Quote:Why would kentucky come in here and beat us out for Mosby?
Kentucky's recruiting under Brooks certainly appears strange, particularly since for the last two years there have been calls for his head throughout the season, he gets a reprieve for one reason or another, then goes out and quickly recruits players from all over the country--though the overall quality of what he has been getting has been questionable.
This year, Kentucky has been able to keep at least some of the top Kentucky players at home, headed by the No. 1 prospect in the state, Micah Johnson of Ft. Campbell. They're almost finished with their recruiting already (26 commits, some possibly counting against last year's class, and some possibly grayshirt candidates), which is a little unusual, especially for a team with a lot of problems. Why wouldn't you hold a few scholarships open for highly rated players in case you were able to sway them at national signing day? It's not as if the guys they have committed are high-school All-Americans, with the exception of Johnson. But I'm just a fan who really likes to follow recruiting, but has no inside information, only opinions like everybody else.
Perhaps Kentucky's success with Mosby and Foote results from the realization that the only place in Tennessee where they could make recruiting inroads would be in Memphis, where the recruiting is more wide open, and Tennessee doesn't dominate as much as they do in the rest of the state, though they still sign a lot of Memphis players. They probably think it's a lot easier to recruit Memphis than Middle Tennessee, where they run up against Tennessee, Alabama, and Auburn, among others. Another factor in Kentucky's recruiting recently is that they've had to change their approach because of the probation and scholarship reductions.
One interesting thing I have noticed looking over the Kentucky recruiting lists the past couple of years is that they have been bringing in a number of California JC players. Living out West and following the PAC-10 as I do, I can attest that getting California JC players is a fine idea, if you're getting good ones. The depth and quality of JC talent in California is fantastic. Many of these kids have unusual personal stories, and are late bloomers. They go to California JC's from all over the country, too. Jerome Harrison of WSU, who has been named first-team All-American running back by a number of organizations now, came to WSU from Pasadena City College. He was originally from Kalamazoo, Michigan, went to Eastern Michigan for a year but didn't play, ended up in junior college in California, signed with WSU, and eventually become an All-American. Brooks undoubtedly retains his connections in California from his days as the coach at Oregon, where he was instumental in reviving the Oregon program before leaving for a pro job. He had a reputation as a tough, take-no-prisoners recruiter.
Like Brooks, Coach West also does a very good job of recruiting JC players, only he doesn't have to go as far to do it. There are tons of good JC players in Mississippi junior colleges. Probably this year's Memphis recruiting list will contain a number of players from down there, and maybe a few from Kansas, where the JC football is also good. California, Kansas, and Texas are the Big Three of JC fooball west of the Mississippi.
The Memphis coaching staff really does a good job of evaluating these JC players from what I can see from a distance. But you guys know a lot more about the local recruiting than I do. All I know about Memphis high-school football is what I read in the paper and what posters relate on this board. Though they apparently don't have that many scholarhips to offer this year, I'm sure the Tigers will pull in some good recruits.