Folks are running out of things to complain about!

<a href='http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051117/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/economy' target='_blank'>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051117/ap_on_...o_ec_fi/economy</a>

But that is bad, because when the media runs out of things to make a conspiracy of, they normally turn their attention to the economy and how poorly it is doing, driving down consumer confidence.

Looks like we need another major scandal and/or natural disaster and quick.

blah Wrote:Looks like we need another major scandal and/or natural disaster and quick.

No we already got a scandal with Bush lying to get us to invade Iraq.

The media plans on getting all the mileage of out this they can.

uhmump95 Wrote:No we already got a scandal with Bush lying to get us to invade Iraq.

Are you saying this really happend or that's just what the media has clinged to? If so can you provide some proof of this assertion? Bare in mind that proof means you have to be able to show how Bush took us to war by stating things he knew to be false. That he deliberately didn't tell the truth so he could take us to war.

Also bare in mind that if you have such proof you should call The New York Time immediately since they have been searching for such proof for a couple of years now.

uhmump95 Wrote:

blah Wrote:Looks like we need another major scandal and/or natural disaster and quick.

No we already got a scandal with Bush lying to get us to invade Iraq.

The media plans on getting all the mileage of out this they can.

BINGO!

Ninerfan1 Wrote:Are you saying this really happend or that's just what the media has clinged to? If so can you provide some proof of this assertion? Bare in mind that proof means you have to be able to show how Bush took us to war by stating things he knew to be false. That he deliberately didn't tell the truth so he could take us to war.

Also bare in mind that if you have such proof you should call The New York Time immediately since they have been searching for such proof for a couple of years now.

I made the statement to say this is what the media is currently trying to make the next big issue.

I will state here and now that I believe that Bush wrong to rush to war with the information that he was given, considering there are no WMDs and that the link to Al Queada only seemed to materialize after we invaded Iraq.

uhmump95 Wrote:I made the statement to say this is what the media is currently trying to make the next big issue.

I will state here and now that I believe that Bush wrong to rush to war with the information that he was given, considering there are no WMDs and that the link to Al Queada only seemed to materialize after we invaded Iraq.

Ok, that's what I was hoping.

I think that is a legitimate point of view, though i believe the info he was given justified us going to war. It was only after we invaded that we found no WMD's.

I'm glad to see you're not one of the Bush lied people.