Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
Best division in baseball
Author Message
1125 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,957
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 18
I Root For: Cincinnati, NKU
Location: Cincinnati

Folding@NCAAbbsSkunkworks
Post: #21
 
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:red'>How 'bout 'dem REDS?</span></span>
04-24-2004 10:09 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cbfranchise3 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,348
Joined: Oct 2003
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #22
 
UCBearcats1125 Wrote:<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:red'>How 'bout 'dem REDS?</span></span>
They will cool off.
04-26-2004 09:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GDawgs88 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,930
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 8
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #23
 
cbfranchise3 Wrote:
UCBearcats1125 Wrote:<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:red'>How 'bout 'dem REDS?</span></span>
They will cool off.
Most likely. But you never know if they can keep Griffey healthy.
04-27-2004 02:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DukeofDrums Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 703
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 14
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location: Western Hills
Post: #24
 
The Red's will get it back.
05-01-2004 01:55 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
1125 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,957
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 18
I Root For: Cincinnati, NKU
Location: Cincinnati

Folding@NCAAbbsSkunkworks
Post: #25
 
3 straight in the L column...Should have won both Milwaukee games.
05-01-2004 02:04 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GDawgs88 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,930
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 8
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #26
 
4 losses in a row now...
05-03-2004 03:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cbfranchise3 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,348
Joined: Oct 2003
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #27
 
They are playing Houston, what did you expect?
05-03-2004 04:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCBearcat4ever Away
All American
*

Posts: 3,310
Joined: May 2004
Reputation: 39
I Root For: Bearcats
Location: Cincinnati
Post: #28
 
IMO, The NL Central is the best division in MLB, because great players in Sosa, Clemens, Griffey, Pettite, and a few others, this division is alsso compettive, because the Champ haven't been determined until september
05-06-2004 10:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
flyingswoosh Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 15,863
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 69
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #29
 
ucbearcat4ever Wrote:IMO, The NL Central is the best division in MLB, because great players in Sosa, Clemens, Griffey, Pettite, and a few others, this division is alsso compettive, because the Champ haven't been determined until september
that's an awful way to determine a great division. Plus, Griffey is not a great player. The NL west is by no means the best division, but they have Bonds, Schmidt, Helton, Gagne, Sexson, Gonzo, Webb, Johnson, etc. See what i mean? All divisions have great players.
05-06-2004 02:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GDawgs88 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,930
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 8
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #30
 
ucbearcat4ever Wrote:this division is alsso compettive, because the Champ haven't been determined until september
No division is decided before September.
05-06-2004 04:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cbfranchise3 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,348
Joined: Oct 2003
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #31
 
flyingswoosh Wrote:
ucbearcat4ever Wrote:IMO, The NL Central is the best division in MLB, because great players in Sosa, Clemens, Griffey, Pettite, and a few others, this division is alsso compettive, because the Champ haven't been determined until september
that's an awful way to determine a great division. Plus, Griffey is not a great player. The NL west is by no means the best division, but they have Bonds, Schmidt, Helton, Gagne, Sexson, Gonzo, Webb, Johnson, etc. See what i mean? All divisions have great players.
Yea, I agree. And those aren't even the good players in this division anymore. Mark Prior, Albert Pujols, Kerry Wood, and as you said Clemens are the class of players in this division now,
05-06-2004 04:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
tysramm1 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 576
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #32
 
flyingswoosh Wrote:
ucbearcat4ever Wrote:IMO, The NL Central is the best division in MLB, because great players in Sosa, Clemens, Griffey, Pettite, and a few others, this division is alsso compettive, because the Champ haven't been determined until september
that's an awful way to determine a great division. Plus, Griffey is not a great player. The NL west is by no means the best division, but they have Bonds, Schmidt, Helton, Gagne, Sexson, Gonzo, Webb, Johnson, etc. See what i mean? All divisions have great players.
if griffey is not a great player, then schmidt is not even a good player
05-06-2004 05:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
1125 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,957
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 18
I Root For: Cincinnati, NKU
Location: Cincinnati

Folding@NCAAbbsSkunkworks
Post: #33
 
tysramm1 Wrote:
flyingswoosh Wrote:
ucbearcat4ever Wrote:IMO, The NL Central is the best division in MLB, because great players in Sosa, Clemens, Griffey, Pettite, and a few others, this division is alsso compettive, because the Champ haven't been determined until september
that's an awful way to determine a great division. Plus, Griffey is not a great player. The NL west is by no means the best division, but they have Bonds, Schmidt, Helton, Gagne, Sexson, Gonzo, Webb, Johnson, etc. See what i mean? All divisions have great players.
if griffey is not a great player, then schmidt is not even a good player
Griffey has not been good in the past 4 years
05-06-2004 05:43 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GDawgs88 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,930
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 8
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #34
 
Griffey's time came and went. He was an unbelievable player in the 90's, but since the turn of the century, he's been a big bust.
05-06-2004 07:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
tysramm1 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 576
Joined: Sep 2003
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #35
 
griffey is still a star, and when healthy capable of greatness
05-06-2004 08:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
flyingswoosh Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 15,863
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation: 69
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #36
 
tysramm1 Wrote:griffey is still a star, and when healthy capable of greatness
what?!!! i'd expect that from someone who had a slave.
05-06-2004 09:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cbfranchise3 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,348
Joined: Oct 2003
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #37
 
Griffey is not a star. I would take Kearns over Griffey right now.
05-06-2004 09:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GDawgs88 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 7,930
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation: 8
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #38
 
tysramm, even when Griffey's been healthy this year he hasn't looked good. I think he's only hitting around .230.
05-07-2004 01:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
1125 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,957
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 18
I Root For: Cincinnati, NKU
Location: Cincinnati

Folding@NCAAbbsSkunkworks
Post: #39
 
cbfranchise3 Wrote:Griffey is not a star. I would take Kearns over Griffey right now.
Well Kearns is injured right now...So I would actually take Griffey
05-07-2004 02:36 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
cbfranchise3 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,348
Joined: Oct 2003
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #40
 
UCBearcats1125 Wrote:
cbfranchise3 Wrote:Griffey is not a star.&nbsp; I would take Kearns over Griffey right now.
Well Kearns is injured right now...So I would actually take Griffey
When they are both healthy, I would take Kearns.
05-07-2004 04:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread:


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.