blah Wrote:Says the guy that is promoting a money bomb promotion to gain interest in his candidate....

If he really is the best candidate, he shouldn't need gimmicks to prove it. Hey, why throw another bash on Huckabee? He just keeps rolling without the gimmicks.

It's a shame the major media in this country is so pathetic that that is what it takes to get some press. The coverage of Ron Paul in the BBC is better than 90% of the US mainstream media. Pathetic.

As for Huckabee -- great if you're a fan of tax hikes, theocracy-lite, and paroling convicted rapists.

georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:

blah Wrote:Says the guy that is promoting a money bomb promotion to gain interest in his candidate....

If he really is the best candidate, he shouldn't need gimmicks to prove it. Hey, why throw another bash on Huckabee? He just keeps rolling without the gimmicks.

It's a shame the major media in this country is so pathetic that that is what it takes to get some press. The coverage of Ron Paul in the BBC is better than 90% of the US mainstream media. Pathetic.

As for Huckabee -- great if you're a fan of tax hikes, theocracy-lite, and paroling convicted rapists.

Right on cue...

The funniest thing about Paul is that his guy is bragging about getting a whole 11% of the vote, when Huckabee, a guy with 1/10 of the money shot by him like a rocket in Iowa and SC.

georgia_tech_swagger Wrote:The most recent poll in SC is 11%. You got one more recent? Pull 'er out and show me.

CBS news has him at 3%. The previous Rasmussen poll has him at 5%. Both are more recent than your CNN poll.

Just FYI.

paul's problem in SC is you have to be a registered Republican to vote in it, unlike some states which let you pick. So all his Larouchian/Fringe support by non-republicans can't vote in it.