This incredibly stupid young girl apparently is unaware that every society and people on the earth from the beginning of time are based around the nuclear family.
I also notice in most of these interactions that these college kids always sound like they are about to have a panic attack or start crying when they talk to someone that might actually disagree with them. It goes way being just some nerves, within seconds they are nearly in tears and can't even breathe.
Notice after the very first question she almost broke down and her voice began to shake badly. When she first spoke she sounded confident. Then with the very first pushback/question asked she almost began to cry she was shaking so bad inside. What a dramatic change in her voice the second a question was asked. She instantly went from speaking clealry to barely being able to speak at all.
That is common in these college or street interactions. They are so confident and sure of themselves until you ask the first and most basic question. Then they can barely speak or even breathe properly. Its as if this is the first time they were asked a question their entire lives.
Its actually a good thing that these are dominated by women and the few men that join them are so weak and so overwhelmingly beta cucks. If these were people that actually had some testosterone running through their veins they would be very dangerous.
As is though they are still very dangerous because they vote and almost all media be it social or otherwise are behind them. And we have a lot of very stupid people out there who are easily brainwashed and misled by idiocy. Gitnoles are everywhere.
Its these exact people who have created the situation in France and Europe.
(This post was last modified: 10-22-2026 04:26 AM by ericsrevenge76.)
If it weren't for the promise of the Cross, I'd be very worried about our future.
I reckon I've seen worse, but I can't remember when. These kids, man, how did they get so out of whack? That's rhetorical. I have some thoughts on that, but I'll keep them to myself here.
(10-22-2026 05:21 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote: If it weren't for the promise of the Cross, I'd be very worried about our future.
I reckon I've seen worse, but I can't remember when. These kids, man, how did they get so out of whack? That's rhetorical. I have some thoughts on that, but I'll keep them to myself here.
I still think America is doomed before the 2nd coming, but we also seem to be the last line of defense against the invasion or 3rd world Muslims, radicals and wokists.
(10-22-2026 04:12 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote: The nuclear family was created by slave owners.
This incredibly stupid young girl apparently is unaware that every society and people on the earth from the beginning of time are based around the nuclear family.
I also notice in most of these interactions that these college kids always sound like they are about to have a panic attack or start crying when they talk to someone that might actually disagree with them. It goes way being just some nerves, within seconds they are nearly in tears and can't even breathe.
Notice after the very first question she almost broke down and her voice began to shake badly. When she first spoke she sounded confident. Then with the very first pushback/question asked she almost began to cry she was shaking so bad inside. What a dramatic change in her voice the second a question was asked. She instantly went from speaking clealry to barely being able to speak at all.
That is common in these college or street interactions. They are so confident and sure of themselves until you ask the first and most basic question. Then they can barely speak or even breathe properly. Its as if this is the first time they were asked a question their entire lives.
Its actually a good thing that these are dominated by women and the few men that join them are so weak and so overwhelmingly beta cucks. If these were people that actually had some testosterone running through their veins they would be very dangerous.
As is though they are still very dangerous because they vote and almost all media be it social or otherwise are behind them. And we have a lot of very stupid people out there who are easily brainwashed and misled by idiocy. Gitnoles are everywhere.
Its these exact people who have created the situation in France and Europe.
Just let the fools read Gibbons on the fall of the Roman Empire
Without a Nuclear Family you won’t have a civil society
It becomes every person for themselves
10-22-2026 04:02 PM
Advertisement
bill dazzle
Craft beer and urban living enthusiast
Posts: 18,540
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 2023
I Root For: Vanderbilt
Location: Nashville
(10-22-2026 03:59 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote: It seems bill is racist.
See how fair that is bill?
Bill Dazzle can be Archie Bunker-like at times: intolerant, crusty, racially insensitive. I'm definitely "culturally biased." I like Celtic music, beer, the movies of Woody Allen and art deco architecture. You can't get much "whiter" than that.
I sometimes see my bias in how at look at individuals and groups of people. I've been intolerant of both MAGA and libtards. Often, I'm an ass when I am. I just laugh it off, look in the mirror and say, "Yep. I can be a judgmental jerk. I will always need to keep working to improve. I'm imperfect."
