Humans all came from Sub-Saharan Africa

Talk amongst yourselves...

I always knew I was an African-American.

Give me a f'ing break. A plurality of scientists have long theorized that the origin of Homo Sapiens was in Africa, but the idea that this somehow proves creationism is painfully ridiculous. Sure, the fact that our species arose in one area of the planet looks good for creationism...in a vacuum (i.e., if the whole of facts in the area of evolutionary science did not blatantly and pointedly contradict every single "principle" on which creationism is based). Even considering arguing about this sucks IQ points out of me like a Vulcan mind-meld.

This would actually contradict the biblical-literalist creationist account that the Garden of Eden was in the Middle East...fundamentalists don't believe Adam & Eve were black and wore afros. Of course they also believe a couple kangaroos swam or flew over from Australia to board the Ark...

ZippyRulz Wrote:This would actually contradict the biblical-literalist creationist account that the Garden of Eden was in the Middle East...fundamentalists don't believe Adam & Eve were black and wore afros. Of course they also believe a couple kangaroos swam or flew over from Australia to board the Ark...

Well, they're obviously wrong. Australia wasn't even around before the Flood. See, all the continents came about during the Flood.


^^
this all happened in 5 months


The 'roos then rode some rafts to Australia


thanks to Ken Ham for explaining this

Fanatical Wrote:

ZippyRulz Wrote:This would actually contradict the biblical-literalist creationist account that the Garden of Eden was in the Middle East...fundamentalists don't believe Adam & Eve were black and wore afros. Of course they also believe a couple kangaroos swam or flew over from Australia to board the Ark...

Well, they're obviously wrong. Australia wasn't even around before the Flood. See, all the continents came about during the Flood.


^^
this all happened in 5 months


The 'roos then rode some rafts to Australia


thanks to Ken Ham for explaining this

"When the flood destroyed the world's forests, it must have left billions of trees floating for centuries on the ocean. These log mats served as ready-made rafts for animals to cross oceans."

:yikes:

For some reason, my head hurts very bad all of the sudden...

That is only a small taste of the crap in Ken Ham's multi-million dollar museum

Fanatical Wrote:That is only a small taste of the crap in Ken Ham's multi-million dollar museum

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/200...210215.htm

ScienceDaily Wrote:The Creation Museum’s fossil exhibitions, though artistically impressive, include a vast number of scientific errors, large and small. These errors range from implying that the Earth’s sedimentary rocks were deposited by a single biblical Flood...

... because when tsunamis hit a coast the waters are very orderly, and don't mix everything they pick up. Of course, fossils were deposited before Pangaea rose up and somehow the fossils later deposited themselves in the correct order on the new land mass. If you look closely, you can see the floating forest.

Walking through it, I wasn't sure to laugh or be frustrated