(03-02-2009 12:02 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote: What these dimwits should be asking is.....Is developing alternative renewable energy is a good idea?..Is having clean air to breathe a good idea?...Is reducing our dependency on foreign oil a good idea?
These are the things the we ALL agree are probably good things to achieve....and....They also accomplish the same goals as the GW zombies want to achieve regardless of the science.
Yes, yes, and yes.
Which is why I abhor the resources wasted on Global Warming. It's a distraction, meaning time and money being lost. It also undermines the use of logic and rigor in science. If some "expert" is sure about something, he can cheat on his science b/c it's for the good of all. Gee, we don't have historical examples of that going awry, do we?
Where's the attention given to PG&E* signing up to use solar thermal energy, at a cost competitive rate? Why is all you see photovoltaics?
*
edit actually the most recent is SoCal Edison. PG&E signed up a couple of years ago.
You want C sequestering? Maybe it involves gene splicing kudzu w/ pines or oaks. Or maybe it's algae based oil. I don't know for sure, but I don't hear much about this issue if it's so friggin important.
Where are other energy strategies being quantified and presented? This is science, no sociology...hard numbers exist upon which to make policy decisons.
I went to a gas station last week and they were using LEDs for overhead lighting. If they can afford it, why are we told homes and businesses can't? Where are LED lighting? Instead we get CFLs, which are a huge scam, and every bubblehead local TV personality espousing their benefits. We also have HS students believing they understand the universe b/c their lackwit teacher relayed the most current fable.
What's up w/ all this smoke and mirrors?