Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
Author Message
WoodlandsOwl Offline
Up in the Woods
*

Posts: 11,813
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 115
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #1
Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
Perhaps add Hillary's name to the list too.. as the NY Times today said she engaged in a "pay for play" deal. 05-nono

Richardson to withdraw as Commerce Secretary

New Mexico governor cites pending investigation of business dealings

New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, tapped in December by President-elect Barack Obama to serve as secretary of Commerce, has withdrawn his name for the position, citing a pending investigation into a company that has done business with his state.

"Let me say unequivocally that I and my Administration have acted properly in all matters and that this investigation will bear out that fact," he said Sunday in a report by NBC News' Andrea Mitchell. "But I have concluded that the ongoing investigation also would have forced an untenable delay in the confirmation process."

A federal grand jury is investigating how a California company that contributed to Richardson's political activities won a lucrative New Mexico state contract.

A person familiar with the proceedings has told The Associated Press that the grand jury is looking into possible "pay-to-play" dealings between CDR Financial Products and someone in a position to push the contract through with the state of New Mexico.

Richardson said he plans to continue in his role as governor. "I appreciate the confidence President-elect Obama has shown in me, and value our friendship and working partnership. I told him that I am eager to serve in the future in any way he deems useful. And like all Americans, I pray for his success and the success of our beloved country."

Obama said Sunday he accepted Richardson's decision to withdraw with 'deep regret.'

"Governor Richardson is an outstanding public servant and would have brought to the job of Commerce Secretary and our economic team great insights accumulated through an extraordinary career in federal and state office," Obama said.

Richardson, 61, was United Nations ambassador and energy secretary during the Clinton administration, and he is in his second term as New Mexico's governor. He also served seven terms in the House of Representatives.

If he had been confirmed by the Senate as secretary of Commerce, he would have taken over a sprawling department that oversees the National Weather Service, the Census Bureau, economic development programs and more.

One of the nation's most prominent Hispanic politicians, Richardson had pledged at the time of his nomination — in English and Spanish — to work to renew the economy.

Obama on Sunday gave no indication whom he might name to replace Richardson as the nominee but said "we must move quickly to fill the void left by Governor Richardson's decision."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28493919/
01-04-2009 02:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


WoodlandsOwl Offline
Up in the Woods
*

Posts: 11,813
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 115
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #2
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
But wait, there's more!! to quote Billy Mays. This reeks of "pay for play"

A Donor’s Gift Soon Followed Clinton’s Help

WASHINGTON — An upstate New York developer donated $100,000 to former President Bill Clinton’s foundation in November 2004, around the same time that Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton helped secure millions of dollars in federal assistance for the businessman’s mall project.

Mrs. Clinton helped enact legislation allowing the developer, Robert J. Congel, to use tax-exempt bonds to help finance the construction of the Destiny USA entertainment and shopping complex, an expansion of the Carousel Center in Syracuse.

Mrs. Clinton also helped secure a provision in a highway bill that set aside $5 million for Destiny USA roadway construction.

The bill with the tax-free bonds provision became law in October 2004, weeks before the donation, and the highway bill with the set-aside became law in August 2005, about nine months after the donation.

Mr. Congel and Philippe Reines, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton, both said there was no connection between his donation and her legislative work on his project’s behalf. Mr. Reines said Mrs. Clinton supported the expansion of Carousel mall “purely as part of her unwavering commitment to improving upstate New York’s struggling economy, and nothing more.”

Mr. Clinton set up his foundation as he was leaving the White House and as his wife was transforming herself from first lady to United States senator from New York. The William J. Clinton Foundation finances Mr. Clinton’s presidential library in Little Rock, Ark., as well as programs that work on AIDS, poverty, climate change and other causes worldwide.

Donations to charities favored by lawmakers have been a recent ethics flashpoint in Congress, including the controversy over Representative Charles B. Rangel’s fund-raising from businesses with interests before the House Ways and Means Committee, which he leads, for a center named after him at the City College of New York. In 2007, Congress enacted a law requiring companies and their lobbyists to disclose donations to charities associated with lawmakers.

But there is no law requiring former presidents to disclose money they collect for their foundations.

