2004 Picks

1: Boise State
2: Fresno State
3: Hawaii
4: Tulsa
5: Nevada
6: Rice
7: Louisiana Tech
8: San Jose State
9: Texas at El Paso
10: Southern Methodist

2004 Picks

1: Boise State
2: Tulsa
3: Hawaii
4: Fresno
5: Nevada
6: Rice
7: Texas at El Paso
8: LaTech
9: Southern Methodist
10: San Jose State

2004 Picks

1: Fresno
2: Hawaii
3: Boise State
4: Rice
5: LaTech
6: Tulsa
7: Nevada
8: Texas at El Paso
9: San Jose State
10: Southern Methodist

1: Boise State
2: Fresno State
3: Tulsa
4: Hawaii
5: Rice
6: UTEP
7: Louisana Tech
8: SMU
9: Nevada
10: San Jose State

how soon they forget! If nevada finishes in 6th or worse I will streak down virginia street on newyearseve!
We are in the top two or three if not winning the whole thing!

2004 Picks

1: Fresno State
2: Boise State
3: Nevada
4: Tulsa
5: Hawaii
6: Rice
7: Louisiana Tech
8: San Jose State
9: Southern Methodist
10:Texas at El Paso

And for the hell of it.....

2004 Sun Belt

1. New Mexico State
2. North Texas
3. Idaho
4. Troy
5. Utah State
6. Louisiana
7. Arkansas State
8. ULM
9. MTSU

broncobob Wrote:2004 Picks

1: Boise State
2: Tulsa
3: Hawaii
4: Fresno
5: Nevada
6: Rice
7: Texas at El Paso
8: LaTech
9: Southern Methodist
10: San Jose State

Tulsa huh?

here are my picks


1. Fresno State.

2. Hawaii

3. Boise

4. Nevada

5. Tulsa

6. La Tech

7. Rice

8. San Jose State

9. El Paso

10. SMU


thats the WAC for next year. i think fresno looks like the only top 25 team in the conf.

that's it eh? There are more than likely 2 top 25 teams in the WAC this next year but only the conference champ ends up there.

Fresno and Hawaii both come to Boise and that's an 'L'. So if Boise loses one in conference, they win the tiebreaker with the Dogs and Warriors. Smart money should be on Boise to repeat, but there's not much smart money out there as the 'experts' pick as you do. We'll see.

If nevada finishes in 6th or worse I will streak down virginia street on newyearseve!

Please give the rest of us fair warning of the time.

SunBelt eh...

2004 Sun Belt

1. Troy
2. North Texas
3. New Mexico State
4. Utah State
5. Idaho
6. Louisiana
7. Arkansas State
8. MTSU
9. ULM

SoCalValleyDog Wrote:SunBelt eh...

2004 Sun Belt

1. Troy
2. North Texas
3. New Mexico State
4. Utah State
5. Idaho
6. Louisiana
7. Arkansas State
8. MTSU
9. ULM

<span style='font-family:Times'><span style='font-size:12pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:blue'>Hold on! Why are you even worried about how the Sun Belt will finish and why are you posting this on a WAC messageboard, SoCalValleyDog? And worse, why are you responding to a David Krysakowski thread?

I know you want nothing but bad things for both Middle Tennessee and Louisiana-Monroe because of our very vehement and vocal stand against the existence of Louisiana Tech in the Sun Belt.

Good luck in the WAC. Hope you can represent southeastern collegiate football very well in the WAC.

But this I will promise you. The last place team in the Sun Belt this year will be one of the three teams leaving for the WAC!! Book it, buddy! It won't be ULM like you want!</span></span></span>

LMAO :laugh:

This guy always gets so worked up...

DUDE!!! take yur blood pressure pills QUICK!!!

BlueRaiderPride Wrote:

SoCalValleyDog Wrote:SunBelt eh...

2004 Sun Belt

1. Troy
2. North Texas
3. New Mexico State
4. Utah State
5. Idaho
6. Louisiana
7. Arkansas State
8. MTSU
9. ULM

<span style='font-family:Times'><span style='font-size:12pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:blue'>Hold on! Why are you even worried about how the Sun Belt will finish and why are you posting this on a WAC messageboard, SoCalValleyDog? And worse, why are you responding to a David Krysakowski thread?

I know you want nothing but bad things for both Middle Tennessee and Louisiana-Monroe because of our very vehement and vocal stand against the existence of Louisiana Tech in the Sun Belt.

Good luck in the WAC. Hope you can represent southeastern collegiate football very well in the WAC.

But this I will promise you. The last place team in the Sun Belt this year will be one of the three teams leaving for the WAC!! Book it, buddy! It won't be ULM like you want!</span></span></span>

I am pretty sure that none of the Sun Belt teams headed for the WAC will finish last in the SBC.
Unless MSTU and Monroe improved drastically!!!!

broncobob Wrote:

BlueRaiderPride Wrote:

SoCalValleyDog Wrote:SunBelt eh...

2004 Sun Belt

1. Troy
2. North Texas
3. New Mexico State
4. Utah State
5. Idaho
6. Louisiana
7. Arkansas State
8. MTSU
9. ULM

<span style='font-family:Times'><span style='font-size:12pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:blue'>Hold on! Why are you even worried about how the Sun Belt will finish and why are you posting this on a WAC messageboard, SoCalValleyDog? And worse, why are you responding to a David Krysakowski thread?

