(09-10-2009 11:13 PM)egrizzard Wrote:  This thread is hilarious.

Tech and their high-school offense

Aren't you the resident closet UGAg fan? 45-42.

At the last minute of the game, Clemson fails to get the ball to their best player and the fastest player in the country. 4 plays and he didn't even touch the ball. Poor.

(09-10-2009 11:42 PM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(09-10-2009 11:13 PM)egrizzard Wrote:  This thread is hilarious.

Tech and their high-school offense

Aren't you the resident closet UGAg fan? 45-42.

What's that saying about blind squirrels...?

(09-11-2009 12:21 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  What's that saying about blind squirrels...?

They win SEC titles once every 30 years? National Championships every 150?

(09-11-2009 12:47 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:21 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  What's that saying about blind squirrels...?

They win SEC titles once every 30 years? National Championships every 150?

I may have found the one pocket protector that isn't obsessed with the Dawgs, either that or your math is worse than it's supposed to be.

UGA has won two SEC championships this decade '02 and '05 and correct me if I'm wrong(you are supposed to be good at math right?) that is way less than 30 years.

Congrats on the first win in the series this decade but I wouldn't expect another after LSU exposed Paul Johnson in the Peach Bowl. Perhaps in another 8 years you can hire another coach with another gimmick offense and you can get your one win next decade...

(09-11-2009 12:57 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:47 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:21 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  What's that saying about blind squirrels...?

They win SEC titles once every 30 years? National Championships every 150?

I may have found the one pocket protector that isn't obsessed with the Dawgs, either that or your math is worse than it's supposed to be.

UGA has won two SEC championships this decade '02 and '05 and correct me if I'm wrong(you are supposed to be good at math right?) that is way less than 30 years.

Congrats on the first win in the series this decade but I wouldn't expect another after LSU exposed Paul Johnson in the Peach Bowl. Perhaps in another 8 years you can hire another coach with another gimmick offense and you can get your one win next decade...

Daaaaang. Kapp be bringin' it.

(09-11-2009 01:08 AM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:57 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:47 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:21 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  What's that saying about blind squirrels...?

They win SEC titles once every 30 years? National Championships every 150?

I may have found the one pocket protector that isn't obsessed with the Dawgs, either that or your math is worse than it's supposed to be.

UGA has won two SEC championships this decade '02 and '05 and correct me if I'm wrong(you are supposed to be good at math right?) that is way less than 30 years.

Congrats on the first win in the series this decade but I wouldn't expect another after LSU exposed Paul Johnson in the Peach Bowl. Perhaps in another 8 years you can hire another coach with another gimmick offense and you can get your one win next decade...

Daaaaang. Kapp be bringin' it.

Didn't mean to derail the thread, but I'm from Georgia and was raised in a family full of UGA grads. I still keep tabs on the Dawgs, but they're definitely my #2 team now. The one UGA game I'm virtually assured of watching every year is the UGA/GT game, it's always the Saturday following Thanksgiving which is the day of extended family celebration. Since I started at MT I think we've only had a home game that same Saturday one year, that's probably the only UGA/GT game that I haven't watched with my extended family in my life.

(09-11-2009 12:57 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  ...after LSU exposed Paul Johnson in the Peach Bowl.

Exposed? This offense has been around longer than I've been alive. If you don't know the answer to it, don't be a coach. It comes down to execution and preparation.

As for tonight's game, I was there. High endzone seats pretty much sucked, but I got to act like I was playing a video game watching the plays unfold.

GT wasn't really stopped on offense until the 3rd quarter. Which happened to be the same time the GT secondary stopped paying attention. Remove some stupid decisions by the safetys on 2-3 plays, and Clemson could easily have 8-14 less points.

How this relates to MT, I'm not too sure. We play the exact opposite offense as GT, and we played horribly against Clemson. I just hope that wasn't how we're going to play all year. I don't now what to expect from this season, no less, this coming game.

I saw a grossly incompetent Georgia Offense try to win at Stillwater last week. If Cox, et al don't improve drastically, UGA is not going to do too well this season.

If Georgia Tech plays well and keeps it together, I think that they have a real chance to beat UGA and do well in the ACC.

(09-11-2009 12:57 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:47 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:21 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  What's that saying about blind squirrels...?

They win SEC titles once every 30 years? National Championships every 150?

I may have found the one pocket protector that isn't obsessed with the Dawgs, either that or your math is worse than it's supposed to be.

UGA has won two SEC championships this decade '02 and '05 and correct me if I'm wrong(you are supposed to be good at math right?) that is way less than 30 years.

Congrats on the first win in the series this decade but I wouldn't expect another after LSU exposed Paul Johnson in the Peach Bowl. Perhaps in another 8 years you can hire another coach with another gimmick offense and you can get your one win next decade...

The gimmick offense that has Paul Johnson in the company of Barry Switzer for most wins in first 12 years coaching? How convenient of you to self-impose the beginning of UGA football in '02. Care to redo the math all-time, or was my 150 years not enough of a hint?

