Quote:Another stunning election controversy has erupted in Georgia after officials discovered that a missing memory card containing hundreds of unreported Election Day votes had completely reversed the apparent outcome of a critical State House race.

Republican State Rep. Gerald Greene, who appeared headed for defeat against Democrat Harry James in Georgia’s House District 154, is now leading after election officials discovered that results from a memory card in Seminole County had never been uploaded, WCTV reported.

The reversal was extraordinary.

Greene had been trailing James by just 58 votes following Tuesday’s midterm elections.

But after the missing results were added, the Republican incumbent surged into the lead by 262 votes, a stunning 320-vote swing that could determine control of a crucial seat in the Georgia Legislature.

And the discovery was no minor bookkeeping error.

According to an official statement released Friday by RINO Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, election officials identified a discrepancy of approximately 388 voters who had checked in at polling locations but whose ballots were not reflected in the county’s reported vote totals.

How does an entire memory card containing hundreds of votes fail to make it into the election results in a race this close?

That is now the subject of an official state investigation.

“Georgia’s election safeguards are designed to identify discrepancies, and that is exactly what these guardrails did,” said Secretary Raffensperger.

“Our office identified a significant discrepancy, alerted county officials, and uncovered a failure to properly upload election results. This oversight didn’t just affect the numbers – it changed who was leading an election. That is unacceptable, and we intend to find out exactly how it happened.”

“Every vote matters, and in a close election, even a relatively small number of unreported ballots can change the outcome,” Raffensperger added.

County election officials have until Monday, November 9, to certify their results.

According to AJC, if the results hold, the dramatic reversal could save one of the most vulnerable Republican incumbents in the Georgia Legislature, leaving Democrats with just 92 seats in the 180-member House, barely above the 91-seat threshold needed to secure a majority.

The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively on previous election-counting irregularities in Georgia, including incidents involving memory cards and votes initially omitted from election totals.

During the 2020 presidential election recount, officials in Floyd County discovered approximately 2,600 votes that had not been included in the original count.

State officials initially attributed the problem to an election worker’s failure to upload a memory card.

In August 2022, The Gateway Pundit’s Brian Lupo reported on missing Election Day log files and conflicting accounts of what caused the Floyd County discrepancy.

Link

I bet there’s a lot more of this they never discover

(11-07-2026 10:56 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I bet there’s a lot more of this they never discover

Memory cards. It's 2026 and we have election results on frickin thumbdrives that someone puts in their pocket and drops off somewhere. Third world countries have better election criteria than we do.

We don't have better election criteria b/c too many people in charge of that don't want it.

Nah not cheating. Where is Aggie boy.

So a memory card is found that swings the vote to republicans. I'm just curious if a memory card was found that happened to swing the vote to dems I'm sure most on this board would be pretty upset and consider that evidence of voter fraud. So does this only go in one direction? Only voter fraud if it happens to republicans?

Of course not

(11-07-2026 12:01 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-07-2026 10:56 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I bet there’s a lot more of this they never discover

Memory cards. It's 2026 and we have election results on frickin thumbdrives that someone puts in their pocket and drops off somewhere. Third world countries have better election criteria than we do.

What better solution do you propose? They can't be connected to the internet otherwise they'd be open to hackers. As insane as it sounds, air-gapped machines with memory cards is a pretty damn good method. The only problem is it has to involve humans transporting the data.

(Yesterday 09:27 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(11-07-2026 12:01 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-07-2026 10:56 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I bet there’s a lot more of this they never discover

Memory cards. It's 2026 and we have election results on frickin thumbdrives that someone puts in their pocket and drops off somewhere. Third world countries have better election criteria than we do.

What better solution do you propose? They can't be connected to the internet otherwise they'd be open to hackers. As insane as it sounds, air-gapped machines with memory cards is a pretty damn good method. The only problem is it has to involve humans transporting the data.

Paper ballots

(Yesterday 09:33 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:27 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(11-07-2026 12:01 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-07-2026 10:56 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I bet there’s a lot more of this they never discover

Memory cards. It's 2026 and we have election results on frickin thumbdrives that someone puts in their pocket and drops off somewhere. Third world countries have better election criteria than we do.

What better solution do you propose? They can't be connected to the internet otherwise they'd be open to hackers. As insane as it sounds, air-gapped machines with memory cards is a pretty damn good method. The only problem is it has to involve humans transporting the data.

