USA Today/Gallup Poll
38% - Criminal Investigation
24% - Independent Panel
-----------------------
62% - Total for Investigation

34%- Neither
3% - No Opinion
---------------------
37% - Total against/no opinion

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/...poll_N.htm

"Why can't we get back the bidness of running the gubment?"

Ridiculous waste of time and money if they do.

(02-12-2009 02:50 PM)mlb Wrote:  Ridiculous waste of time and money if they do.

yeah, but few in favor of the investigation pay taxes... so

I wonder how many of those non-taxpaying angered citizens lost their jobs in the last 8 years? I'm not saying all did. But I'd bet a good percentage of 'em do...

Frankly, whether or not BU$H was a criminal or just an @sshole is of little interest to me. It's the past. Any investigation will only cost money, and settle nothing...

Put me solidly in the YES column. The more time and energy that the power hungry socialists running our government chase this ....The less time they have to do me harm.

Let history judge Bush, NOTHING will be accomplished by this BS investigation but a report. Liberal Democrats the FREAKING money and spend it on Condoms like you were going to do with the Stimulus package.

(02-12-2009 07:00 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  Let history judge Bush, NOTHING will be accomplished by this BS investigation but a report. Liberal Democrats the FREAKING money and spend it on Condoms like you were going to do with the Stimulus package.

I bet the Palin family needs more education on how to use condoms.

(02-12-2009 07:00 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  Let history judge Bush, NOTHING will be accomplished by this BS investigation but a report.

+1 and a lot more.

(02-12-2009 06:35 PM)Fo Shizzle Wrote:  Put me solidly in the YES column. The more time and energy that the power hungry socialists running our government chase this ....The less time they have to do me harm.

Agree, this is probably the least damaging thing that this congress could spend its time doing.

(02-12-2009 08:17 PM)RockyMtnRamfan Wrote:  

(02-12-2009 07:00 PM)THE NC Herd Fan Wrote:  Let history judge Bush, NOTHING will be accomplished by this BS investigation but a report. Liberal Democrats the FREAKING money and spend it on Condoms like you were going to do with the Stimulus package.

I bet the Palin family needs more education on how to use condoms.

Nah. Abstinence only is the best policy. Besides, sex just doesn't feel as good if you have a condom on so it makes no sense to use one. Who really cares about the outcome(right Trippy?).

(02-13-2009 04:03 AM)RobertN Wrote:  Nah. Abstinence only is the best policy. Besides, sex just doesn't feel as good if you have a condom on so it makes no sense to use one. Who really cares about the outcome(right Trippy?).

Why do you keep tossing barbs at me on this one Robert ??

My children were born long after my wife and I were married and in turn, my Children were well into their marriages before they had their first child.

If you Robert, are so weak minded that you need a Rubber Shield to not stop the sex, but to stop the sperm from knocking up your skank, then hey son, purchase stock in Prophylactic Futures.

I guess I am one of the "Few", if I apply your standard to me, "who put sex somewhere far down on the unimportant for a meaningful date list".

Seems you and your buds are obsessed with Sex, not me homie ... I can take it or leave it .... I would rather spend time with my partner versus just screwing her and heading out the door.

But I really do understand the need for thicker, stronger rubbers Robbie ..... YOU !!!!!

If you just can't SAY NO, then use the Bill Clinton model for Sex .... stick it in every hole but the one that makes it Sex .... and IS is NOT IS, unless I say IS is IS !!!!!!

.

I have never read the word "skank" on this board before.

The investigation is only into torture UNDER the administration, with I suppose SOME knowledge by Bush himself... so in other words, a TOTAL waste of time. Some "relatively" low level Officer would go down (if it happened) and write a book... and everyone above would have something to hide behind... think Ollie North

(02-13-2009 09:25 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  I have never read the word "skank" on this board before.

.

(02-13-2009 09:25 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  I have never read the word "skank" on this board before.

You've obviously never visited the Babe of the Day board.