Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
Author Message
DrTorch Offline
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
*

Posts: 35,844
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:

CrappiesDonatorsBalance of Power Contest
Post: #1
NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2010...exu-1.html

Caution: graphic images.

If you do go there, be sure to read the comments. Lotta good stuff.

Quote:Among the many charming aspects of homosexual subculture is the practice of "dogging" — i.e., indulging in perverted sex acts with total strangers in public so as to disgust and horrify anyone who isn't profoundly sick. Like most things pernicious, this revolting activity is now officially protected by our liberal elite rulers. Once again England leads the way toward a glorious liberal utopia:

A new Hate Crime Guidance Manual has been handed to officers warning them that they must not ignore doggers being abused or verbally taunted in any way — as it can cause them to suffer from post traumatic stress. …
It states that doggers can be 'reluctant to report victimisation in outdoor sex environments' and says this is 'due to a misconception that the police will primarily be interested in why they were there, as opposed to tackling hate or prejudice motivated crime.
It goes on to say that hate crime can have a 'lasting impact on individual victims', adding that 'crime targeted at an individual's core identity also has the potential to undermine entire communities and damage community confidence in the police'.

For the record, I think this comment is well reasoned, even if I don't fully agree with it.

Quote:Libertarian here. No problem whatsoever with what people do in the privacy of their own homes. Public sex = problem. Problem on several levels: bad taste, lack of decency and respect for others, disruptive and destructive in-your-face nihilism, end-of-empire hedonism with obvious social consequences. Sure, to my eyes homosexual public sex is more distasteful than hetero public sex, but only by degree. Only to the most dogmatic, theory-bound libertarian is "nobody getting killed" the only criterion of acceptable social behavior.

The in-your-face-edness of modern militant homosexuality contains the seeds of its own demise. The backlash is going to be harsh, and unfair, and that is sad, because, as a libertarian, I do believe homosexuals should have the same rights as everyone else and be entitled to live their lives as they choose, in peace and quiet. That option is not going to be available to them if this keeps going. I won't be part of that backlash, but a lot of other people will be.

And don't miss the eulogy for common sense. Very good.

[EDIT: Put NSFW in title, that link has work fail in it]
(This post was last modified: 10-29-2010 10:27 AM by georgia_tech_swagger.)
10-29-2010 09:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Rebel
Unregistered

 
CrappiesNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #2
RE: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
Quote:Libertarian here. No problem whatsoever with what people do in the privacy of their own homes. Public sex = problem. Problem on several levels: bad taste, lack of decency and respect for others, disruptive and destructive in-your-face nihilism, end-of-empire hedonism with obvious social consequences. Sure, to my eyes homosexual public sex is more distasteful than hetero public sex, but only by degree. Only to the most dogmatic, theory-bound libertarian is "nobody getting killed" the only criterion of acceptable social behavior.

The in-your-face-edness of modern militant homosexuality contains the seeds of its own demise. The backlash is going to be harsh, and unfair, and that is sad, because, as a libertarian, I do believe homosexuals should have the same rights as everyone else and be entitled to live their lives as they choose, in peace and quiet. That option is not going to be available to them if this keeps going. I won't be part of that backlash, but a lot of other people will be.

Same thing I said, only a lot more eloquent.
10-29-2010 10:12 AM
Quote this message in a reply
SumOfAllFears Offline
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
*

Posts: 18,182
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
Post: #3
RE: NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
What of public indecency? A person should have a reasonable expectation to not being subjected to indecency in public.
10-29-2010 12:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Lord Stanley Offline
L'Étoile du Nord
*

Posts: 19,058
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 1000
I Root For: NIU
Location: Cold. So cold......
Post: #4
RE: NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
Quote:The in-your-face-edness of modern militant [INSERT PET CAUSE] contains the seeds of its own demise. The backlash is going to be harsh.

Words to live by.
10-29-2010 01:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


smn1256 Offline
I miss Tripster
*

Posts: 28,847
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 337
I Root For: Lower taxes
Location: North Mexico
Post: #5
RE: NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
Quote:It states that doggers can be 'reluctant to report victimisation in outdoor sex environments'

Outdoor sex environments???? WTF? Is a park bench next to a grade school such an environment? This **** is getting out of control.
10-29-2010 08:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
flyingswoosh Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 15,863
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 69
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #6
RE: NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
remember that poster named Dogger? i finally get the meaning
10-30-2010 01:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Motown Bronco Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 21,181
Joined: Jul 2002
Reputation: 256
I Root For: WMU
Location: Metro Detroit
Post: #7
RE: NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
Almost every 'real' story can be tied to an Onion article. :)

http://www.theonion.com/articles/gayprid...-gays,351/

(NSFW photos)
11-01-2010 07:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rebel
Unregistered

 
CrappiesNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #8
RE: NSFW: I, uh, don't even know how to title this
(10-30-2010 01:08 PM)flyingswoosh Wrote:  remember that poster named Dogger? i finally get the meaning

Yeah, he's posting as Mach now.
11-01-2010 08:50 AM
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.