To:

Well, Undersigned, coming from you, I think that will be that for Mr. Boortz

Neal is a man of character and, while a Libertarian, has openly been against the Libertarian's policy of isolationism. What's wrong JBR? Can't stand to see someone that will disagree with their own party? Someone that doesn't walk lock-step? I applaud the talkmaster. What the "F" happened when we tried isolationism before Dec. 7th '41?

The trouble in '41 is that we weren't isolationists. We were actively supplying Britain with war material, and we imposed an embargo against Japan. That ain't isolationism, and anybody who says that we were practising what most of the country wanted is a liar. The deified Franklin was taking the country to the very limit of belligerency, and then he finally got what he needed: an armed response.

RebelKev Wrote:Neal is a man of character and, while a Libertarian, has openly been against the Libertarian's policy of isolationism. What's wrong JBR? Can't stand to see someone that will disagree with their own party? Someone that doesn't walk lock-step? I applaud the talkmaster. What the "F" happened when we tried isolationism before Dec. 7th '41?

Nothing wrong, Kev. Just wondered what you thought about the high priest's heterodox views.

It seems to me that if one were going to call oneself something then one might want to follow their basic ideological tenets. Call me crazy. :D