I don't who it was. 36 innings without giving up a run is incredible.

Observer Wrote:

Quote:Earlier this year our pitchers threw 24 consecutive innings against Louisiana -Lafayette, Alabama, and LSU without a run ...

The only common opponent Tulane and USM have in that group is LSU, and Tulane defeated them.

And 24 innings in a row isn't even three total games, let alone MORE than four games.

For the math inept (i.e. the USM people I have on ignore), 9 times 3 is 27, which is greater than 24. Two shutouts is not an accomplishment, which is why they shouldn't be bragging. Four consecutive, however, is.

But there's a reason that I put retards on ignore.

GANG_GREEN Wrote:

In The Know Wrote:

GANG_GREEN Wrote:The fact that they were estatic to be #1 a month into the season says alot.

Beating your chests over beating an 0-15 team says a lot more.

And your obsession with Tulane continues.

It's been bugging him ever since he got that rejection letter years ago.

BTW, you'll note how that coward ran far away from another thread...

In The Know Wrote:

FW_ Wrote:I'd put UNO about equal to LSU.

lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao

Do you follow college baseball? LSU is mediocre at best this year having lost a home series to Lipscomb and were also routed by Stetson in a series. They probably won't make the SEC tourney for the 2nd straight year and won't make the regionals again this year. UNO is much improved this year.

GANG_GREEN Wrote:

In The Know Wrote:

GANG_GREEN Wrote:The fact that they were estatic to be #1 a month into the season says alot.

Beating your chests over beating an 0-15 team says a lot more.

And your obsession with Tulane continues.

I believe you posted about USM FIRST, junior.

Sophandros Wrote:

GANG_GREEN Wrote:

In The Know Wrote:

GANG_GREEN Wrote:The fact that they were estatic to be #1 a month into the season says alot.

Beating your chests over beating an 0-15 team says a lot more.

And your obsession with Tulane continues.

It's been bugging him ever since he got that rejection letter years ago.

BTW, you'll note how that coward ran far away from another thread...

The real coward is the one that refuses to debate me directly, and has to address my posts in responses to OTHER posters. But hey, I can understand you not wanting a piece of me after I've destroyed you so many times. lmfao lmfao lmfao

FW_ Wrote:

In The Know Wrote:

FW_ Wrote:I'd put UNO about equal to LSU.

lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao lmfao

Do you follow college baseball? LSU is mediocre at best this year having lost a home series to Lipscomb and were also routed by Stetson in a series. They probably won't make the SEC tourney for the 2nd straight year and won't make the regionals again this year. UNO is much improved this year.

And how many national titles has UNO won?

Are you serious? LSU won their last national title in 2000. That's 7 years ago. How does LSU winning a national title in 2000 have ANYTHING to do with 2007? This should be good.

FW_ Wrote:Are you serious? LSU won their last national title in 2000. That's 7 years ago. How does LSU winning a national title in 2000 have ANYTHING to do with 2007? This should be good.

Why are you dodging the question?

UNO has won zero titles. LSU has won 5. Neither has anything to do with either team's performance in 2007.

In The Know Wrote:

FW_ Wrote:Are you serious? LSU won their last national title in 2000. That's 7 years ago. How does LSU winning a national title in 2000 have ANYTHING to do with 2007? This should be good.

Why are you dodging the question?

Why did you dodge my question for 3 days?

Seriously though, how does UNO not having any national championships validate anything that is happening this season? That is like saying UNO is a better team than USM because they have more College World Series apperances than USM does.

FW_ Wrote:Are you serious? LSU won their last national title in 2000. That's 7 years ago. How does LSU winning a national title in 2000 have ANYTHING to do with 2007? This should be good.

Your talking to the fecktard who thinks that an NIT title in 1987 is relevant today.

Just sayin'.

GANG_GREEN Wrote:

In The Know Wrote:

FW_ Wrote:Are you serious? LSU won their last national title in 2000. That's 7 years ago. How does LSU winning a national title in 2000 have ANYTHING to do with 2007? This should be good.

Why are you dodging the question?

Why did you dodge my question for 3 days?

