NY Times Article Here

This is an interesting article. This will cause one horrific uproar from both sides. Put in the ear plugs, as the screaming is about to begin.

nevermind*

Too bad the article doesn't talk about the legislation at all. I would be interested to see how the law differed from Roe vs. Wade. If it isn't different, I don't think anything is going to change.

blah Wrote:Too bad the article doesn't talk about the legislation at all. I would be interested to see how the law differed from Roe vs. Wade. If it isn't different, I don't think anything is going to change.

Then what would be the purpose of it? My take was it was going to be a drastic change, but I am not sure.

GrayBeard Wrote:

blah Wrote:Too bad the article doesn't talk about the legislation at all. I would be interested to see how the law differed from Roe vs. Wade. If it isn't different, I don't think anything is going to change.

Then what would be the purpose of it? My take was it was going to be a drastic change, but I am not sure.

Although I think both Alito and Roberts are conservative, unless something is different, I don't see them going against already decided law. I could be wrong and I think you know what side of this I am on, but I just think from a legal side they aren't going back with out something new in front of them.

All I will say is I am against abortions as a means of birth control. if you are adult enough to have sex then you are adult enough to have weighed the consequensces of your actions. And I think too many people view it as such...a form of birth control.