Paper ballots

We have paper ballots. You vote. They print who you voted for, but do a QR code with the detail (which obviously humans can't read) and then you enter them into a machine which scans them.

(Yesterday 05:23 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Nah not cheating. Where is Aggie boy.

You rang?

Republican Secretary of State. Republican Governor. Republican President. Or was he actually a secret Democrat all this time and just never told anybody?

In fact, Republicans have had a trifecta in Georgia every year since 2005. House. Senate. Governor.

The great thing about stupid election conspiracy theories is that there's always just enough actual incompetence out there that to make it somewhat believable. But at least make sure that it's the Democrats making the mistakes if you're going to say that they're cheating, can't you?

(Yesterday 09:47 PM)bryanw1995 Wrote:  

(Yesterday 05:23 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Nah not cheating. Where is Aggie boy.

You rang?

Republican Secretary of State. Republican Governor. Republican President. Or was he actually a secret Democrat all this time and just never told anybody?

In fact, Republicans have had a trifecta in Georgia every year since 2005. House. Senate. Governor.

The great thing about stupid election conspiracy theories is that there's always just enough actual incompetence out there that to make it somewhat believable. But at least make sure that it's the Democrats making the mistakes if you're going to say that they're cheating, can't you?

Stupid comment. Local officials control the voting. Atlanta and Fulton County are overwhelmingly Democratic. That's where the biggest issues were.

Sec. of State Raffensberger seems to be a Democrat who was just running as a Republican because Republicans held all the statewide offices. His chief assistant, Sterling, was a hard core progressive Democrat who gave in to the Democrats on every lawsuit to eliminate election security in the state.

(Yesterday 09:42 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:33 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:27 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(11-07-2026 12:01 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(11-07-2026 10:56 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I bet there’s a lot more of this they never discover

Memory cards. It's 2026 and we have election results on frickin thumbdrives that someone puts in their pocket and drops off somewhere. Third world countries have better election criteria than we do.

What better solution do you propose? They can't be connected to the internet otherwise they'd be open to hackers. As insane as it sounds, air-gapped machines with memory cards is a pretty damn good method. The only problem is it has to involve humans transporting the data.

Paper ballots

We have paper ballots. You vote. They print who you voted for, but do a QR code with the detail (which obviously humans can't read) and then you enter them into a machine which scans them.

I hate being the Debbie Downer, but what is the difference between a human carrying a thumb drive and a human carrying a stack of QR codes? Hell, even plain old paper ballots someone could raise the complaint that the human tabulators are cheating.

The problem isn't the technology. The problem is the fixation that if my side loses, it means the other side cheated.

Both sides cheat. Just ask bill dazzle.

(Yesterday 09:53 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:42 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:33 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:27 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(11-07-2026 12:01 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Memory cards. It's 2026 and we have election results on frickin thumbdrives that someone puts in their pocket and drops off somewhere. Third world countries have better election criteria than we do.

What better solution do you propose? They can't be connected to the internet otherwise they'd be open to hackers. As insane as it sounds, air-gapped machines with memory cards is a pretty damn good method. The only problem is it has to involve humans transporting the data.

Paper ballots

We have paper ballots. You vote. They print who you voted for, but do a QR code with the detail (which obviously humans can't read) and then you enter them into a machine which scans them.

I hate being the Debbie Downer, but what is the difference between a human carrying a thumb drive and a human carrying a stack of QR codes? Hell, even plain old paper ballots someone could raise the complaint that the human tabulators are cheating.

The problem isn't the technology. The problem is the fixation that if my side loses, it means the other side cheated.

The voter feeds the sheet into the machine and you wait until the number of votes goes up on the machine. The thumb drive has the results from those machines.

Its pretty hard to miss loading a thumb drive. Procedures are just awful. Until recently in Georgia you had to fill out a paper form with all the information that was already on your voter registration card. Georgia is just really behind.

(Yesterday 11:05 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:53 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:42 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:33 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:27 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  What better solution do you propose? They can't be connected to the internet otherwise they'd be open to hackers. As insane as it sounds, air-gapped machines with memory cards is a pretty damn good method. The only problem is it has to involve humans transporting the data.

Paper ballots

We have paper ballots. You vote. They print who you voted for, but do a QR code with the detail (which obviously humans can't read) and then you enter them into a machine which scans them.

