Three interceptions, 2 completions for 33 yards, and a ZERO quarterback rating.

Put in Griese NOW.

If Griese plays in the playoffs, the Bears have 0 chance at going to the Super Bowl.

You have to stay with Gorssman.

It was interesting listening to Cris Collinsworth at halftime. He said: "Griese would be my starter in the second half. If he plays well, Griese would be my starter in the playoffs."

+1

But Lovie would never do anything that bold!

7 Wrote:If Griese plays in the playoffs, the Bears have 0 chance at going to the Super Bowl.

You have to stay with Gorssman.

Wrong!

Griese CAN get the job done. He's much more consistent than Grossman. He just needs a chance, which Lovie won't give him!

huskiebob Wrote:It was interesting listening to Cris Collinsworth at halftime. He said: "Griese would be my starter in the second half. If he plays well, Griese would be my starter in the playoffs."

+1

But Lovie would never do anything that bold!

Griese is terrible. The Bears would be a bad offense once again if they go to Griese.

As to people who say he takes care of the ball. 7 TDs, 7 INTs with the Bucs last year. He's a BAD quaterback.

Rex is the only option.

I agree wit Sterling Sharpe. When asked if he would start Griese, "No, no, no".

huskiebob Wrote:

7 Wrote:If Griese plays in the playoffs, the Bears have 0 chance at going to the Super Bowl.

You have to stay with Gorssman.

Wrong!

Griese CAN get the job done. He's much more consistent than Grossman. He just needs a chance, which Lovie won't give him!

Yes, he's consitently bad.

7 TDs, 7 INTs last year.

BAD, BAD, BAD

I've seen him play more then all of you.

I trust G, plus I've seen Griese in a few games. He's nothing special.

Packers look like a legit playoff contender tonight. Next year is going to be real fun, especially if Favre comes back.

Good 1st series for Griese.

He played very little last year. You know that!

Career numbers for Griese:

1476-2335 for 16440 yards; 7.04 y/att; 63.2%; 103 TDs; 78 INTs


Career numbers for Grossman:

365-663 for 4463 yards; 6.73 y/att, 55.1%; 27 TDs; 23 INTs


Now what were you saying?!!

Ouch. I didn't even know da Bears were playing. This looks pretty ugly. I think I may sytick with Miami/Nevada.

7 Wrote:Good 1st series for Griese.

I didn't hear you getting on Nicholson's case when he struggled after finally getting some meaningful time in the TENTH game of the season!

Same thing here!

huskiebob Wrote:He played very little last year. You know that!

Career numbers for Griese:

1476-2335 for 16440 yards; 7.04 y/att; 63.2%; 103 TDs; 78 INTs


Career numbers for Grossman:

365-663 for 4463 yards; 6.73 y/att, 55.1%; 27 TDs; 23 INTs


Now what were you saying?!!

He was our started for the first 6 games of the season (or something like that). He had plenty of time to show wat he can do. He'll serve up at least 1 pick 6 in the first playoff game.

You don't think there is a reaon that Griese has bounced around? You don't think there is a reason we cut him and took a cap hit?

Grossman has played like 20 games, young QBs struggle. Of course Griese's numbers look better.

You can argue for him all you want, but I gurantee you the Bears WILL NOT go to the SUper Bowl with him as their QB.

7 Wrote:

huskiebob Wrote:He played very little last year. You know that!

Career numbers for Griese:

1476-2335 for 16440 yards; 7.04 y/att; 63.2%; 103 TDs; 78 INTs


Career numbers for Grossman:

365-663 for 4463 yards; 6.73 y/att, 55.1%; 27 TDs; 23 INTs


Now what were you saying?!!

He was our started for the first 6 games of the season (or something like that). He had plenty of time to show wat he can do. He'll serve up at least 1 pick 6 in the first playoff game.

You don't think there is a reaon that Griese has bounced around? You don't think there is a reason we cut him and took a cap hit?

Grossman has played like 20 games, young QBs struggle. Of course Griese's numbers look better.

You can argue for him all you want, but I gurantee you the Bears WILL NOT go to the SUper Bowl with him as their QB.

"Our Starter"? "We cut him"?

Oh, you must be talking about Tampa Bay, the team that's sitting at home during the playoffs! I thought cutting Griese would fix all your problems!

lmfao

huskiebob Wrote:

7 Wrote:

huskiebob Wrote:He played very little last year. You know that!

Career numbers for Griese:

1476-2335 for 16440 yards; 7.04 y/att; 63.2%; 103 TDs; 78 INTs


Career numbers for Grossman:

365-663 for 4463 yards; 6.73 y/att, 55.1%; 27 TDs; 23 INTs


Now what were you saying?!!

He was our started for the first 6 games of the season (or something like that). He had plenty of time to show wat he can do. He'll serve up at least 1 pick 6 in the first playoff game.

You don't think there is a reaon that Griese has bounced around? You don't think there is a reason we cut him and took a cap hit?

Grossman has played like 20 games, young QBs struggle. Of course Griese's numbers look better.

You can argue for him all you want, but I gurantee you the Bears WILL NOT go to the SUper Bowl with him as their QB.

