Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
What you right wingers won't answer!!
Author Message
Dogger Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 770
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:

Crappies
Post: #1
 
Wouldn't it have been reasonable to target this place as a potential site of WMD's. We knew it had VMX and other high grade explosives. Why wouldn't have we designated this site and gaurded it immediately. How could we have left this whole site ungaurded but GAURD the ministry of oil on the first day. We gaurded the oil platforms before we went in. If we truly went in for WMD's, why didn't we gaurd this place from Day 1?????
10-29-2004 12:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


ccs178 Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,912
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 26
I Root For: Southern Miss
Location: 39402

CrappiesCrappiesDonators
Post: #2
 
Dogger Wrote:Wouldn't it have been reasonable to target this place as a potential site of WMD's.  We knew it had VMX and other high grade explosives.  Why wouldn't have we designated this site and gaurded it immediately. How could we have left this whole site ungaurded but GAURD the ministry of oil on the first day.  We gaurded the oil platforms before we went in.  If we truly went in for WMD's,  why didn't we gaurd this place from Day 1?????
You are sad. It is getting painful to watch you implode like this. No, scratch that. It's pretty funny. You are still trying to turn this one site into an issue. You keep banging your head against the wall, repeating the same lies and trying to find something...some hook to hang your "I hate Dubya" hat on. Have fun pissing into the wind, Dogger.
10-29-2004 12:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Ninerfan1 Offline
Habitual Line Stepper
*

Posts: 9,867
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 146
I Root For: Charlotte
Location:
Post: #3
 
Let's see. Could it be that the facility wasn't the type you'd use to house chemical weapons? Could it be that Saddam was smart enough not to house such weapons at a place that can be easily viewed from satellite?
10-29-2004 12:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Lethemeul Offline
Fancy Pants
*

Posts: 3,591
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 66
I Root For: Pirates!
Location: Boogie all the time

NCAAbbs LUGDonatorsFolding@NCAAbbs
Post: #4
 
Dogger Wrote:Wouldn't it have been reasonable to target this place as a potential site of WMD's. We knew it had VMX and other high grade explosives. Why wouldn't have we designated this site and gaurded it immediately. How could we have left this whole site ungaurded but GAURD the ministry of oil on the first day. We gaurded the oil platforms before we went in. If we truly went in for WMD's, why didn't we gaurd this place from Day 1?????
You, sir, are about to drive me insane. What won't we answer? We've all tried to explain to you:

1) We, as in nobody, know whether those explosives were there when our troops arrived or not. The doors were sealed, but the inside of the bunkers could be accessed through ventilation shafts. You and your ilk have decided that this is the issue of the friggin' election. You will not listen to reason. If the facts come out and point to an error, I'll be one of the first to say that somebody made a boo-boo and since the buck stops at the top, I'll blame W. But until then, I'm skeptical of a story that was leaked by a UN official who will most likely lose his job if W is re-elected. How dare me!

2) What you want us to answer is an idiotic question that I've tried to answer, along with almost everybody else. We can't guard a place we haven't reached yet during a war that hasn't been fought yet. Again, prove to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that those weapons were there.

3) I'm tired of this Ministry of Oil crap. We did not go into Iraq for oil. If we had, that would be the blunder of the war. In case you haven't noticed, oil is off the charts. Gas prices are rising. If we went for oil, we failed. Also, The Iraqi people will make their living off of the juice beneath their feet. Protiecting that infrastructure was high on the list because it will feed them and help them become prosperous. So please shut the freak up with this black helicopter, conspiratorial, spurrious accusation.

In closing, do us all a favor and wait until we know what happened. You posted a link to a NYT article that you said proved the explosives were there. I saw nothing like that in there. I am willing to wait to find out the facts. You should be too.
10-29-2004 12:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GrayBeard Offline
Whiny Troll
*

Posts: 33,240
Joined: Nov 2003
Reputation: 901
I Root For: My Kids & ECU
Location: 523 Miles From ECU

Crappies
Post: #5
 
Dogger Wrote:Wouldn't it have been reasonable to target this place as a potential site of WMD's. We knew it had VMX and other high grade explosives. Why wouldn't have we designated this site and gaurded it immediately. How could we have left this whole site ungaurded but GAURD the ministry of oil on the first day. We gaurded the oil platforms before we went in. If we truly went in for WMD's, why didn't we gaurd this place from Day 1?????
Why do you continue to start new threads about the same crap that you have already discussed in the other threads that you have started?

If you can't get your point across in one thread, don't try it all over again in another.
10-29-2004 01:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread:


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.