Like?

TUDIEHARD Wrote:Like?

I think you need to upgrade your sig, cheapskate!

Here's just one psychotic thing the President said prior to the war:

"the world will, indeed, be much safer if it's a world without Saddam Hussein."


The above statement is psychotic because who would actually believe that? The world we live in is unsafe, period! Our world is a hostile environment for us, always has been and always will be. I can't believe the Prez actually believes such garbage. To say the safety of the world depends on one man is insulting to my intelligence and for him to add this on his 'case for war' as if his statement could sway public opinion.
I think GW is just about the dumbest person I've ever had the pleasure of meeting (I met him in 92 when he was campaigning for his pappy).

KlutzDio I Wrote:Here's just one psychotic thing the President said prior to the war:

"the world will, indeed, be much safer if it's a world without Saddam Hussein."


The above statement is psychotic because who would actually believe that? The world we live in is unsafe, period! Our world is a hostile environment for us, always has been and always will be. I can't believe the Prez actually believes such garbage. To say the safety of the world depends on one man is insulting to my intelligence and for him to add this on his 'case for war' as if his statement could sway public opinion.
I think GW is just about the dumbest person I've ever had the pleasure of meeting (I met him in 92 when he was campaigning for his pappy).

Do you know how to read?

he said "...MUCH SAFER..." Not 100% safe, but much safer, and frankly he's right.

flyingswoosh Wrote:he said "...MUCH SAFER..." Not 100% safe, but much safer, and frankly he's right.

Maybe you could explain how we are safer now that Saddam is in our custody?

I for one, did not fear the Iraqis and Saddam on my morning commute prior to the war. So, I'm curious. Did you encounter Saddam and the Iraqis on your way to work? Those pesky Iraqis! When will they learn? Yeah, I heard they were conducting amphibious assaults on Florida back in March of this year. That's why Bush had to send our fighting men and women over there to protect Florida!

Be real now, dude. Saddam was not a threat. Have you considered the fact we watched him like a hawk prior to the invasion?

In conclusion, I don't think the world is any more or less safe now that we have Saddam and the nation of Iraq. Actually, Iraq is much less safer for U.S. and international personnel in the country. Have you heard of all the terrorist attacks going on over there?

I guess not.

KlutzDio I Wrote:

flyingswoosh Wrote:he said "...MUCH SAFER..."  Not 100% safe, but much safer, and frankly he's right.

Maybe you could explain how we are safer now that Saddam is in our custody?

I for one, did not fear the Iraqis and Saddam on my morning commute prior to the war. So, I'm curious. Did you encounter Saddam and the Iraqis on your way to work? Those pesky Iraqis! When will they learn? Yeah, I heard they were conducting amphibious assaults on Florida back in March of this year. That's why Bush had to send our fighting men and women over there to protect Florida!

Be real now, dude. Saddam was not a threat. Have you considered the fact we watched him like a hawk prior to the invasion?

In conclusion, I don't think the world is any more or less safe now that we have Saddam and the nation of Iraq. Actually, Iraq is much less safer for U.S. and international personnel in the country. Have you heard of all the terrorist attacks going on over there?

I guess not.

you didn't and most americans didn't but Iraqi's did.....