogger? i finally get the meaning
Yeah, he's posting as Mach now.
|
|
| 11-01-2010 08:50 AM |
|