On this theme, it never ceases to catch my attention there are folks on this board (and in general) who feel they are incapable, at least on occasion, of acting/talking/thinking in a racist or ethnically biased manner. That's a baffler. There seemingly conservative posters on this board who believe only libtards can be racist. And that blacks are "more" racist than whites (news flash: both blacks and whites are of equal level of racist).
Time for a beer.
(This post was last modified: 10-22-2026 05:42 PM by bill dazzle.)
(10-22-2026 06:42 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote: You keep saying this stuff and I have to ask you to please quote some posts where people are saying what you keep claiming they’re saying.
When a conservative poster suggests that only libtards can be racist ...
... I've seen that type post on various occasions.
Or when a left-wing poster suggests all MAGA Americans are ignoramuses.
Those are two examples of bias (IMO)
I've seen other examples of negative opinion and thought from some lefties and righties on this board, BTF. I rarely note it in a post (and now try to avoid directing criticism at any one poster as I don't want to deal with the fallout) ... but some of the hypocrisy and veiled dislike of "those people" (MAGA, libtards, blacks, women, Christians, patriotic people, etc.). Various libs and right-wingers on this board struggle to contain their dislike for the "enemy." The animosity in this country is real. And it's unfortunate.
There is a reason I've come to loathe both the Democratic and Republicans parties. And the venom on this board from some on the left and some on the right reinforces my dislike.
And this is a key reason I try to post more light-hearted posts than serious posts. I don't want to get engulfed by the negativity.
(This post was last modified: 10-22-2026 08:03 PM by bill dazzle.)
(10-22-2026 04:12 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote: This incredibly stupid young girl apparently is unaware that every society and people on the earth from the beginning of time are based around the nuclear family.
....
Guess again.
Children in pre-agricultural societies are typically raised by the village. In agricultural societies the notion of “family” tends to be broad. Industrialization is what crystallizes this into distinct notions of “nuclear” and “extended” family.
-----
The term “nuclear family” refers to a family group consisting of two adults and their children. It’s considered the basic unit of the modern family structure. In this article, we delve deep into the concept of the nuclear family from a cultural anthropology perspective, exploring its origin, advantages and disadvantages, and its impact on society.
Origin of Nuclear Family
The concept of the nuclear family was not the dominant family structure in most cultures until the Industrial Revolution in the late 18th century. This shift was mainly due to urbanization and the necessity for family units to be more mobile in order to seek employment opportunities.
Pre-Industrial Nuclear Family:
Before the Industrial Revolution, extended families, which included grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins living in the same household, were the norm. There were cases of nuclear families existing within these extended families, but they were not autonomous units as we understand them today.
Post-Industrial Nuclear Family:
With the advent of the Industrial Revolution, urban living and mobility became essential. The small and self-sufficient nuclear family unit thus became more practical and gradually turned into the dominant family structure.
The young woman you mention, however she thinks of this history, is aware that substantial cultural evolution has taken place. And she knows economic factors play a role.
She is also knows a historical development continues to have repercussions in American society:
Slave holders, whatever pride they took in their own (extended, agricultural) families, actively sought to destroy any corresponding sense of family among the enslaved.
Has anyone here not yet been granted the—sobering, saddening, strengthening—good fortune to read Frederick Douglass’s account of growing up in such a system? If so, you are warmly encouraged to make acquaintance. He’s a straight shooter. You will feel many things, but you won’t forget it.
For students and teachers first learning about Douglass, there is no better place to start than his first autobiography, The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass (1845).
(10-22-2026 08:48 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote: Quote it then. You keep saying people say these things but I never see them. Just you insinuating it. Quotes please or it didn’t happen.
Claiming that no person (liberal, centrist or conservative) has ever posted on this board with bias, racial/ethnic insensitivity, disrespect toward women, gays, evangelical Christians, Muslims, MAGA, etc. ...
... is as bold (and absurd) as describing Bill Dazzle as a dignified gentleman of conventional bearing and reserved manner.
(This post was last modified: 10-23-2026 09:12 AM by bill dazzle.)
(10-22-2026 04:12 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote: This incredibly stupid young girl apparently is unaware that every society and people on the earth from the beginning of time are based around the nuclear family.
