I was just asking for you to name me one.single.honest politician. Just one.

(10-29-2026 11:36 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I was just asking for you to name me one.single.honest politician. Just one.

There are few, if any, politicians who are 90 percent or more honest, BTF. Party politics do not lend themselves to having honest folks.

My understanding is that you asked for examples of politicians doing something for the greater good (and not examples of honest politicians). And I gave two examples: Murkowski and Fetterman.

Fetterman bucked his party to support Trump and the attack on Iran (which I also supported and hope will prove a major victory over the coming years). Fetterman did so for the "greater good" of our nation.

Murkowski is not supporting her fellow three Republicans in the Alaska gubernatorial race because she seemingly feels they are too partisan and, as such, won't be able to get much accomplished. She seemingly is doing this for what she feels is the "greater good" for her state.

On a similar note, the trio of eye-catching ladies who will join me this weekend will be undertaking naughty actions for "Bill's greater good." And I think you know what I mean by "greater good" in this case, my good man.

(10-29-2026 12:26 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(10-29-2026 11:36 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I was just asking for you to name me one.single.honest politician. Just one.

There are few, if any, politicians who are 90 percent of more honest, BTF. Party politics do not lend themselves to having honest folks.

My understanding is that you asked for examples of politicians doing something for the greater good (and not for honest pols). And I gave two examples: Murkowski and Fetterman.

Fetterman bucked his party to support Trump and the attack on Iran (which I also supported and hope will prove a major victory over the coming years). Fetterman did so for the "greater good" of our nation.

Murkowski is not supporting her fellow three Republicans in the Alaska gubernatorial race because she seemingly feels they are too partisan and, as such, won't be able to get much accomplished. She seemingly is doing this for what she feels is the "greater good" for her state.

On a similar note, the trio of eye-catching ladies who will join me this weekend will be undertaking naughty actions for "Bill's greater good." And I think you know what I mean by "greater good" in this case, my good man.

I have to ask you just one question ... how could one possibly fk up the resource rich that Alaska offers b/c too partisan from the right???

c'mon, mayun...

(10-29-2026 12:26 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(10-29-2026 11:36 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I was just asking for you to name me one.single.honest politician. Just one.

There are few, if any, politicians who are 90 percent of more honest, BTF. Party politics do not lend themselves to having honest folks.

My understanding is that you asked for examples of politicians doing something for the greater good (and not for honest pols). And I gave two examples: Murkowski and Fetterman.

Fetterman bucked his party to support Trump and the attack on Iran (which I also supported and hope will prove a major victory over the coming years). Fetterman did so for the "greater good" of our nation.

Murkowski is not supporting her fellow three Republicans in the Alaska gubernatorial race because she seemingly feels they are too partisan and, as such, won't be able to get much accomplished. She seemingly is doing this for what she feels is the "greater good" for her state.

Oh my gosh. I have some swamp land to sell you bill.

(10-29-2026 08:11 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(10-28-2026 09:18 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  I'm stating for the record that Lisa Murkowski's a RINO, Bartlett. lol

WE already know that, THEY will never admit it. So what's the point?

You'd be surprised at how many bots and guests that read this forum. lol (That's why, honestly.)

(10-29-2026 12:32 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-29-2026 12:26 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(10-29-2026 11:36 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I was just asking for you to name me one.single.honest politician. Just one.

There are few, if any, politicians who are 90 percent of more honest, BTF. Party politics do not lend themselves to having honest folks.

My understanding is that you asked for examples of politicians doing something for the greater good (and not for honest pols). And I gave two examples: Murkowski and Fetterman.

Fetterman bucked his party to support Trump and the attack on Iran (which I also supported and hope will prove a major victory over the coming years). Fetterman did so for the "greater good" of our nation.

Murkowski is not supporting her fellow three Republicans in the Alaska gubernatorial race because she seemingly feels they are too partisan and, as such, won't be able to get much accomplished. She seemingly is doing this for what she feels is the "greater good" for her state.

