GDawgs88 Wrote:Whether or not Zito fits into your definition of ace, is it really that big of a deal? Did the Mets have one last year? Zito is at least equal to Glavine. There are a lot worse guys you could have anchoring your rotation.

always the voice of reason, terpy and i could've been going back and forth for a long time.

it's true though, zito's better than glavine at this point, it's be huge if the mets got him. it's not that glavine's that much better, but the big thing is the extra innings that zito will throw. the mets need someone to take pressure off the bullpen.