I hate being the Debbie Downer, but what is the difference between a human carrying a thumb drive and a human carrying a stack of QR codes? Hell, even plain old paper ballots someone could raise the complaint that the human tabulators are cheating.

The problem isn't the technology. The problem is the fixation that if my side loses, it means the other side cheated.

The voter feeds the sheet into the machine and you wait until the number of votes goes up on the machine. The thumb drive has the results from those machines.

Its pretty hard to miss loading a thumb drive. Procedures are just awful. Until recently in Georgia you had to fill out a paper form with all the information that was already on your voter registration card. Georgia is just really behind.

The thumb drive goes into a bankers bag with a printed receipt locked and escorted by a deputy to the courthouse, fed into a central machine, encrypted and sent to the state. Elections are certified when the reciept and thumb drive are audited and confirmed.

Finding a thumb drive is utter bullshite cheating and it should be thrown out regardless of who it favors.

Its always sub 80 filth and always in their favor

They cheat. Its that simple

(Yesterday 11:17 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(Yesterday 11:05 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:53 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:42 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:33 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Paper ballots

We have paper ballots. You vote. They print who you voted for, but do a QR code with the detail (which obviously humans can't read) and then you enter them into a machine which scans them.

I hate being the Debbie Downer, but what is the difference between a human carrying a thumb drive and a human carrying a stack of QR codes? Hell, even plain old paper ballots someone could raise the complaint that the human tabulators are cheating.

The problem isn't the technology. The problem is the fixation that if my side loses, it means the other side cheated.

The voter feeds the sheet into the machine and you wait until the number of votes goes up on the machine. The thumb drive has the results from those machines.

Its pretty hard to miss loading a thumb drive. Procedures are just awful. Until recently in Georgia you had to fill out a paper form with all the information that was already on your voter registration card. Georgia is just really behind.

The thumb drive goes into a bankers bag with a printed receipt locked and escorted by a deputy to the courthouse, fed into a central machine, encrypted and sent to the state. Elections are certified when the reciept and thumb drive are audited and confirmed.

Finding a thumb drive is utter bullshite cheating and it should be thrown out regardless of who it favors.

Its always sub 80 filth and always in their favor

They cheat. Its that simple

It's not always in their favor. The thumb drive with the extra votes gave the win to the republican. So I'm guessing you think now the thumb drive should be thrown out and the democrats be given the win?

(Yesterday 08:12 PM)Eagleyed Wrote:  So a memory card is found that swings the vote to republicans. I'm just curious if a memory card was found that happened to swing the vote to dems I'm sure most on this board would be pretty upset and consider that evidence of voter fraud. So does this only go in one direction? Only voter fraud if it happens to republicans?

It wouldn't have made the news because it is so regular. I remember when Wisconsin found a box of ballots in the back of somebody's car to get that idiot from SNL a Senator's spot. Just so happened they were all for him.

(Yesterday 11:45 PM)Eagleyed Wrote:  

(Yesterday 11:17 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(Yesterday 11:05 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:53 PM)bobdizole Wrote:  

(Yesterday 09:42 PM)bullet Wrote:  We have paper ballots. You vote. They print who you voted for, but do a QR code with the detail (which obviously humans can't read) and then you enter them into a machine which scans them.

I hate being the Debbie Downer, but what is the difference between a human carrying a thumb drive and a human carrying a stack of QR codes? Hell, even plain old paper ballots someone could raise the complaint that the human tabulators are cheating.

The problem isn't the technology. The problem is the fixation that if my side loses, it means the other side cheated.

The voter feeds the sheet into the machine and you wait until the number of votes goes up on the machine. The thumb drive has the results from those machines.

Its pretty hard to miss loading a thumb drive. Procedures are just awful. Until recently in Georgia you had to fill out a paper form with all the information that was already on your voter registration card. Georgia is just really behind.

The thumb drive goes into a bankers bag with a printed receipt locked and escorted by a deputy to the courthouse, fed into a central machine, encrypted and sent to the state. Elections are certified when the reciept and thumb drive are audited and confirmed.

Finding a thumb drive is utter bullshite cheating and it should be thrown out regardless of who it favors.

Its always sub 80 filth and always in their favor

They cheat. Its that simple

It's not always in their favor. The thumb drive with the extra votes gave the win to the republican. So I'm guessing you think now the thumb drive should be thrown out and the democrats be given the win?

Yes. We are not the same