The unofficial online home for fans of the UAB Blazers. Part of Collegiate Sports Nation (CSN).

Morte Wrote:

blazerfan13 Wrote:There is quite a laundry list of players who won't be playing that everyone on here is talking about in these threads. Sorry to break the news.

No offense, but I question where you get your information.

I've never been able to decide whether he pulls it out of the air or out of his arse.

I'll go with my pick from last year, Swayze Waters, punter.

Look at the Memphis game. If the kitties hadn't had abysmal field position the whole game, they'd have beat us a lot worse.

blazerfan13 Wrote:Basically, the question should be, what is not a weakness, because just about every position other than quarterback, kicker, and secondary is a blatant weakness. One thing everyone is leaving out is the people who will not be eligible next year because of grades. There is quite a laundry list of players who won't be playing that everyone on here is talking about in these threads. Sorry to break the news.

I find that odd considering that Mackin said our APR for the fall was above 925, and that Spring was on course for the same. You can't score a 925 and have a bunch of players be ineligible.

Come now. It was posted on an internet message board. Therefore it must be true.

Our best player will be - UAB Blazers. We are a team and should not be pointing out individuality. Hence, CNC's reason for no names on the jerseys .

APR is based on the previous year. thats why we lost 9, going back to last year's turnover. Won't say any names, but a significant OL, DL, and RB. You can knock me all you want but when you find out you heard it here first.

Again, I question where you get your information.

blazerfan13 Wrote:APR is based on the previous year. thats why we lost 9, going back to last year's turnover. Won't say any names, but a significant OL, DL, and RB. You can knock me all you want but when you find out you heard it here first.

The failing APR score we got was based on last year. The 925 score that Mackin mentioned in the article was for the Fall 2007 semester and the Spring 08 semester was on course to be above 925 as well. I don't have any inside information, that was in the Bham news.

But I will say, we didn't have any significant RBs last year, so that shouldn't really matter!

Lawrence Kinnard

BlazerPhil Wrote:Lawrence Kinnard

AJ (Best up and coming player)

>shrug< Actually, he's fairly safe as long as he stays general. It's a pretty good bet that a player or two will have some kind of disciplinary or academic problem, then he can point at them as day "See! I was right!".

How did Kinnard's first season at Missouri turn out?

what the H#LL was the original intent of this thread?

swayze waters