On a similar note, the trio of eye-catching ladies who will join me this weekend will be undertaking naughty actions for "Bill's greater good." And I think you know what I mean by "greater good" in this case, my good man.

I have to ask you just one question ... how could one possibly fk up the resource rich that Alaska offers b/c too partisan from the right???

c'mon, mayun...

I have no idea if Murkowski is correct to oppose the three Republican candidates, Stinky. What I admire about her is that she is not "married" to the Republican Party. Similarly, John Fetterman will go against his party on occasion.

As you know, I loathe the two main parties. I like independence. Murkowski shows some independence on occasion. Props given.

And worth noting: Murkowski was rather lovely back in the day.

https://x.com/lisamurkowski/status/1509704545202581509

(10-29-2026 12:38 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(10-29-2026 12:26 PM)bill dazzle Wrote:  

(10-29-2026 11:36 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I was just asking for you to name me one.single.honest politician. Just one.

There are few, if any, politicians who are 90 percent of more honest, BTF. Party politics do not lend themselves to having honest folks.

My understanding is that you asked for examples of politicians doing something for the greater good (and not for honest pols). And I gave two examples: Murkowski and Fetterman.

Fetterman bucked his party to support Trump and the attack on Iran (which I also supported and hope will prove a major victory over the coming years). Fetterman did so for the "greater good" of our nation.

Murkowski is not supporting her fellow three Republicans in the Alaska gubernatorial race because she seemingly feels they are too partisan and, as such, won't be able to get much accomplished. She seemingly is doing this for what she feels is the "greater good" for her state.

Oh my gosh. I have some swamp land to sell you bill.

Swampland Willie would be a stellar name for a blues guitarist. (Of course, if Swampland Willie were Asian, gay, a Buddhist and confined to a wheelchair ... the name would be even more joyous.)

It means you won't have the Murkowski machine helping the Republican. The machine always wins. #BrokenRecord

Quote:JUST IN: The DOJ issues 30 subpoenas in a criminal investigation into the Democrat scheme to interfere in the Alasaka Senate race.

Governor Mike Dunleavy has ALSO ordered a state investigation.

The subpoenas are targeting Democratic officials allegedly involved in recruiting a second candidate named Dan J. Sullivan to appear on the ballot against Republican Senator Dan S. Sullivan.

Prosecute everyone involved and remove Mary Peltola from the ballot.

Dems will stoop to any low.

The Plot Thickens: Have the Democrats 'Disappeared' Decoy Dan J. Sullivan?

Quote:Between all of that and the announcement that Alaska has reopened its own investigation into the matter, the next question is: where is apparent decoy, Dan J. Sullivan?

Allegedly, he is... nowhere to be found:

Have the Democrats hurriedly squired him off to the remotest parts of the Great Land? Enquiring minds want to know.

Relatedly, we also learned this week that apparently the Alaska political press corps didn't seem to find it strange that Dan J. Sullivan never held any campaign events:

Memo to Alaska journos: when The New York Times of all places delivers the goods on a major political scandal that y'all failed to, some journalistic soul-searching might be in order. Seriously.

(10-29-2026 06:45 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  The Plot Thickens: Have the Democrats 'Disappeared' Decoy Dan J. Sullivan?

Quote:Between all of that and the announcement that Alaska has reopened its own investigation into the matter, the next question is: where is apparent decoy, Dan J. Sullivan?

Allegedly, he is... nowhere to be found:

Have the Democrats hurriedly squired him off to the remotest parts of the Great Land? Enquiring minds want to know.

Relatedly, we also learned this week that apparently the Alaska political press corps didn't seem to find it strange that Dan J. Sullivan never held any campaign events:

Memo to Alaska journos: when The New York Times of all places delivers the goods on a major political scandal that y'all failed to, some journalistic soul-searching might be in order. Seriously.

why didn't 'they' ... b/c it's fk'n AK w/o a fohty-seven ... think about it for just a dayum nano...

what is How-are-ya in relative terms ... why do the donks wanna stack the courts ... why do they want to add states...

you only get two in the Senate...

pretty fk'n simple, man...