Mr. Clinton’s foundation last month revealed the identity of its donors as part of an agreement with President-elect Barack Obama, who selected Mrs. Clinton as his nominee for secretary of state.

Most of the attention on the disclosure list has focused on millions of dollars donated by foreign tycoons and Middle Eastern governments, like Saudi Arabia, which have an interest in the United States foreign policy that Mrs. Clinton would direct as the nation’s chief diplomat.

But lower on the list was Mr. Congel’s name, one of about 180 people who had donated $50,000 to $100,000. A Destiny USA spokesman said Mr. Congel made a $100,000 donation in November 2004.

“There was no connection with Bill Clinton and the ‘green bonds’ and the contribution,” Mr. Congel said in an interview. “None at all.”

Mr. Congel had been a prime force behind Congress’s passage of tax-exempt “green bonds,” a program to lower the financing costs of some $2 billion in environmentally friendly projects by exempting lenders from paying federal taxes on their income from the private bonds. By some estimates, the program could cost the Treasury about $200 million.

The way the legislation was written, Mr. Congel’s Syracuse development, which he agreed to build and run in a way that promotes renewable energy and recycling, was one of just a handful of projects that would qualify.

His contribution is the only known situation so far in which an American donor gave a large sum to Mr. Clinton’s foundation while benefiting from his wife’s official actions. Mr. Reines said that Mrs. Clinton did not solicit the donation from Mr. Congel or discuss it with him or anyone on his behalf, and that she was unaware of its timing and size until last month.

Mrs. Clinton, who as a Senate candidate in 2000 supported other tax breaks for a Carousel mall expansion to create jobs, did not work alone in getting the subsidies through Congress. The measures had other supporters in the New York delegation, including Senator Charles E. Schumer, a Democrat, and James T. Walsh, Syracuse’s Republican representative at the time.

And the “green bonds” were backed by lawmakers from three other states with projects that would qualify for it.

Still, Mrs. Clinton threw her weight behind the legislation. In April 2006, she took partial credit for enacting the program in an interview with The Post-Standard of Syracuse.

“I’ve been a big supporter of Destiny,” Mrs. Clinton told the newspaper. “I worked successfully to get the green bonds passed. I think it would be a big shot in the arm. It would be a destination site for the area.”

And in July 2005, when the highway bill cleared the Senate, Mrs. Clinton’s office put out a news release announcing the “$5 million that Senators Schumer and Clinton secured” for Destiny-related “design, research, construction and improvements.”

Although Mr. Congel has sometimes given money to Democrats, he is a major Republican campaign fund-raiser. In 2004, he was a “Bush Ranger,” gathering more than $200,000 in bundled contributions for the Bush-Cheney re-election effort.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/washin...ml?_r=1&hp
(This post was last modified: 01-04-2009 02:15 PM by WoodlandsOwl.)
01-04-2009 02:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Paul M Offline
American-American
*

Posts: 21,196
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 649
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
Post: #3
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
Baracks past, present, and future consists of corrupt people. Some change.
01-04-2009 02:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
firmbizzle Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 20,447
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 442
I Root For: UF, UCF
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
I just got my Barack/JFK commerative silver dollar in the mail. Don't be the last one to get on the bandwagon. The Change we need is here!

05-stirthepot
01-04-2009 05:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
smn1256 Offline
I miss Tripster
*

Posts: 28,878
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 337
I Root For: Lower taxes
Location: North Mexico
Post: #5
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
Gotta wonder if Richardson voluntarily stepped aside or was told to.
01-04-2009 05:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


mlb Offline
O' Great One
*

Posts: 20,338
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 542
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:

Donators
Post: #6
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
All of this coming from WMD Owl, a Bush/Cheney supporter. I wonder how Halliburton got their no-bid deals?

Goes both ways.
01-04-2009 05:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Paul M Offline
American-American
*

Posts: 21,196
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 649
I Root For: OU
Location: Next to Boomer
Post: #7
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
Halliburton gets a lot of work simply because there is no one else big enough to do the job.
01-04-2009 05:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cb4029 Offline
The spoon that stirs the pot.
*

Posts: 18,793
Joined: Jun 2007
Reputation: 353
I Root For: Deez Nuts
Location: B'ham

Donators
Post: #8
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
(01-04-2009 05:20 PM)mlb Wrote:  All of this coming from WMD Owl, a Bush/Cheney supporter. I wonder how Halliburton got their no-bid deals?

