Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
For H. Dean fans
Author Message
DrTorch Offline
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
*

Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:

CrappiesDonatorsBalance of Power Contest
Post: #1
 
For those of you who are fans of Howard Dean, like it or not, this recent turmoil is identical to what Trent Lott went through.

The political times are such that every comment is taken at its worst, and every opponent will do what he/she can to take down the other. The media do their best to aid this feeding frenzy...after all, they're just concerned about readership&ratings.

When I was at Bowling Green, I took a class about the French Revolution. One point I remember is that at his trial for treason, Danton made this claim to Robespierre:

"Robespierre will follow me; I drag down Robespierre."

Danton was executed April 5, 1794.

Robespierre was arrested and sent to the guillotine on July 28, 1794.

We could argue and debate all day as to when this political animosity escalated in the US. But regardless, welcome to the party. Just remember how bloody it got in 18th century France.
11-05-2003 09:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


KlutzDio I Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,120
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #2
 
I hear Bowling Green has a very good ethics program in the philosophy department.

Anyway, Dean is a trojan-horse! Anyone know who the Dean is in Morgan, Stanley, Dean, Witter?

BTW, four-wheel drive truck-drivin', confederate flag wavin', mullet sportin' rednecks are racists. But I fully support their freedom to do all of that if they so choose!
11-05-2003 01:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
joebordenrebel Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,968
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #3
 
Not all of us are rednecks. Some of us even cut our mullets.

But this is NOT the same thing as the Trent Lott debacle. He SAID too bad Mr. Grand Dragon of the Dixiecrat party (you know, the Democrats who couldn't stomach civil rights for all Americans) that you didn't win the presidency ::chuckle chuckle::.

Dean just said he wanted some good ole boys to vote for him too. That's it. Everything else you load into it is YOUR baggage!
11-07-2003 06:12 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GrayBeard Offline
Whiny Troll
*

Posts: 33,012
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 880
I Root For: My Kids & ECU
Location: 523 Miles From ECU

Crappies
Post: #4
 
In a recent interview, this Dean character stated that he wanted to regulate business!

Then said that, that is the only way capitalism works for the common man. (paraphrasing)

Sorry Dr. Dean, but that is socialism/communism, not capitalism!

This guy is way left of liberal! :stupid: 03-puke
11-21-2003 08:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wryword Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 974
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #5
 
Howard Dean's comments about the Confederate flag "in" pick-up trucks said it all about the vast divide between the National Socialist Party and the masses they pretend to care so much about. It was the ultimate in an insult by a cossetted Northeastern type who knows nothing about anything outside of the bell jar in which he lives. And I think this is great. I hope to see the complete destruction of the National Democrat party; I hope to see them fall in upon themselves. They are profoundly contemptous of constitutional government, ignorant of how people live and what they aspire to do in life, and are merely intent upon creating a small oligarchy among themselves, imposing a kind of paternal but socially and economically dictatorial government here.

It isn't that the Repubs are much better. I despise this spending they are about, despise the fact that they have no more respect for the constitution than the party of Hillary!, and the fact that they are just, well, stupid sometimes.

But the Repubs are less of a threat than Hillary! and the rest of them. So anything that this fool Dean can do to cost them votes is great.

Did you all know that Dean declared himself a metrosexual just a week or two before making his comment about the flag and pick'em up trucks? Has anyone here seen a Southern metrosexual in a pick'em up wid a flag "in" it?

Run, Dean, run! I had been supporting Al Sharpton for the Democrat nomination, but now I think I like Dean.
11-25-2003 07:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


KlutzDio I Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,120
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #6
 
There is only one president to have waged war during his first term, not to be reelected later
12-01-2003 02:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
joebordenrebel Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,968
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #7
 
And even if you can't get the amazingly small number of people who still care about politics in this country anymore (because, oddly enough, they don't see how it impacts them! in a democracy!) to keep voting for King Know Knothing, at least Diebold will protect your sacred frat boy AWOLer!

<a href='http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm' target='_blank'>http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm</a>
12-02-2003 05:27 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wryword Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 974
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #8
 
As for the comments to the effect that large American business interests did business in Germany after Hitler's accession to power, up until 1941, when Germany declared war upon us, this is correct. In fact, Ford had a large plant in Germany.

And, so what? At the time, and you can only measure things in the context of their times, the Wannsee conference had not occurred, and the full extent of the evil of Hitlerism was not manifest.

There is no fault in trading with a country that is engaged in war with one's friends. Done all the time, for reasons that ought to be obvious. But if they aren't obvious, let me point out that in international law it is a casus belli to cut off trade with another country, absent a state of declared or de facto hostility.

Business is not a system of morality. The wealth of this country is founded upon business, not government, not the wishful thinking of gentle utopians. It is foolish and dangerous to expect or require business to operate on considerations outside of itself.