....
Guess again.
Children in pre-agricultural societies are typically raised by the village. In agricultural societies the notion of “family” tends to be broad. Industrialization is what crystallizes this into distinct notions of “nuclear” and “extended” family.
The term “nuclear family” refers to a family group consisting of two adults and their children. It’s considered the basic unit of the modern family structure. In this article, we delve deep into the concept of the nuclear family from a cultural anthropology perspective, exploring its origin, advantages and disadvantages, and its impact on society.
Origin of Nuclear Family
The concept of the nuclear family was not the dominant family structure in most cultures until the Industrial Revolution in the late 18th century. This shift was mainly due to urbanization and the necessity for family units to be more mobile in order to seek employment opportunities.
Pre-Industrial Nuclear Family:
Before the Industrial Revolution, extended families, which included grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins living in the same household, were the norm. There were cases of nuclear families existing within these extended families, but they were not autonomous units as we understand them today.
Post-Industrial Nuclear Family:
With the advent of the Industrial Revolution, urban living and mobility became essential. The small and self-sufficient nuclear family unit thus became more practical and gradually turned into the dominant family structure.
The young woman you mention, however she thinks of this history, is aware that substantial cultural evolution has taken place and economic factors play a role.
She is also aware of a historical development that continues to have repercussions in American society:
Slave holders, whatever pride they took in their own (extended, agricultural) families, actively sought to destroy any corresponding sense of family among the enslaved.
Anyone who has not yet had the (sobering, saddening, strengthening) good fortune to read Frederick Douglass’s account of growing up inside such a system is warmly encouraged to make acquaintance. You will feel many things, but you won’t forget it.
For students and teachers first learning about Douglass, there is no better place to start than his first autobiography, The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass (1845).
The nuclear family can exist within a "tribe" or within an extended family. You can try to dance around it's importance but all all of history boiled down to groups of fathers, mothers and their children. In healthy societies, the strongest bonds should be maintained between the husband and wife. The next strongest bonds are between the parents and children. It should be no surprise that those tribes and societies that widely deviate from this structure have achieved very little in comparison to the west or worse, they're 3rd world shitholes. Look at the impact of divorce and especially the fatherless epidemic.
(This post was last modified: 10-23-2026 09:33 AM by b2b.)
(10-22-2026 04:12 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote: This incredibly stupid young girl apparently is unaware that every society and people on the earth from the beginning of time are based around the nuclear family.
....
Guess again.
Children in pre-agricultural societies are typically raised by the village. In agricultural societies the notion of “family” tends to be broad. Industrialization is what crystallizes this into distinct notions of “nuclear” and “extended” family.
The term “nuclear family” refers to a family group consisting of two adults and their children. It’s considered the basic unit of the modern family structure. In this article, we delve deep into the concept of the nuclear family from a cultural anthropology perspective, exploring its origin, advantages and disadvantages, and its impact on society.
Origin of Nuclear Family
The concept of the nuclear family was not the dominant family structure in most cultures until the Industrial Revolution in the late 18th century. This shift was mainly due to urbanization and the necessity for family units to be more mobile in order to seek employment opportunities.
Pre-Industrial Nuclear Family:
Before the Industrial Revolution, extended families, which included grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins living in the same household, were the norm. There were cases of nuclear families existing within these extended families, but they were not autonomous units as we understand them today.
Post-Industrial Nuclear Family:
With the advent of the Industrial Revolution, urban living and mobility became essential. The small and self-sufficient nuclear family unit thus became more practical and gradually turned into the dominant family structure.
The young woman you mention, however she thinks of this history, is aware that substantial cultural evolution has taken place and economic factors play a role.
She is also aware of a historical development that continues to have repercussions in American society:
Slave holders, whatever pride they took in their own (extended, agricultural) families, actively sought to destroy any corresponding sense of family among the enslaved.
Anyone who has not yet had the (sobering, saddening, strengthening) good fortune to read Frederick Douglass’s account of growing up inside such a system is warmly encouraged to make acquaintance. You will feel many things, but you won’t forget it.
For students and teachers first learning about Douglass, there is no better place to start than his first autobiography, The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass (1845).