LSU didn't expose anything that wasn't already obvious. Stack the box and send the house and force GT to beat you in the air. You run the risk of being gouged for bomb after bomb in all man coverage with little to no safety support. But, our current QB cannot reliably punish defenses for that yet, if tonight's 1-12 with 2 INT performance before the final two drives weren't a sufficient indicator of that.

We'll see you and Ginger Ninja in Atlanta. Be sure to give Spraytan Richt some better "man up" speeches to deliver on the sideline when he's being outscored 26-0 in a single quarter by that high school offense. The last one didn't work so well.

(09-11-2009 01:41 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:57 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:47 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:21 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  What's that saying about blind squirrels...?

They win SEC titles once every 30 years? National Championships every 150?

I may have found the one pocket protector that isn't obsessed with the Dawgs, either that or your math is worse than it's supposed to be.

UGA has won two SEC championships this decade '02 and '05 and correct me if I'm wrong(you are supposed to be good at math right?) that is way less than 30 years.

Congrats on the first win in the series this decade but I wouldn't expect another after LSU exposed Paul Johnson in the Peach Bowl. Perhaps in another 8 years you can hire another coach with another gimmick offense and you can get your one win next decade...

The gimmick offense that has Paul Johnson in the company of Barry Switzer for most wins in first 12 years coaching? How convenient of you to self-impose the beginning of UGA football in '02. Care to redo the math all-time, or was my 150 years not enough of a hint?

LSU didn't expose anything that wasn't already obvious. Stack the box and send the house and force GT to beat you in the air. You run the risk of being gouged for bomb after bomb in all man coverage with little to no safety support. But, our current QB cannot reliably punish defenses for that yet, if tonight's 1-12 with 2 INT performance before the final two drives weren't a sufficient indicator of that.

We'll see you and Ginger Ninja in Atlanta. Be sure to give Spraytan Richt some better "man up" speeches to deliver on the sideline when he's being outscored 26-0 in a single quarter by that high school offense. The last one didn't work so well.

Well it was a game to two halves but I will say this GT never quit and got a big play when they needed and controlled the game well that last 3:00 minutes. Clemson did not get the ball in the hands of they play maker the last possession. Good win for tech as they have a very hard schedule the next few weeks.

(09-11-2009 01:41 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:57 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:47 AM)georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:  

(09-11-2009 12:21 AM)MTPiKapp Wrote:  What's that saying about blind squirrels...?

They win SEC titles once every 30 years? National Championships every 150?

I may have found the one pocket protector that isn't obsessed with the Dawgs, either that or your math is worse than it's supposed to be.

UGA has won two SEC championships this decade '02 and '05 and correct me if I'm wrong(you are supposed to be good at math right?) that is way less than 30 years.

Congrats on the first win in the series this decade but I wouldn't expect another after LSU exposed Paul Johnson in the Peach Bowl. Perhaps in another 8 years you can hire another coach with another gimmick offense and you can get your one win next decade...

The gimmick offense that has Paul Johnson in the company of Barry Switzer for most wins in first 12 years coaching? How convenient of you to self-impose the beginning of UGA football in '02. Care to redo the math all-time, or was my 150 years not enough of a hint?

LSU didn't expose anything that wasn't already obvious. Stack the box and send the house and force GT to beat you in the air. You run the risk of being gouged for bomb after bomb in all man coverage with little to no safety support. But, our current QB cannot reliably punish defenses for that yet, if tonight's 1-12 with 2 INT performance before the final two drives weren't a sufficient indicator of that.

We'll see you and Ginger Ninja in Atlanta. Be sure to give Spraytan Richt some better "man up" speeches to deliver on the sideline when he's being outscored 26-0 in a single quarter by that high school offense. The last one didn't work so well.

I have seen nothing from GT that worries me. You may be right about UGA if they don't improve, but in general, GT is nowhere near the position to think they scare any UGA fans.

As far as starting in '02, I actually started in '01, but whatever...

All time wins UGA 724 GT 665

Head to head 59-39-5 in Georgia's favor

Georgia's record against ACC 152-92-18

Georgia Tech's record vs. SEC 200-207-24

Heisman Trophy winners UGA 2 GT 0

And your saving grace, Georgia Tech has more national championships and won one more recently, but it's been nearly two decades since Georgia Tech's national championship as opposed to nearly three since Georgia's. At that point, does it really matter? Sure, it does a little, but if you haven't won a national title in over 1 decade it's not exactly something you should be bragging about. I don't go around wearing a 1980 National Championship shirt, do you walk around with your 1990 National Championship shirt? At this point none of UGA's current traditional undergrad population was alive for their last national championship and it's only a few years from it being the same case at Georgia Tech. So while you have the one thing to hang your hat on, overall I'd say history is on the Dawg's side.

BCS fans arguing on our little non-aq board makes me all frisky...