Seriously though, how does UNO not having any national championships validate anything that is happening this season? That is like saying UNO is a better team than USM because they have more College World Series apperances than USM does.

Try a week. There is a thread from exacly a week ago where you have the last post.

This guy is a waste of flesh. We should all follow my example and put him on ignore.

FW_ Wrote:UNO has won zero titles. LSU has won 5. Neither has anything to do with either team's performance in 2007.

It means LSU has a better program. I understand that you hate LSU and are probably embarrassed by a near loss to UNO, but to compare LSU to 9-11 UNO is asinine.

GANG_GREEN Wrote:

In The Know Wrote:

FW_ Wrote:Are you serious? LSU won their last national title in 2000. That's 7 years ago. How does LSU winning a national title in 2000 have ANYTHING to do with 2007? This should be good.

Why are you dodging the question?

Why did you dodge my question for 3 days?

Seriously though, how does UNO not having any national championships validate anything that is happening this season? That is like saying UNO is a better team than USM because they have more College World Series apperances than USM does.

Haven't dodged any questions. Not my fault if you can't read. I gave debate ending facts that you could never dispute. Don't try to bring it up again, because you lost the debate long ago. Honestly, you are even mentally weaker than Sophie, and that's saying A LOT!!!

In The Know Wrote:

FW_ Wrote:Are you serious? LSU won their last national title in 2000. That's 7 years ago. How does LSU winning a national title in 2000 have ANYTHING to do with 2007? This should be good.

Why are you dodging the question?

Because the question is meaningless to the teams today. Sure, MANY teams who recently won National Championships are still very good, but not all of them... and there are MANY good teams this year who have never won NCs.

You have plenty to argue about in terms of whether or not shutting out an 0-15 team is significant... extending the argument to whether UNO <> LSU is pointless.

Personally, I think shut-outs are as much about timing as about pitching. Wind blowing out, a pop-fly is an HR... Wind blowing in, a deep blast is just another fly ball out. Sienna apparently isn't very good, while Tulane apparently is at least solid.... I'd be more impressed by your taking 2 of 3 from a top 10 team team than shutting out an 0-15 team. As for Sienna's 10 runs in 3 games against Fla State, if they lost each game by less than 2 runs, that is meaningful... If they were down 7-0 late in each game and got 3 runs against a mop-up pitcher trying to work his way into the rotation, I'm not impressed. Top teams are working on more than 'streaks" at this time of the year.

Sophandros Wrote:We should all follow my example and put him on ignore.

You mean they should all run like cowards, read every word I post, and attempt to debate me by responding to someone else? If someone snips off their testicles, then they'll probably do that just like you Sophie. lmfao

O really? Well where did you post the answers then? I went back and counted over 15 different posts where I asked for the number of NCAA apperances for USM in BBall. Also how many have they won in the tournament all-time? All you do is come back with the same lame comeback. "USM's program is better than Tulane's." You sound like a little 4th grader in an argument about whos father would win in a fight.

If you are to embarrassed to answer then just say so. Otherwise grow a pair and answer it.

First of all UNO is not 9-11, they are 13-9, same record as LSU. Of course LSU has a better program than UNO but as you well know (or at least would if you had half a brain) that has nothing to do with this year. LSU was defending national champs in 2000, Tulane has never won a NC. Who won the 2001 Super Regional between Tulane and LSU? LSU right? Because they had 5 NC's? Nope, Tulane with their ZERO national titles.

In The Know Wrote:Haven't dodged any questions. Not my fault if you can't read. I gave debate ending facts that you could never dispute. Don't try to bring it up again, because you lost the debate long ago. Honestly, you are even mentally weaker than Sophie, and that's saying A LOT!!!

WOW, please go back and find that debate and repost it here. That is the funniest thing I've heard on this board since I started reading it. Your debate consist of "USM is better than Tulane", "We won an NIT Championship and you didn't" and "We will go places that Tulane never has." That is a debate?

I already posted the numbers for you.

NCAA apperances: Tulane > USM
NCAA wins: Tulane > USM
Head-to-head: Tulane > USM
NIT championship: Tulane < USM

That leads you to believe USM has a better program than Tulane?

Please tell me you didn't graduate college?