I know you want nothing but bad things for both Middle Tennessee and Louisiana-Monroe because of our very vehement and vocal stand against the existence of Louisiana Tech in the Sun Belt.

Good luck in the WAC. Hope you can represent southeastern collegiate football very well in the WAC.

But this I will promise you. The last place team in the Sun Belt this year will be one of the three teams leaving for the WAC!! Book it, buddy! It won't be ULM like you want!</span></span></span>

I am pretty sure that none of the Sun Belt teams headed for the WAC will finish last in the SBC.
Unless MSTU and Monroe improved drastically!!!!

<span style='font-family:Times'><span style='font-size:12pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:blue'>Well, there is a really good reason why Idaho is picked to finish last, however, I'm puzzled why everyone thinks New Mexico State will good. The Aggies of Las Cruces have worse defensive problems than we do.

And for the record, BroncoBob, MTSU defeated New Mexico State last year in convincing fashion and won against Idaho in the Hangar.

NMSU's only win over MTSU was by a field goal in a game held in Las Cruces.

I seriously believe New Mexico State will finish last and Idaho will likely finish second to last.

As much as I hate Utah State, they'll probably finish somewhere in the upper half of the conference, though they most certainly will not be able to win it.

MTSU lost five games last year by eight points or less. ULM lost five games by seven points or less. These two teams aren't bad. They just had bad fortune, BroncoBob. A play or two here in each one of those games involving those schools and last season's final standings would've been much different.</span></span></span>

[QUOTE]The Aggies of Las Cruces have worse defensive problems than we do.

How do you base any of your logic? do you even research before you spew nonsense outta your mouth?

NMSU defense ended up 40th nationally last year (after giving up a million pts to Texas) and return 10 starters.

BlueRaiderPride Wrote:

broncobob Wrote:

BlueRaiderPride Wrote:

SoCalValleyDog Wrote:SunBelt eh...

2004 Sun Belt

1. Troy
2. North Texas
3. New Mexico State
4. Utah State
5. Idaho
6. Louisiana
7. Arkansas State
8. MTSU
9. ULM

<span style='font-family:Times'><span style='font-size:12pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:blue'>Hold on! Why are you even worried about how the Sun Belt will finish and why are you posting this on a WAC messageboard, SoCalValleyDog? And worse, why are you responding to a David Krysakowski thread?

I know you want nothing but bad things for both Middle Tennessee and Louisiana-Monroe because of our very vehement and vocal stand against the existence of Louisiana Tech in the Sun Belt.

Good luck in the WAC. Hope you can represent southeastern collegiate football very well in the WAC.

But this I will promise you. The last place team in the Sun Belt this year will be one of the three teams leaving for the WAC!! Book it, buddy! It won't be ULM like you want!</span></span></span>

I am pretty sure that none of the Sun Belt teams headed for the WAC will finish last in the SBC.
Unless MSTU and Monroe improved drastically!!!!

<span style='font-family:Times'><span style='font-size:12pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:blue'>Well, there is a really good reason why Idaho is picked to finish last, however, I'm puzzled why everyone thinks New Mexico State will good. The Aggies of Las Cruces have worse defensive problems than we do.

And for the record, BroncoBob, MTSU defeated New Mexico State last year in convincing fashion and won against Idaho in the Hangar.

NMSU's only win over MTSU was by a field goal in a game held in Las Cruces.

I seriously believe New Mexico State will finish last and Idaho will likely finish second to last.

As much as I hate Utah State, they'll probably finish somewhere in the upper half of the conference, though they most certainly will not be able to win it.

MTSU lost five games last year by eight points or less. ULM lost five games by seven points or less. These two teams aren't bad. They just had bad fortune, BroncoBob. A play or two here in each one of those games involving those schools and last season's final standings would've been much different.</span></span></span>

Why the hatred for the Aggies?
I can understand hating the vandals, after all, THEY ARE VANDALS!!!!!!

From what I hear, ViAggie peed in his thermos, making his Bosco taste funny.

USU78 Wrote:From what I hear, ViAggie peed in his thermos, making his Bosco taste funny.

<span style='font-family:Times'><span style='font-size:12pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:blue'>Okay, I honestly do not care about Utah State anymore. They aren't a Sun Belt member anymore anyways. Our conference's future is in the Southeast, not the West.

And to XLGPP, any team that has to schedule a Division II team to find a guaranteed win is suspect no matter how you look at it. NMSU's 3-9 record last season and near loss to ULM has to boggle the mind especially considering that many media outlets predict NMSU to finish as high as second in the Sun Belt. But I'm guessing those outlets are located in the West.

Your team lost to five Sun Belt teams last year, XLGPP. Remind me which one of those Sun Belt teams wound up hammering your team by the widest margin?

You want to know who will win the Sun Belt this year? Don't look to the West. That team is going to come from the Southeast from either UNT, MTSU, or Troy. It certainly is EDUCATED to say that one of those three teams will win the Sun Belt this fall. </span></span></span>