http://www.memri.org/bin/opener_latest.cgi?ID=SD150807


....now, who would it be....who would it be........

How does this post not violate the AUP?

Mods?

Seems like a flagrant violation to me.

OUGwave Wrote:How does this post not violate the AUP?

Mods?

Seems like a flagrant violation to me.

How does it violate the AUP? I mentioned no names. None whatsoever. I'm going solely on what I "have" witnessed.

RebelKev Wrote:

OUGwave Wrote:How does this post not violate the AUP?

Mods?

Seems like a flagrant violation to me.

How does it violate the AUP? I mentioned no names. None whatsoever. I'm going solely on what I "have" witnessed.

Its a flame, and you know it is. You mention no names, but the attack is implicit against anyone who posts anything advocating an alternative to Bush's Iraq policy.

OUGwave Wrote:Its a flame, and you know it is. You mention no names, but the attack is implicit against anyone who posts anything advocating an alternative to Bush's Iraq policy.

Nope. Bush has nothing to do with it. I am merely pointing out that the people that post things like "We're losing in Iraq!" and "Oh MY GOD, We've lost 3K+ people in Iraq!!!!", etc., etc., etc. will fall for this.....hook.....line.....and sinker. If you think it's a flame, so be it. I see it as a given fact.....and I AM going on what I have witnessed, in protests, on these boards, on the radio, and in the halls of Congress.


.......or maybe you just want me censored.

By the way, when in the HELL did this board become one where I cannot attack liberalism? WTF? That is basically what you JUST said. I see others call Conservatives everything but a child of God on this board.

Puhleeze. Don't bring that **** to me, OU.

OUGwave Wrote:

RebelKev Wrote:

OUGwave Wrote:How does this post not violate the AUP?

Mods?

Seems like a flagrant violation to me.

How does it violate the AUP? I mentioned no names. None whatsoever. I'm going solely on what I "have" witnessed.

Its a flame, and you know it is. You mention no names, but the attack is implicit against anyone who posts anything advocating an alternative to Bush's Iraq policy.

Implicit? Maybe if you didn't use inferrences as your "common sense" and "reason", you'd be ok. There was NOTHING about "anyone who posts anythying advocating an alternative to Bush's Iraq policy." There were many ways to think about this article.

I would think the "open-minded" people on the left would delight in something w/ so many possibilities.

This is right wing propaganda. Straight Rovian tactic. I'm surprised yopu fell for it hook line and sinker. Political Jujitsu.

Quote:How does this post not violate the AUP?

Mods?

Seems like a flagrant violation to me.

OUG, I don't think it is a violation. I can't see who he is specifically attacking, there are a few candidates in my mind, but I don't know which one he's going after specifically. I think he's using abrasive tactics, but nothing which violates the AUP in my mind.

I see this as just a use of rhetoric to illustrate his point. No thin skins here. PM me if you think I missed something, please.

I hope we have some tactic for targeting their "weak minded".

what this says is nothing more than the art of war, "all warfare is based on deception". Its common sense however new since we are living in the internet age were the entire world is simultaneous connected. there are many documents uncovered from terrorist that show they are using the western media to their advantage, their "useful idiots" to borrow a cold war phrase.