"Our Starter"? "We cut him"?

Oh, you must be talking about Tampa Bay, the team that's sitting at home during the playoffs! I thought cutting Griese would fix all your problems!

lmfao

They have the #4 pick while the Bears are likely going one and out.

HAWK!!!!!!!!!!!!!

huskiebob Wrote:

7 Wrote:

huskiebob Wrote:He played very little last year. You know that!

Career numbers for Griese:

1476-2335 for 16440 yards; 7.04 y/att; 63.2%; 103 TDs; 78 INTs


Career numbers for Grossman:

365-663 for 4463 yards; 6.73 y/att, 55.1%; 27 TDs; 23 INTs


Now what were you saying?!!

He was our started for the first 6 games of the season (or something like that). He had plenty of time to show wat he can do. He'll serve up at least 1 pick 6 in the first playoff game.

You don't think there is a reaon that Griese has bounced around? You don't think there is a reason we cut him and took a cap hit?

Grossman has played like 20 games, young QBs struggle. Of course Griese's numbers look better.

You can argue for him all you want, but I gurantee you the Bears WILL NOT go to the SUper Bowl with him as their QB.

"Our Starter"? "We cut him"?

Oh, you must be talking about Tampa Bay, the team that's sitting at home during the playoffs! I thought cutting Griese would fix all your problems!

lmfao

Oh my God.

You do realize our starting QB lost his spleen in week 3?

FYI, we went to the playoffs last year after he got hurt.


OH LOOK AT THE THROW BY GRIESE!!!
lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao

You want Orton now?

Oh and another thing, Devin Hester is THE most overrated player in the game.

7 Wrote:

huskiebob Wrote:

7 Wrote:

huskiebob Wrote:He played very little last year. You know that!

Career numbers for Griese:

1476-2335 for 16440 yards; 7.04 y/att; 63.2%; 103 TDs; 78 INTs


Career numbers for Grossman:

365-663 for 4463 yards; 6.73 y/att, 55.1%; 27 TDs; 23 INTs


Now what were you saying?!!

He was our started for the first 6 games of the season (or something like that). He had plenty of time to show wat he can do. He'll serve up at least 1 pick 6 in the first playoff game.

You don't think there is a reaon that Griese has bounced around? You don't think there is a reason we cut him and took a cap hit?

Grossman has played like 20 games, young QBs struggle. Of course Griese's numbers look better.

You can argue for him all you want, but I gurantee you the Bears WILL NOT go to the SUper Bowl with him as their QB.

"Our Starter"? "We cut him"?

Oh, you must be talking about Tampa Bay, the team that's sitting at home during the playoffs! I thought cutting Griese would fix all your problems!

lmfao

Oh my God.

You do realize our starting QB lost his spleen in week 3?

FYI, we went to the playoffs last year after he got hurt.


OH LOOK AT THE THROW BY GRIESE!!!
lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao

You want Orton now?

Remember what happened with Dan when he finally played against Toledo? Regardless of how much you personally dislike him, don't you think Griese deserves more of a chance?

huskiebob Wrote:

7 Wrote:

huskiebob Wrote:

7 Wrote:

huskiebob Wrote:He played very little last year. You know that!

Career numbers for Griese:

1476-2335 for 16440 yards; 7.04 y/att; 63.2%; 103 TDs; 78 INTs


Career numbers for Grossman:

365-663 for 4463 yards; 6.73 y/att, 55.1%; 27 TDs; 23 INTs


Now what were you saying?!!

He was our started for the first 6 games of the season (or something like that). He had plenty of time to show wat he can do. He'll serve up at least 1 pick 6 in the first playoff game.

You don't think there is a reaon that Griese has bounced around? You don't think there is a reason we cut him and took a cap hit?

Grossman has played like 20 games, young QBs struggle. Of course Griese's numbers look better.

You can argue for him all you want, but I gurantee you the Bears WILL NOT go to the SUper Bowl with him as their QB.

"Our Starter"? "We cut him"?

Oh, you must be talking about Tampa Bay, the team that's sitting at home during the playoffs! I thought cutting Griese would fix all your problems!

lmfao

Oh my God.

You do realize our starting QB lost his spleen in week 3?

FYI, we went to the playoffs last year after he got hurt.


OH LOOK AT THE THROW BY GRIESE!!!
lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao

You want Orton now?

Remember what happened with Dan when he finally played against Toledo? Regardless of how much you personally dislike him, don't you think Griese deserves more of a chance?

Griese deserves 0 chance. He is bad at football. Why does he deserve a chance when I have seen him play in many games already? The Broncos, Dolphins, and Bucs all agree with me.

7 Wrote:Griese deserves 0 chance. He is bad at football. Why does he deserve a chance when I have seen him play in many games already? The Broncos, Dolphins, and Bucs all agree with me.

That's kind of an arrogant statement on your part, don't you think? He's hardly "bad at football" and his career numbers prove it!

Griese, while not a star QB, is a solid player that many NFL teams would love to have and you know it!

3-9. 27 yards, 1 INT

About 3 more could have been picked


Yeah, Griese is awesome.