Goes both ways.

03-lmfao @ any Bush/Cheney supporters that criticize others. It's pure comedy. 05-stirthepot
01-04-2009 05:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
mlb Offline
O' Great One
*

Posts: 20,338
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 542
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:

Donators
Post: #9
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
(01-04-2009 05:26 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Halliburton gets a lot of work simply because there is no one else big enough to do the job.

I don't believe that for a second. Either Halliburton has those people already on their payroll (waste of money) or any company can recruit just as they did get the ball rolling. Yes, there is some sort of statement to be made of past work done by the company, but by most all accounts Halliburton wasted all kinds of time and money themselves.

I really don't want to sound like an anti-bush guy, because I'm not (I think he did good and bad things), but ripping in Hilary saying she was given a donation to steer a contract is no different than saying Bush/Cheney was given a donation in order to steer contracts to Halliburton.
01-04-2009 05:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


WoodlandsOwl Offline
Up in the Woods
*

Posts: 11,813
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 115
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #10
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
(01-04-2009 05:44 PM)mlb Wrote:  
(01-04-2009 05:26 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Halliburton gets a lot of work simply because there is no one else big enough to do the job.

I don't believe that for a second. Either Halliburton has those people already on their payroll (waste of money) or any company can recruit just as they did get the ball rolling. Yes, there is some sort of statement to be made of past work done by the company, but by most all accounts Halliburton wasted all kinds of time and money themselves.

I really don't want to sound like an anti-bush guy, because I'm not (I think he did good and bad things), but ripping in Hilary saying she was given a donation to steer a contract is no different than saying Bush/Cheney was given a donation in order to steer contracts to Halliburton.

Haliburton's relationship with Dick Cheney and the Administration has been examined with a fine tooth colonoscope.

Yes, Cheney was Haliburton's former President. And has its been pointed out here, Haliburton/KBR was one of the few that could do the job.

Haliburton has been through the ringer since 2003 on this, Congress has investigated and NOBODY HAS BEEN INDICTED.

No bid contracts have their place. I don't see anyone screaming about the no bid contract that Shaw Industries got for Katrina.

I was just bringing it up that Hillary has ANOTHER "Play for Pay" incident... and add this to the list of her involvement in "Presidential Pardons for Pay" etc.

If someone put pressure on Richardson to quit for "pay to play" then Hillary deserves the same examination.
01-04-2009 07:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SumOfAllFears Offline
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
*

Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
Post: #11
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
More corrupt campaigning tactics, it's only a matter of time before it gets to O'messiahBama.
01-04-2009 08:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,843
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3211
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #12
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
(01-04-2009 05:44 PM)mlb Wrote:  
(01-04-2009 05:26 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Halliburton gets a lot of work simply because there is no one else big enough to do the job.
I don't believe that for a second. Either Halliburton has those people already on their payroll (waste of money) or any company can recruit just as they did get the ball rolling. Yes, there is some sort of statement to be made of past work done by the company, but by most all accounts Halliburton wasted all kinds of time and money themselves.
I really don't want to sound like an anti-bush guy, because I'm not (I think he did good and bad things), but ripping in Hilary saying she was given a donation to steer a contract is no different than saying Bush/Cheney was given a donation in order to steer contracts to Halliburton.

Realistically, the companies that could have done the job would probably include Halliburton/KBR (which used to be the demorats' favored company in the days of LBJ and George Brown), Bechtel (which used to be the republicans' favored company in the days of Schultz and Weinberger), Fluor, and Schlumberger. This really is not something that anybody can just hire folks and ramp up for; the field of those who have the project management skill sets to do it is pretty small, but it is not linited to just Halliburton.

I'm told from what should be a good source that a major reason Halliburton brought in Cheney was to build a republican connection. I guess that worked out okay for them.

