On the RA:
The only way I could see any reason to stop a Bible study from the RA would be if he was suing his position to preach to people who did not want to be preached to. Banning all RAs from Bible studies? Vast overreaction. I hope this did not stand up.
The Wren cross:
From my understanding of the cross situation, the cross was placed in a chapel, which had no previous cross. That's no better or worse than taking it out of the chapel. The length of its stay is of no concern. How long is long enough? 10 years? 50 years? 100 years?
In my limited experience this goes both ways and it is due in large part to ignorance of what separation of church and state means. This is when you get
minorities being persecuted for their beliefs, as well as the
majority losing the freedoms that they should have. Both are equally wrong in my book.
From what I understand it really isn't that hard to figure this out in most cases. Public institutions shouldn't show preference to any religion. Equal access for all, or no access for all. Private groups can use public building for religious matter (Bible studies, weddings, etc.) as long as every group has equal access to the facilities for similar purposes. A person in a public position cannot show any preference towards any group.
Some private groups take PC too far and start banning things on their own. Joe's Retail can tell their employees to not use the word Christmas, but they can't tell them to not go to church. most people will not be offended if you tell them Merry Christmas in this country. And they few that do may cry about it, but so what, don't shop at Joe's Retail if you don't like it. That's all you can do. And if you don't like "Happy Holidays" then you don't have to shop at Joe's retail either. Joe's just wants to cash in so they make the best business decision and cater to either one of the groups. I think a vast majority of the people in this country don't care either way, they just want to get their shopping done.
Well that's my position.