Me and my son have watched a couple of episodes. It is taking me a while to get used to the octogon shape of the ring, but it does not appear to be too bad.

What does everyone else think?

According to me, Its not look nice as the ring in WWE and also the wrestlers are famous in WWE compare to TNA.

TNA is fantastic sports entertainment, and is gradually but certainly,, bodyslamming its WWE counterpart, when WWE loses a couple of its main attractions, like The Undertaker and HHH, they're done for, TNA is killing them. It's far more inclusive, diverse, a more level playing field for its roster members than WWE.

(10-26-2009 01:18 AM)smithgary Wrote:  According to me, Its not look nice as the ring in WWE and also the wrestlers are famous in WWE compare to TNA.

"Famous?"...Hmmm...Bret Hart*..Sting...Jeff Jarrett..Kurt Angle...Mick Foley (Cactus Jack)..Kevin Nash...HULK HOGAN? (almost doesn't get anymore famous than him)

I'm sure I can come up with some more later on...Sure, WWE is more establshed than TNA, but that is slowly but surely changing, and WWE's roster is going to take a major hit when The Undertaker and HHH leave the business, there not a whole lot left to cherish once they're gone...Big Show? Jericho? Cena?

IMO, Batista's one-dimensional and vastly overrated...