Of course "Decoy Dan" disappeared.

I don’t know if this is true or not.

(11-01-2026 04:39 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I don’t know if this is true or not.

It is. She basically said that you are not allowed to prevent fraud.

So the argument is Republican voters cannot tell the difference between the two Dans on this ballot:

https://www.elections.alaska.gov/electio...D1-JD1.pdf

(11-01-2026 05:25 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  So the argument is Republican voters cannot tell the difference between the two Dans on this ballot:

https://www.elections.alaska.gov/electio...D1-JD1.pdf

That is correct. How many seniors who need help in the booth will just say Dan Sullivan and the worker selects Dan Sullivan. It would not take many to throw off this craptastic rank choice voting.

(11-01-2026 05:39 PM)UofMTigerTim Wrote:  

(11-01-2026 05:25 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  So the argument is Republican voters cannot tell the difference between the two Dans on this ballot:

https://www.elections.alaska.gov/electio...D1-JD1.pdf

That is correct. How many seniors who need help in the booth will just say Dan Sullivan and the worker selects Dan Sullivan. It would not take many to throw off this craptastic rank choice voting.

Those seniors are also able to choose their own assistants at any point in the election process. It is about making the right choices.

(11-01-2026 05:51 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(11-01-2026 05:39 PM)UofMTigerTim Wrote:  

(11-01-2026 05:25 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  So the argument is Republican voters cannot tell the difference between the two Dans on this ballot:

https://www.elections.alaska.gov/electio...D1-JD1.pdf

That is correct. How many seniors who need help in the booth will just say Dan Sullivan and the worker selects Dan Sullivan. It would not take many to throw off this craptastic rank choice voting.

Those seniors are also able to choose their own assistants at any point in the election process. It is about making the right choices.

But officials should not be trying to confuse matters in an attempt to help themselves. That's about making the right choices, as well.

Should we not expect that of our elected reps, wannabes and political parties?

Only if they are Republicans

(11-01-2026 06:52 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-01-2026 05:51 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(11-01-2026 05:39 PM)UofMTigerTim Wrote:  

(11-01-2026 05:25 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  So the argument is Republican voters cannot tell the difference between the two Dans on this ballot:

https://www.elections.alaska.gov/electio...D1-JD1.pdf

That is correct. How many seniors who need help in the booth will just say Dan Sullivan and the worker selects Dan Sullivan. It would not take many to throw off this craptastic rank choice voting.

Those seniors are also able to choose their own assistants at any point in the election process. It is about making the right choices.

But officials should not be trying to confuse matters in an attempt to help themselves. That's about making the right choices, as well.

Should we not expect that of our elected reps, wannabes and political parties?

I agree with you but you are trying to argue that election workers would only mess up or intentionally mark the wrong Dan in the Dems favor. It the same argument for pretty much everything posted here.

I trust poll workers. For some, they only trust when it suits their narrative.

Should we go back and look at the threads about requiring voter ID and when people said it would disproportionately affect senior voters?

Seniors have IDs. Democrats say Blacks are too stupid to have them.

(11-01-2026 07:42 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Seniors have IDs. Democrats say Blacks are too stupid to have them.

Bingo. And women. Don't forget women. It's like they think these people have the IQ of 3. (Really, I think they all think all of us have an IQ of 3.)

(11-01-2026 07:20 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(11-01-2026 06:52 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-01-2026 05:51 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(11-01-2026 05:39 PM)UofMTigerTim Wrote:  

(11-01-2026 05:25 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  So the argument is Republican voters cannot tell the difference between the two Dans on this ballot:

https://www.elections.alaska.gov/electio...D1-JD1.pdf

That is correct. How many seniors who need help in the booth will just say Dan Sullivan and the worker selects Dan Sullivan. It would not take many to throw off this craptastic rank choice voting.

Those seniors are also able to choose their own assistants at any point in the election process. It is about making the right choices.

But officials should not be trying to confuse matters in an attempt to help themselves. That's about making the right choices, as well.

Should we not expect that of our elected reps, wannabes and political parties?

I agree with you but you are trying to argue that election workers would only mess up or intentionally mark the wrong Dan in the Dems favor. It the same argument for pretty much everything posted here.

I trust poll workers. For some, they only trust when it suits their narrative.

Should we go back and look at the threads about requiring voter ID and when people said it would disproportionately affect senior voters?

Say wut? That's not what I'm arguing at all. I'm assuming the election workers are honest, and voters are marking the wrong Dan b/c that's what the scam was, to confuse them by putting another Dan Sullivan on the ballot.

By "officials," I meant the Democrat party, not the election workers.

Seems pretty simple to me. Has not a damn thing to do with election workers. I'm talking about the people who actually got the name on the ballot. The Democrat party officials. Get it now?

Of course he doesn’t get it

Horses Ass believes the democriminals did this for chits and giggles. No foul. They were just having some fun. Right?