Falconfreak90
All American
Posts: 2,834
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
|
<a href='http://espn.go.com/ncf/news/2003/0721/1583800.html' target='_blank'>http://espn.go.com/ncf/news/2003/0721/1583800.html</a>
At least Tulane's prez is making an effort to get change.
|
|
07-22-2003 01:52 PM |
|
MylesKnight
1st String
Posts: 1,046
Joined: Jul 2002
Reputation: 29
I Root For: UCF
Location: Neptune Beach
|
Falconfreak90 Wrote:<a href='http://espn.go.com/ncf/news/2003/0721/1583800.html' target='_blank'>http://espn.go.com/ncf/news/2003/0721/1583800.html</a>
At least Tulane's prez is making an effort to get change.
All Non-"Cartel" Member Schools need to form some sort of alliance and go after the BCS and it's members. This is a blatant antitrust issue and it will force the "Cartel" Members hand. Unfortunately one of the outcomes could very well end up being a split altogether by the current BCS Schools from the rest of Division I-A.
Unfortunately this alliance I speak of more than likely will never be. Too many schools out there looking out only for themselves... See Louisville as example #1.
|
|
07-22-2003 02:01 PM |
|
DrTorch
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:
|
MylesKnight Wrote:All Non-"Cartel" Member Schools need to form some sort of alliance and go after the BCS and it's members. This is a blatant antitrust issue and it will force the "Cartel" Members hand. Unfortunately one of the outcomes could very well end up being a split altogether by the current BCS Schools from the rest of Division I-A.
Unfortunately this alliance I speak of more than likely will never be. Too many schools out there looking out only for themselves... See Louisville as example #1.
I agree, and have advocated this for years.
In fact that's why I like the regional conferences, makes it simpler to host a playoff.
But, if this action did result in a split, the BCS group would still be open to anti-trust litigation if they did decide to go w/ a playoff. "Hey, we like the idea now that you guys are gone," won't fly. At least it shouldn't. No one can predict the outcome of a lawsuit, but I but it would be heard.
|
|
07-22-2003 03:12 PM |
|
DrTorch
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:
|
MylesKnight Wrote:All Non-"Cartel" Member Schools need to form some sort of alliance and go after the BCS and it's members.
<a href='http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/news?slug=ap-bcsfuture&prov=ap&type=lgns' target='_blank'>May be finally happening!!</a>
|
|
07-23-2003 07:39 AM |
|
HuronDave
Heisman
Posts: 5,772
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation: 57
I Root For: The MAC
Location:
|
``Let's not ask about them giving money to us,'' said Bill Greiner, the president of Buffalo. ``They want to drive people out of competition at the Division I-A level unless we come up to some standard they decide to set in terms of expenditures and attendance. That is plain flat-out wrong.''
Well stated.
|
|
07-23-2003 08:07 AM |
|
rocketfootball
Legend
Posts: 26,853
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 18
I Root For: Toledo
Location:
|
Let's hope that all the MAC school presidents were part of those 44 presidents that created this coalition. We don't need the MAC to sit back and do nothing.
|
|
07-23-2003 08:17 AM |
|
klingon288
Special Teams
Posts: 959
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 0
I Root For: Buffalo
Location:
|
Quote: "I'm skeptical a national champion could be determined in a playoff without infringing on a student athlete's welfare," said Penn State president Graham Spanier, a member of the committee.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
I wonder if he can really say that with a straight face?
Somehow they manage to establish national champions at every other level of college footbal ON THE FIELD, instead of by poll or by an artificial exclusionary BCS system.
|
|
07-27-2003 11:56 AM |
|
FlashFan
Heisman
Posts: 8,460
Joined: Feb 2003
Reputation: 38
I Root For: Kent State
Location:
|
<a href='http://coalition.tulane.edu/members_institutions.shtml' target='_blank'>http://coalition.tulane.edu/members_institutions.shtml</a>
Quote:Let's hope that all the MAC school presidents were part of those 44 presidents that created this coalition. We don't need the MAC to sit back and do nothing.
Looks to me like all MAC school presidents are in the Tulane camp, except Akron and Eastern Michigan. What's up wiith them?
|
|
07-27-2003 06:04 PM |
|
Falconfreak90
All American
Posts: 2,834
Joined: May 2002
Reputation: 3
I Root For:
Location:
|
DrTorch Wrote:MylesKnight Wrote:All Non-"Cartel" Member Schools need to form some sort of alliance and go after the BCS and it's members.
<a href='http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/news?slug=ap-bcsfuture&prov=ap&type=lgns' target='_blank'>May be finally happening!!</a>
The real reason the BCS doesn't want the 5 other 1-A conf around...
Tulane president Scott Cowen convened a teleconference of 44 presidents from non-BCS schools and created a Presidential Coalition for Athletic Reform. The goals of the coalition are to improve access for all teams to postseason football, reduce the financial requirements for remaining in Division I-A and raise academic requirements in college athletics.
Raising academic requirements in college athletics. The MAC has always had strong requirements to play...the big boys slide on this rule quite often.
|
|
07-27-2003 06:29 PM |
|
Herd Fan 4-Life
Heisman
Posts: 5,380
Joined: Jul 2002
Reputation: 115
I Root For: Marshall
Location: Huntington, WV
|
FlashFan Wrote:Looks to me like all MAC school presidents are in the Tulane camp, except Akron and Eastern Michigan. What's up wiith them?
Good question. HuronDave?
|
|
07-27-2003 10:40 PM |
|