Well, this thread has deteriorated into nothing more than a "You Suck", "No, You Suck" match.

Now the Spin Room seems just like the old days.

Now, stop it!

Would it be OK if he responded to the content of my penultimate post?

OptimisticOwl Wrote:Would it be OK if he responded to the content of my penultimate post?

I don't know what that means, so I refuse to answer at this time. Feel free to discuss the issues passionately, just stay away from namecalling, etc.

GrayBeard Wrote:

OptimisticOwl Wrote:Would it be OK if he responded to the content of my penultimate post?

I don't know what that means, so I refuse to answer at this time. Feel free to discuss the issues passionately, just stay away from namecalling, etc.

Evidently I need to clarify my statement. I wasn't calling OO out for name calling specifically, instead it was a general statement to all those participating in this thread and the spin room to stay away from the name calling. Like I said, we can discuss things without the name calling.


And like the Central Florida YMCA teaches..."We are all winners". lmfao

GrayBeard Wrote:

GrayBeard Wrote:

OptimisticOwl Wrote:Would it be OK if he responded to the content of my penultimate post?

I don't know what that means, so I refuse to answer at this time. Feel free to discuss the issues passionately, just stay away from namecalling, etc.

Evidently I need to clarify my statement. I wasn't calling OO out for name calling specifically, instead it was a general statement to all those participating in this thread and the spin room to stay away from the name calling. Like I said, we can discuss things without the name calling.


And like the Central Florida YMCA teaches..."We are all winners". lmfao

Thanks.

OptimisticOwl Wrote:

JTiger Wrote:

OptimisticOwl Wrote:Sigh...

You are wrong to make the assumption that I would be saying it's a family issue, and and your assumption is wrong too. I would not. How much plainer can I make this? I would not. period. why do you assume I would, and why do you defend that assumption in the face of my denial?
You state that you are 'sure". On what statements of mine do base that assurance?

You can have all the opinions you want. That is what this board and the U S of A is about, but stop telling me what MY opinions are. I will tell you.

edit: I guess I have to explain every little word to you. I said the topic OF THE PERJURY is not important, it is still perjury. So yes, it doesn't matter is the President is lying under oath about sex, or press leaks, or about if he snores, the topic is not the controlling factor, it is the fact that he is LYING UNDER OATH, which is perjury regardless of the topic. I'm amazed that intelligent Americans cannot grasp this simple principle, that LYIN UNDER OATH is a violation of the law, regardless of the topic.

Second edit: So yes, if you ever get Bush under oath, and he testifies in any way on this matter that can later be shown to have been a lie, then he, like Clinton, will be guilty of perjury, and I will not, like the Clinton apologists did in his case, be trying to pas it off as just being a family issue. I will be calling for his impeachment on perjury charges just as i did Clinton. Perjury is perjury, it is not excused by the topic. or the person understandable reasons for lying.

Gosh, I hope this is clear to you, finally.

LOL, you're like the loser at work that keeps coming back to give me a piece of your mind. Thanks for the laugh.

Losers, and winners, wouldn't have to keep coming back to give you a piece of their mind if you would only use yours. Other than sneering and going away, you have not responded to anything I said. I am guessing you can't.

because I was too busy laughing at you... at least you made me laugh, I appreciate that

JTiger Wrote:

OptimisticOwl Wrote:

JTiger Wrote:

OptimisticOwl Wrote:Sigh...

You are wrong to make the assumption that I would be saying it's a family issue, and and your assumption is wrong too. I would not. How much plainer can I make this? I would not. period. why do you assume I would, and why do you defend that assumption in the face of my denial?
You state that you are 'sure". On what statements of mine do base that assurance?

You can have all the opinions you want. That is what this board and the U S of A is about, but stop telling me what MY opinions are. I will tell you.

edit: I guess I have to explain every little word to you. I said the topic OF THE PERJURY is not important, it is still perjury. So yes, it doesn't matter is the President is lying under oath about sex, or press leaks, or about if he snores, the topic is not the controlling factor, it is the fact that he is LYING UNDER OATH, which is perjury regardless of the topic. I'm amazed that intelligent Americans cannot grasp this simple principle, that LYIN UNDER OATH is a violation of the law, regardless of the topic.

Second edit: So yes, if you ever get Bush under oath, and he testifies in any way on this matter that can later be shown to have been a lie, then he, like Clinton, will be guilty of perjury, and I will not, like the Clinton apologists did in his case, be trying to pas it off as just being a family issue. I will be calling for his impeachment on perjury charges just as i did Clinton. Perjury is perjury, it is not excused by the topic. or the person understandable reasons for lying.

Gosh, I hope this is clear to you, finally.

LOL, you're like the loser at work that keeps coming back to give me a piece of your mind. Thanks for the laugh.

Losers, and winners, wouldn't have to keep coming back to give you a piece of their mind if you would only use yours. Other than sneering and going away, you have not responded to anything I said. I am guessing you can't.

because I was too busy laughing at you... at least you made me laugh, I appreciate that

Your laughing at facts you cannot refute defines you more than me.

OK, choose one:

1. Lying under oath is always wrong.
2. Lying under oath is sometimes OK.

Silly liberals.

What is REALLY funny is listening to the leftys defend Mary McCarthy's leaking of CIA black sites in the midst of a war, while at the same time labeling Cheney/Bush/Libby as traitors because of the whole Plame non-story.

Apparently pinko libs have absolutely no self respect.