But for every Republican said to have done bidness with fascists, you will surely find a New Dealer who did the same. So what's the point? When war with Germany came, they were all Americans, a thing I cannot say about you Hillarites today.
12-02-2003 08:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
joebordenrebel Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,968
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #9
 
Quote:As for the comments to the effect that large American business interests did business in Germany after Hitler's accession to power, up until 1941, when Germany declared war upon us, this is correct.&nbsp; In fact, Ford had a large plant in Germany.


Was this in another thread? I'm not sure what started you on this pro-bidness diatribe but let me attempt to respond nevertheless.

Bidness does indeed have a morality to uphold; otherwise, we'd all just sell our souls to the company store and return to chattel slavery. If Ford lined the pockets of people killing Jews, that's not just something we can wish away or rationalize.

Likewise, if we invade a country like Vietnam or Iraq in order to manufacture more helicopters or Napalm then those actions have consequences. Even a solipsist could see that.

Quote:But for every Republican said to have done bidness with fascists, you will surely find a New Dealer who did the same.&nbsp; So what's the point?&nbsp; When war with Germany came, they were all Americans, a thing I cannot say about you Hillarites today.


Okay, there's blood on both parties' hands. Agreed. Equal amounts I'm not so sure about, but I really don't care to argue the point. However, to jump from there to complete dismissal of Hillarites (and to lump me in with the pro-bidness Democans) as American-hating is a ludicrous attempt to make a point, esquire.

Check.
12-03-2003 12:44 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


KlutzDio I Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,120
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #10
 
I know everything there is to know about the shrimpin' bidness.
12-03-2003 04:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
KlutzDio I Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,120
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #11
 
Wry, I was just pointing out that conservative Americans traded with the enemy because you seemed to have a disdain for New Dealers who had done the same.

There are skeletons in everyone's closet, even George W. Bush's (and Ron Reagan's).

Like Robert Penn Warren said in All the King's Men:
"Man is conceived in sin, born in corruption and he passeth from the didie of the stench to the stink of the shroud."

Also, America was quite the pro-Hitler state prior to 1939 when he invaded Poland. America was pro-Hitler because he brought Germany out of the Great Depression quicker (and the Weimar was in very poor shape prior to the 1929 Crash). Many Americans thought we needed a Hitler-like fascist to restore American business prowess. Americans, furthermore, liked Hitlers racist politics because Americans have been, historically (for the most part) a racist and violent people.

But, we mobilized and whipped them Krauts! You gotta love capitalism!

Anyway, I think that's the big problem with the world, that is, we seem to separate morality (moral spheres) from business (commerce spheres) when actually, procuring a lifestyle for yourself and your family is, indeed, a moral action. It is a moral duty for one to go out and do whatever it takes to make sure his or her family is fed and is provided for. Today, most people do this by selling a portion of themselves in order to grab a fistful of dimes so they can buy crap to hang on the x-mas tree.
To walk in and out of moral spheres for the sake of making gobs of money (that no one could possibly ever need) is greed
12-03-2003 04:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wryword Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 974
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #12
 
KlutzDio I Wrote:I know everything there is to know about the shrimpin' bidness.
That impresses hell out of me, Dio
12-03-2003 10:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wryword Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 974
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #13
 
America was in an isolationist state of mind prior to Pearl Harbor, which is why the deified Franklin had to ignore the impending attack on Pearl Harbor. It is why he had to lie to the American people before that when he said, with his elegant, cultured voice, that no American boy would die in a foreign war. Democrats have ever been liars and frauds since the day of the deified Franklin.

Isolationism is hardly the same thing as pro-Nazism. It is true that there was a significant group of Americans, Lindberg being one, enamored of Hitlerism. But it is a huge error to say that America was "pro" Nazi. What America in those days was, was the attitude of "let Europe handle Europe's issues". How very sensible they were.

It should be that way today. We should intervene in the affairs of the world only where and when our particular national interests are involved.
12-03-2003 10:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


rickheel Offline
The Old Bastard
*

Posts: 8,468
Joined: Feb 2002
Reputation: 11
I Root For: Heels
Location:

Donators
Post: #14
 
Dean declined to fight in Vietnam, finagling for a deferment because of a minor back problem. But within a short time--after graduating from Yale in 1971-- he spent a year skiing and bumming around Aspen, Colorado. While skiing the slopes, he smoked a bit of pot, worked as a dish washer and a concrete pourer, and consumed large amounts of beer.

and they fuss about Bush.......btw, Dean claims he got health care for Vermont. Guess how much of Vermont is no Medicare/Medicade?


I, for one, want Dean to be the Dem's nomination. PLEASE! 04-bow

Lets open his records from Vermont and take a look at what he really did for the past 10 years.
12-04-2003 06:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
rickheel Offline
The Old Bastard
*

Posts: 8,468
Joined: Feb 2002
Reputation: 11
I Root For: Heels
Location:

Donators
Post: #15
 
Maybe he could get KKK Byrd to run with him........

