http://www.charlotte.com/mld/charlotte/n...807360.htm

Rove won't be charged in CIA leak. lmfao [/url]

Great!!! Now he can focus on

Quote:stopping Democrats from capturing the House or Senate in this November's elections

;-)

Actually I think the best thing he could do is just let the democrats hang themselves.

I've never seen a party more pitiful at capitalizing on favorable political environment.

Just because he wasn't charged doesn't mean he is not guilty. It just means they don't have enough evidence to try him at this time.

RobertN Wrote:Just because he wasn't charged doesn't mean he is not guilty. It just means they don't have enough evidence to try him at this time.

Whatever it takes let you sleep at night Rob. lmfao

RobertN Wrote:Just because he wasn't charged doesn't mean he is not guilty. It just means they don't have enough evidence to try him at this time.

And just because someone, like Libby, IS charged doesn't mean they are guilty. Any fair minded person will tell you that. But this is RobertN...

OptimisticOwl Wrote:

RobertN Wrote:Just because he wasn't charged doesn't mean he is not guilty. It just means they don't have enough evidence to try him at this time.

And just because someone, like Libby, IS charged doesn't mean they are guilty. Any fair minded person will tell you that. But this is RobertN...

I personally believe he is but I would never convict someone in a court of law without knowing the whole truth. I also believe Rove is guilty, again in my opinion but I would never convict someone in a court of law not knowing all the facts.

Quote:I personally believe he is but I would never convict someone in a court of law without knowing the whole truth. I also believe Rove is guilty, again in my opinion but I would never convict someone in a court of law not knowing all the facts.

So just so we're clear. You don't care anything about truth unless you're in a court of law, and then you do?

Interesting standard, but then you are liberal.

Ninerfan1 Wrote:

Quote:I personally believe he is but I would never convict someone in a court of law without knowing the whole truth. I also believe Rove is guilty, again in my opinion but I would never convict someone in a court of law not knowing all the facts.

So just so we're clear. You don't care anything about truth unless you're in a court of law, and then you do?

Interesting standard, but then you are liberal.

No. Based on what I know, I think he is guilty but I don't know all the facts so if I was on the jury(which I won't be so I can have whatever opinion I choose), I wouldn't let my personal opinion get in the way of deciding one way or another.

Quote:No. Based on what I know, I think he is guilty but I don't know all the facts so if I was on the jury(which I won't be so I can have whatever opinion I choose), I wouldn't let my personal opinion get in the way of deciding one way or another.

Of course you do, he's Karl Rove, the devil incarnate. The truth is the public knows very, very little about this, certainly not enough to make an informed decision.

But you want him to be guilty, you need him to be guilty, so naturally you're going to believe he is, despite knowing not much at all about the situation. At least be honest about this. If someone had just insinuated he might have done it you'd believe he was guilty.

And FYI, the only thing you could truly think him "guilty" of is purjury, since leaking her name wasn't a crime.

All Hail The Rove. All your courts are belong to us. lmfao

Ninerfan1 Wrote:

Quote:No. Based on what I know, I think he is guilty but I don't know all the facts so if I was on the jury(which I won't be so I can have whatever opinion I choose), I wouldn't let my personal opinion get in the way of deciding one way or another.

Of course you do, he's Karl Rove, the devil incarnate. The truth is the public knows very, very little about this, certainly not enough to make an informed decision.

But you want him to be guilty, you need him to be guilty, so naturally you're going to believe he is, despite knowing not much at all about the situation. At least be honest about this. If someone had just insinuated he might have done it you'd believe he was guilty.

And FYI, the only thing you could truly think him "guilty" of is purjury, since leaking her name wasn't a crime.

lmfao That is so classic. You accuse others of wanting Rove to be indicted because he's the "evil Karl Rove", but you support him for the very same reason - because of your political leanings. If he was in the Clinton administration you'd be howling for his head.

Quote: lmfao That is so classic. You accuse others of wanting Rove to be indicted because he's the "evil Karl Rove", but you support him for the very same reason - because of your political leanings. If he was in the Clinton administration you'd be howling for his head.

You dig this thread up after almost a month and this is the best you can come up with?

No, I support him because 1) he wasn't indicted and 2) leaking her name wasn't a crime. It has nothing to do with his political leanings.

But you keep thinking that junior. lmfao

Ninerfan1 Wrote:

Quote: lmfao That is so classic. You accuse others of wanting Rove to be indicted because he's the "evil Karl Rove", but you support him for the very same reason - because of your political leanings. If he was in the Clinton administration you'd be howling for his head.

You dig this thread up after almost a month and this is the best you can come up with?

No, I support him because 1) he wasn't indicted and 2) leaking her name wasn't a crime. It has nothing to do with his political leanings.

But you keep thinking that junior. lmfao

You have had 2 opportunities to say what you agree with Democrats on, and you just can't bring yourself to do it. You are partisan to the very core of your being, and you want ANYONE to believe that his political leanings have nothing to do with your support of Karl Rove? lmfao Whatever. If you are going to be aligned with the far right wing, at least have the courage to admit it.

Quote:You have had 2 opportunities to say what you agree with Democrats on, and you just can't bring yourself to do it.

I've stated I agree with them in general on most things because, in general, they and republicans agree. I've tried to explain to you that it's the "how" where the disagreement lies and not shockingly you can't tell me how they would accomplish anything. That says more about you than me.

Quote:You are partisan to the very core of your being,

Pot, meet kettle.

Quote:and you want ANYONE to believe that his political leanings have nothing to do with your support of Karl Rove? lmfao Whatever.

I don't want anyone to believe anything. See unlike you I don't worry about what people think of me or my opinions. I know the truth, I know what I believe. And the fact that you don't believe me has exactly no effect on any aspect of my life.

Quote:If you are going to be aligned with the far right wing, at least have the courage to admit it.

If I was, I would, but I'm not. But again, I don't care if you believe I am because frankly, you and your opinions mean absolutely nothing to me.

I don't read Ann Coulter, I don't listen to Limbaugh or Hannity. I've voted for democrats in my life because they were qualified and the "how" of their beliefs I endorsed. If Joe Liberman ran for President against John McCain I'd probably vote for Liberman. Same for Evan Byah (sp?) I will not vote for someone simply because they have an "R" next to their name.

But in the end that is more explaination than you deserve, cause I couldnt' care less what you believe or think of me. And that is a wonderful way to feel.