<a href='http://www.iht.com/articles/534474.html' target='_blank'>Nader fights for a fighting chance </a>

This is just disgusting. The democrats have no shame.

How can anyone justify trying to keep someone off of a ballot. Yes, the dimocrats are the party of inclusion and compassion !

I wish people would open up their damn eyes.

GrayBeard Wrote:How can anyone justify trying to keep someone off of a ballot. Yes, the dimocrats are the party of inclusion and compassion !

And Republicans are the party of principle.

<a href='http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60340-2004Jul18.html' target='_blank'>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...-2004Jul18.html</a>

<a href='http://abcnews.go.com/sections/WNT/Politics/nader_040724-1.html' target='_blank'>http://abcnews.go.com/sections/WNT/Politic...r_040724-1.html</a>

<a href='http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1279929,00.html' target='_blank'>http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/...1279929,00.html</a>

<a href='http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/07/09/MNGQQ7J31K1.DTL' target='_blank'>http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file...MNGQQ7J31K1.DTL</a>

<a href='http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200409/littlefield2' target='_blank'>http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200409/littlefield2</a>

:snore:

Which one is unconsitutional Schad?

Schadenfreude Wrote:

GrayBeard Wrote:How can anyone justify trying to keep someone off of a ballot.&nbsp; Yes, the dimocrats are the party of inclusion and compassion !

And Republicans are the party of principle.

<a href='http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60340-2004Jul18.html' target='_blank'>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/artic...-2004Jul18.html</a>

<a href='http://abcnews.go.com/sections/WNT/Politics/nader_040724-1.html' target='_blank'>http://abcnews.go.com/sections/WNT/Politic...r_040724-1.html</a>

<a href='http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1279929,00.html' target='_blank'>http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/...1279929,00.html</a>

<a href='http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/07/09/MNGQQ7J31K1.DTL' target='_blank'>http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file...MNGQQ7J31K1.DTL</a>

<a href='http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200409/littlefield2' target='_blank'>http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200409/littlefield2</a>

:snore:

So, I take it you are excusing the behaviour of the dimocrats?

GrayBeard Wrote:So, I take it you are excusing the behaviour of the dimocrats?

I'm saying it's politics.

Republicans have cynically tried to help Nader get on the ballot in many states. Now Democrats are cynically pursuing the legal avenues available to them to keep Nader off the ballot.

Get off the moral high horse. It's politics.

Trying to support another to allow him to garner more votes from your opponant is immoral. Trying to take away someone's right is unconstitutional. Yes Schad, there is a difference.

Quote:Get off the moral high horse. It's politics.

Statements like this make me want to . People use politics to justify things that are absolutely unconscionable. We are becoming a Machiavellian society. :(

RebelKev Wrote:Trying to support another to allow him to garner more votes from your opponant is immoral. Trying to take away someone's right is unconstitutional. Yes Schad, there is a difference.

<a href='http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/01/20/ny.mccain/' target='_blank'>http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/storie...1/20/ny.mccain/</a>

:snore:

Quote:Get off the moral high horse. It's politics.

:laugh: what was that saying about glass houses?

Schadenfreude Wrote:

RebelKev Wrote:Trying to support another to allow him to garner more votes from your opponant is immoral. Trying to take away someone's right is unconstitutional. Yes Schad, there is a difference.

<a href='http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/01/20/ny.mccain/' target='_blank'>http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/storie...1/20/ny.mccain/</a>

:snore:

Justifying your guys dishonesty, because the other side has done it, is a childish reaction. It is wrong, no matter who is doing it. I should have figured that you wouldn't admit to just how wrong it is!

***Just as a side note***when and if there is a viable conservative third party candidate, they will probably get my vote. I have gone 3rd party before!