I know hil loves him.....even if he uses the N word

Posted on 11/20/2003 2:31 PM PST by kattracks



In a little noticed ceremony before she flew off to attend Iowa's Jefferson-Jackson Dinner Saturday night, Sen. Hillary Clinton presented ex-Klansman-turned-Senator Robert Byrd with the Franklin Roosevelt Institute's Four Freedoms Award.
Addressing the crowd in Hyde Park, NY, Mrs. Clinton praised Byrd as a mentor, saying he provided a wonderful example for her.

"When I think of the Senate, I think of Robert Byrd," the former first lady said, according to an account in the Hyde Park Townsman.

It was during Roosevelt's third presidential term that Byrd joined the Klan, saying he wanted to fight communism. And though he left within a year, he continued to advise Klan leaders on how to expand the influence of the anti-black terror group.

In 1971, Byrd cosponsored a measure to have the Senate's main office building named after Sen. Richard Russell, an unabashed white supremacist who led the fight against anti-lynching legislation in the Senate.

"He was kind of my mentor," Byrd said recently, noting that Sen. Russell was known as an expert on Senate rules, much like himself.

In 2001 Byrd was forced to apologize after he blurted out the "N"-word twice during a nationally televised interview.


Whats that about an old dog.............
12-04-2003 06:19 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
KlutzDio I Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,120
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #16
 
Wryword Wrote:America was in an isolationist state of mind prior to Pearl Harbor, which is why the deified Franklin had to ignore the impending attack on Pearl Harbor. It is why he had to lie to the American people before that when he said, with his elegant, cultured voice, that no American boy would die in a foreign war. Democrats have ever been liars and frauds since the day of the deified Franklin.

Isolationism is hardly the same thing as pro-Nazism. It is true that there was a significant group of Americans, Lindberg being one, enamored of Hitlerism. But it is a huge error to say that America was "pro" Nazi. What America in those days was, was the attitude of "let Europe handle Europe's issues". How very sensible they were.

It should be that way today. We should intervene in the affairs of the world only where and when our particular national interests are involved.
Wry, if you think it is a stretch to say America was "pro" Hitler back in the 30s, then I challenge you to look at some old newspapers between the years 1933 and 1939, especially the years 1935 and 1936. William Shirer published a book and the title escapes me at this point but the book is a collection of his reports from Berlin between 1932 and 1939 (when he fled). In his reports he often states that he was horrified by Hitler's popularity and policies, and oftentimes Shirer was amazed at Hitler's political shrewdness. In one entry, Shirer (who was a scum sucking liberal journalist) said the U.S. needed a Hitler-like politician because the man knew how to get things done. (see, that's the difference between a one-party system and America's two-party system. In the former things happen, the government governs while in the latter you have gridlock because politicos are too concerned with getting reelected.)

Anyway, that is one guy. Read some old newspapers from the era, especially the op-ed pages and you might want to think differently about America being merely an isolationist state. You may agree with me that America, back then, was largely pro-Hitler.

Speaking with my grandpa, he said Southerners (in the 1930s) loved Hitler. My grandpa was about 16 or 17 when Chamberlain had his famous meeting with Hitler and at that time, gramps said Americans were beginning to change their minds about Hitler. He did add, however, that many Americans applauded Hitler's effort in rebuilding Germany before the dictator got aggressive. My grandfather said he read papers daily and he was always wanting to know what was going on overseas and he said he always read reports on Europe, especially Germany.

About FDR, one thing that I unearthed when studying WW2 was that FDR really wanted the Japs to attack. FDR's administration decided to cut off the Japs' oil supply (via the U.S.A) so the Japs would indeed wage war with the U.S.
I never read anything that said this outright, but I uncovered enough evidence to support an argument to that effect.

In regard to your last setiments, what do you think about the current war? does Iraq and its problems constitute "particular national interests"?
12-04-2003 06:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Wryword Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 974
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #17
 
Dio, like I have said somewhere else, I haven't yet been convinced that Saddam needed taking out at this time. I don't doubt that the world and Iraq in particular will be better off without that creature, but I can't say that our national interests required this. Our interests did require the war in 1991, but that was a different matter. Quite frankly, I suspect that George II is settling scores with Saddam. Remember that there was an attempt to kill George I just after he left office.

There were many in the US who felt that Hitler was a good thing in the 1930's. I think I mentioned Charles Lindberg being one of those. But then the true evil of the Nazi regime was not apparent then. What people were seeing was the resurrection of a totally destroyed economic system, the building of the Autobahns,a sense of disciplineand order, and it all seemed like a good thing. But for every Hitler admirer, there were more people here who believed in isolationism.

I too believe that the deified Franklin took no action to prevent the attack on Peal Harbor, and I believe he did it because there was no way other than an attack to get the country to go to war. His various economic plans and policies had failed; war was the thing to put the entire country into jobs. He had been treading close to belligerency status by the Lend-Lease program with Britain as it was. He had gone as far as the Congress would have permitted with that dalliance with the European war, absent a Lusitania incident, a thing the Germans were not going to repeat.
12-04-2003 07:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.