Schlumberger was clearly out of the running because they're French, but I think there's one situation where it would have made a lot of sense to use them. The Kurds need their own country, and they have enough oil to make it work. The problem is that Turkey doesn't want an independent Kurd state. What Turkey does want in the worst way is EU membership. Tell France to pressure Turkey on the Kurd deal in exchange for moving their EU application forward, and the carrot is that Schlumberger gets the contract to rebuild Kurdistan. I think that would have worked, but we were so determined to go it alone that we would never have tried it.

Of course, maybe our determination to go it alone was driven in part by the Halliburton connection. Not sayin', just wonderin'.

I think I'd have found a way to get all of them involved. Maybe give overall project management to one, and give the other three one each of the Kurd area (Schlumberger for reasons above), the Sunni area, and the Shia area.
01-04-2009 08:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Tripster Offline
Most Dangerous Man on a Keyboard
*

Posts: 3,140
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 16
I Root For: The Best Only
Location: Where the Action is
Post: #13
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
.

Dig it ......

Halliburton was the only Company of its abilities, scope, and size at the time needed, who could do the job.

Why waste 6 months bidding something out, when you needed a company doing it 'Yesterday', and the company is right there and able to deploy on notice ???

Why ???

And as far as the Clinton's go .... they will always be corrupt and get ahead at all expense people .... their entire lives have been lived with people catering to them like they are Royalty and that is all they know from.

To be honest, Richardson surprised me .... but then that is My Fault, not his ... he is a Politician and every one of them are Corrupt Liars and Thieves ... why I thought him to be 'Better than the others', is my momentary lapse of reason.

.
(This post was last modified: 01-05-2009 02:29 PM by Tripster.)
01-04-2009 08:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Grammar-Nazi Offline
Grammar police
*

Posts: 14,426
Joined: Dec 2004
Reputation: 129
I Root For: UAB
Location: Maryville, Mo.

Folding@NCAAbbs
Post: #14
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
You show me a politician who hasn't done something illegal, unethical or immoral in his or her career, and I'll show you a politician who has never been elected to public office.

All politicians are corrupt. It's the very definition of politician.
01-05-2009 11:42 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Rebel
Unregistered

 
CrappiesNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #15
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
(01-04-2009 05:20 PM)mlb Wrote:  All of this coming from WMD Owl, a Bush/Cheney supporter. I wonder how Halliburton got their no-bid deals?

Goes both ways.

Maybe they were advised by Clinton, the first one to give them a no-bid contract.
01-05-2009 01:03 PM
Quote this message in a reply
Artifice Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,064
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 168
I Root For: Beer
Location:
Post: #16
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
(01-04-2009 07:30 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  Haliburton has been through the ringer since 2003 on this, Congress has investigated and NOBODY HAS BEEN INDICTED.

This means literally nothing. The absence of this happening to date does not preclude it from happening in the future, and let's not even start with the disgusting coverups and evidence destruction of the Shrub adminsitration, or all of the rampant mismangement of the entire Iraq Boondoggle, or the KBR/Halliburton overbillings, or....
(This post was last modified: 01-05-2009 04:55 PM by Artifice.)
01-05-2009 04:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WoodlandsOwl Offline
Up in the Woods
*

Posts: 11,813
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 115
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location:

New Orleans Bowl
Post: #17
RE: Richardson withdraws from Sec of Commerce nomination.
(01-05-2009 04:55 PM)Artifice Wrote:  
(01-04-2009 07:30 PM)WMD Owl Wrote:  Haliburton has been through the ringer since 2003 on this, Congress has investigated and NOBODY HAS BEEN INDICTED.

This means literally nothing. The absence of this happening to date does not preclude it from happening in the future, and let's not even start with the disgusting coverups and evidence destruction of the Shrub adminsitration, or all of the rampant mismangement of the entire Iraq Boondoggle, or the KBR/Halliburton overbillings, or....

Good luck on that because you have less than 14 months before the Statute of Limitations runs out. I don't see any US Attorney in Texas conducting a credible investigation and getting indictments in that period of time, especially since Congress has already looked and found nothing criminal, as no referrals were made.
01-05-2009 05:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.